HOME | DD | Gallery | Favourites | RSS

| StyleOverSubstance

StyleOverSubstance [32756441] [2014-09-21 20:23:53 +0000 UTC] (United States)

# Statistics

Favourites: 38; Deviations: 71; Watchers: 82

Watching: 0; Pageviews: 9195; Comments Made: 159; Friends: 0

# Interests

Favorite writers: My dA peeps.

# About me

This account was created by SilverInkblot , with the help of copper9lives , for a literature experiment - I aim to test whether deviants can distinguish the writing styles of each other without a name attached to the piece. No deviation submitted here is mine.


# Comments

Comments: 37

Fehnryr [2015-05-06 03:01:14 +0000 UTC]

Just wondering, when does round 9 start?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

StyleOverSubstance In reply to Fehnryr [2015-05-09 21:08:56 +0000 UTC]

When I get enough pieces; right now, I'm one more submission short.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Fehnryr [2015-05-06 02:34:58 +0000 UTC]

Holy cow this sounds fun! Can't wait to try it out

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

StyleOverSubstance In reply to Fehnryr [2015-05-09 21:08:33 +0000 UTC]

Awesome!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

DamonWakes [2015-04-07 14:51:47 +0000 UTC]

Hey, just wanted to stop by and say that this game is a really neat idea. I've been way too busy to throw my hat into the ring, but I've enjoyed seeing how it's been playing out so far. I'll try and remember to point people towards it when I can.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

StyleOverSubstance In reply to DamonWakes [2015-04-08 03:27:56 +0000 UTC]

Thank you Hope you'll get a chance to submit something yourself soon!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Caffeinated-Bunny [2015-03-28 04:26:40 +0000 UTC]

Thank you for the badge.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

StyleOverSubstance In reply to Caffeinated-Bunny [2015-03-30 00:22:59 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

dressagelover101 [2015-02-08 16:44:19 +0000 UTC]

So excited for the end of the round!   I can't wait to see who actually wrote my favorite pieces from round six!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

StyleOverSubstance In reply to dressagelover101 [2015-02-09 07:53:07 +0000 UTC]

I'll write up the results tomorrow - I've had a long weekend And thank you for the point donation!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

dressagelover101 In reply to StyleOverSubstance [2015-02-09 17:12:46 +0000 UTC]

I know the feeling! And you're very welcome, it's my pleasure.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Nichrysalis [2015-02-02 09:23:19 +0000 UTC]

Not only am I going to win this round, I am going to guess everyone correctly in one guess AND BE CRAZY WHILE I DO IT! Ahah, ahahaa, ahahahahahahaaaaaaaah!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

StyleOverSubstance In reply to Nichrysalis [2015-02-03 04:04:47 +0000 UTC]

We will be watching your antics with interest.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Nichrysalis In reply to StyleOverSubstance [2015-02-03 04:57:21 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Ja-mes [2014-11-15 12:08:30 +0000 UTC]

Hi there. Can you fill me in on what this is all about? Looks fun!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

StyleOverSubstance In reply to Ja-mes [2014-11-15 18:30:44 +0000 UTC]

The long version is over here: Rules Revamp! The short version is that authors send me pieces, and I upload them to this account, where players hunt through the provided list trying to match the piece with the writer. As the account name suggests, the game is all about discovering how distinct an authors style is, and if they can be identified without their name attached to the piece

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

wei-en [2014-11-14 09:09:30 +0000 UTC]

This looks really fun! I was a bit confused at first, but I really like this idea I am interested for more.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

StyleOverSubstance In reply to wei-en [2014-11-14 23:57:56 +0000 UTC]

Just jump in and start guessing if you like I provide a list on each piece to make things a little easier, but this is proving to be a pretty tough round for everyone - I haven't seen many correct answers.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

wei-en In reply to StyleOverSubstance [2014-11-15 08:22:08 +0000 UTC]

Also, I think it might be worth your while to say that the pieces are 'submitted by their author' rather than 'submitted by another deviant'. It gives the impression that these are snippets that might have been borrowed from others' galleries without their knowledge, and it's a bit confusing when you get tagged even if it's obviously not yours!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

StyleOverSubstance In reply to wei-en [2014-11-15 18:28:13 +0000 UTC]

Good point. I'll be sure to rework the wording in the next round!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

wei-en In reply to StyleOverSubstance [2014-11-15 07:56:55 +0000 UTC]

*guessing and analysis intensifies*

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

thesquareroot [2014-10-16 07:39:53 +0000 UTC]

i say really up the experiment a notch and leave out the poems title until correctly identified. that way you can eliminate the variable of reverse searches

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

StyleOverSubstance In reply to thesquareroot [2014-10-16 16:28:53 +0000 UTC]

I don't see how that would change anything - the pieces submitted to the game are all new and aren't posted to dA until after the guessing game, so there's no way to reverse search for them.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

thesquareroot In reply to StyleOverSubstance [2014-10-17 03:36:55 +0000 UTC]

ah, sorry , that information wasn't readily presented (though i did find a little blurb mentioning it after 5 or so minutes of looking around for it) 

so i am to assume submission is not a pre-requisite of being listed? (since i've never submitted anything and was named a possible author on a piece)

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

StyleOverSubstance In reply to thesquareroot [2014-10-17 17:39:18 +0000 UTC]

Not at all - in fact, it's the opposite. I can't accept a piece that's been submitted to dA cause that would defeat the whole purpose of the game Players have to send me a note with the piece, or a link to Stash, so that everything is anonymous. At the end of the round, authors will be free to post the piece to their own account.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

haijinik [2014-10-15 09:18:23 +0000 UTC]

i was not asked permission and i would actually prefer to be left out of this. please take my name off the list. if my work appears in your gallery i will report it. thank you.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

StyleOverSubstance In reply to haijinik [2014-10-15 15:58:34 +0000 UTC]

Which deviation has your name in the list?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Edges-to-Everything [2014-09-30 15:04:50 +0000 UTC]

Re-Watch. I somehow became disconnected.
(Ghost in the machine...)

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

StyleOverSubstance In reply to Edges-to-Everything [2014-09-30 23:51:18 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Pianocanival [2014-09-30 05:55:24 +0000 UTC]

I'm not jumping right in but I'm really interested. I'll be in tune.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

StyleOverSubstance In reply to Pianocanival [2014-09-30 23:51:08 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Pianocanival In reply to StyleOverSubstance [2014-10-01 04:00:47 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

haphazardmelody [2014-09-29 04:35:22 +0000 UTC]

I missed when it started, but I think it's awesome!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

StyleOverSubstance In reply to haphazardmelody [2014-09-29 07:17:15 +0000 UTC]

Thanks! You've only missed a few rounds - there's plenty of time to jump in.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

gliitchlord [2014-09-22 05:17:02 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

StyleOverSubstance In reply to gliitchlord [2014-09-22 06:03:20 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SilverInkblot [2014-09-21 20:34:30 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0