HOME | DD
Published: 2005-01-11 23:27:29 +0000 UTC; Views: 2878; Favourites: 58; Downloads: 364
Redirect to original
Description
There's a method to my madness. Several things influenced the outfit and character itself, one of them being the armour of the Hakkeshu pilots in Zeorymer, and simply staring at a picture of a black dress. >> Character-wise, the concept was a combination of Street Fighter 2:V in which Chun Li had a mind control device placed on her forehead by Bison/Vega, and the first issue of the Hong Kong Street Fighter III comic (before the comic series just became, for lack of a better word, 'stupid'). Put it all together, and the result was THIS. This isn't the first time I drew Chun Li in this kind of outfit, although compared to the original, this one is an improvement over my original in terms of details and anatomy. Whether I feel like uploading that pic is a different story.Related content
Comments: 22
Ririran [2005-01-13 05:42:06 +0000 UTC]
The outfit is pretty cool. I love the arm guard on the right hand! Its also a pretty good pose.
(Love for Chun Li!!!!!!!!!)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AegisKHAOS In reply to Ririran [2005-01-13 06:07:54 +0000 UTC]
Love for Chun Li indeed. Especially a vicious one. ^^
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
RachelYork [2005-01-12 06:20:10 +0000 UTC]
I love Chun Li, I really like this pose!! Good job!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
bluekatt [2005-01-12 03:54:29 +0000 UTC]
any pic of chunners the second leading lady of video gaming ( samus aran is the first )
is a good one
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ChocolateDivineDiva [2005-01-11 23:52:22 +0000 UTC]
Mm.... nice stuff. I like how the ribbons end, but not so crazy with how the meatballs turned out. And is that line there on her left side part of the outfit, or is she wearing an underwire? I love the details on the bodice, as well as the armour and the mind-control gizmo. Oh and props for keeping her as buff as she usually is.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AegisKHAOS In reply to ChocolateDivineDiva [2005-01-12 00:31:24 +0000 UTC]
Yes, a slim Chun Li is usually rather strange.
As for the line on her side, that is actually supposed to be the seam line of her outfit.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ChocolateDivineDiva In reply to AegisKHAOS [2005-01-12 00:40:24 +0000 UTC]
Uhh...... I didn't mean the side of her as in down the length of the side where the seam is. That I understood. The side part that I was referring to happens to be the side of her cleavage. > _>; That is an underwire, right?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AegisKHAOS In reply to ChocolateDivineDiva [2005-01-12 00:42:12 +0000 UTC]
Actually, haven't decided. >>;
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ChocolateDivineDiva In reply to AegisKHAOS [2005-01-12 01:21:46 +0000 UTC]
Because of the placement of the flowers and lines on the bodice, it kinda seems like a part of it... until you reach a different part of the outfit that covers her shoulder. The line continues through til just over the transition in the fabric, so it says otherwise. If it seems like an underwire, then why is it there?? Which means there's a third possibility-- that line should only exist if her breast was smushed flat against her (which it isn't). Hmm...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AegisKHAOS In reply to ChocolateDivineDiva [2005-01-12 23:15:09 +0000 UTC]
Did I mention I haven't decided? Afterall, it blends in rather nicely anyways.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ChocolateDivineDiva In reply to AegisKHAOS [2005-01-13 01:03:29 +0000 UTC]
Aaaarrrrrggghhhh!!!! For the fourth time of having to recreate the comment, here goes:
Yes yes, you did mention you hadn't decided. And yes, it does blend in pretty nicely. But it's just there, staring at me in the face kinda blending in, but not quite completely camouflaged completely.
And as with all kids and their fascination with the letter Y for all things, I ask this: "Why?" As in why is there a line there that sorta defines where her breast is?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AegisKHAOS In reply to ChocolateDivineDiva [2005-01-13 03:16:48 +0000 UTC]
And to answer the question 'why', it is because I haven't decided.
Accept it, because there will be no other answer.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ChocolateDivineDiva In reply to AegisKHAOS [2005-01-13 05:27:32 +0000 UTC]
>_>;; As much as I accept your answer, I accept the fact that my question is still valid. Who said anything about giving an answer to it? Don't assume....
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AegisKHAOS In reply to ChocolateDivineDiva [2005-01-13 06:04:10 +0000 UTC]
Wouldn't be polite not to give an answer anyways.
Therefore, once more, it is undecided.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ChocolateDivineDiva In reply to AegisKHAOS [2005-01-14 01:12:13 +0000 UTC]
Polite..??
Off-topic here, but I just realised that I have sigs attached to my comments that aren't my sigs!! It actually looks a lot like something * torontojack would put. >_>; Anyone else seeing that?
Anyhoo, the Chun Li pic looks pretty spiffy regardless of anything discussed. ^__^
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AegisKHAOS In reply to ChocolateDivineDiva [2005-01-14 01:32:48 +0000 UTC]
You mean this?
Effectiveness: n Doing the right thing. Effeciency: n Doing things right.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ChocolateDivineDiva In reply to AegisKHAOS [2005-01-14 02:35:13 +0000 UTC]
That's what's supposed to be there, and I checked before making that last comment... However, I still see:
(for three comments before the last one, and is the one I'm saying could belong to *torontojack instead)
Hopes are for the lazy. Wishes are for the ignorant. Dreams are for the passive. But love... love is for those who would risk heaven and hell, broken hearts and tears, just to be wrapped up in another's arms once more.
(for one comment before that)
ME! lol
Tell me I haven't lost it, and I'm not imagining this.... Wait! Tell me it's a glitch, since the other option is that someone's hacked my password and has changed it on me....
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AegisKHAOS In reply to ChocolateDivineDiva [2005-01-14 03:48:18 +0000 UTC]
Note that I never noticed it. >>
👍: 0 ⏩: 0

























