HOME | DD
binarystep — Lake Erie UFO
Published: 2012-05-25 01:05:07 +0000 UTC; Views: 227; Favourites: 0; Downloads: 4
Redirect to original
Description
Power-hungry UFO?A UFO spotted by Lake Erie, NY in 2003. It appears to be firing a blue beam into the nuclear plant.
Related content
Comments: 21
There could be many explanations for what you saw.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Like what?
(Also, I didn't take this.)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Smudge on the camera; lighting from the sun etc.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
A colorful moving smudge?
Also, lighting doesn't just float. It has to reflect off of a surface. Also, the Sun doesn't cause that type of lightshow.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
The lighting would reflect off the lens of the camera, of course.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Okay, so how would sunlight reflect off the FRONT of the camera if the sun is BEHIND the cameraman?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
How do you know the camera man is in front of the sun? The sun could just be above the view of the camera.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Well then, how would a smudge move from the right, stop in the center, move up, drop a different colored thing, have the different colored thing move down into the nuclear plant, and then have the original object lower and move to the left until it goes off camera?
Also, any explanations for other UFOs?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
As for the first statement, I'm not sure what you mean by 'move from the right, stop in the centre, move up (etc.)' because what I see is an image, one that isn't moving. But, is I did see this video or whatever, I would STILL try to examine the situation, and look at other alternatives for this event. I would not immediately assume it's an alien.
As a constructive criticism, I would recommend doing as follows if you want people to believe you; when you receive a strange piece of phenomena, instead of jumping to aliens, try to disprove every single other explanation. Try not to be biased. When you do this, this means that the best possible explanation is your answer - aliens. This means that every alternative is false - please examine each and every one. This is the only way to convince people of something as bizarre as aliens.
Basically, please don't jump to aliens. I can tell your passionately interested in them, but the best way to convince other people that they exist is try to cancel out every alternative leaving aliens as the only explanation.
As for your second question; I'm afraid it's very vague. What do you mean by 'other UFOs'? I'm afraid I've never seen any and I haven't been shown very good evidence. There are strange events that could have been the because of aliens, but a good curious person doesn't jump to conclusions - I have to be shown excellent evidence to believe anything. This way, I am certain about things and can effectively argue about phenomena. I think you should assume this behaviour, especially when it comes to conspiracies and aliens.
You have to 100% certain of things in order to convince and effectively argue. Your arguments are all questions for example; not based on any scientific fact. It is not my burden to prove anything to you; I shouldn't have to answer any questions. YOU made a claim that you saw aliens. YOU have to prove that to me.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
What I mean by "other UFOs" is the other photos I have uploaded.
Also, this isn't MY photo! I got it from ufocasebook.com!
Here's my argument: A multicolored object dropped a blue beam into a power plant. A camera smudge can't move.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
No, a camera smudge can't move, however a camera smudge can extend from top to bottom (for example if an oily finger ran across the lens from top to bottom). This COULD POTENTIALLY (I'm not certain, here) be a trick of the light better still. The sun could reflect off this line of oil and make it appear to be a beam shooting at a power plant. This could be an alternative, can it not? This is what I mean when I say alternative. There are hundreds like it; none involving aliens.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
It. Moved. Side. To. Side.
Also, the photographer said it wasn't a smudge. I'm fairly sure he'd know.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Well, how well do you know the photographer?
You see, this come back to my human behaviours argument. I want to make one thing particularly clear. Humans are extremely vulnerable to mistakes! Misinterpretations; mishearing; misprinting; but especially the mistake convincing themselves of things!
Suppose the photographer (again, I'm not certain, here - I do not know the photographer. When I say this I am not personally offending anyone when I say this because EVERYONE is capable of making this mistake) did leave a smudge on the camera. He did leave a smudge on the camera, but he ignored it because he wanted to believe that an alien attacked a power plant.
I don't know if this is the case or not, but my question is - do YOU know? This is evidence you have given me, and I am merely questioning it, which you (as the researcher) should do, too. Again, I'm not trying personally offend you or the photographer. SO many people do this - it's practically why conspiracies exist! They exaggerate experiences or make false evidence simply because they WANT to believe in something. I know this. I know people who do this.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
This photo was analyzed and found to be legit by ufocasebook.com. They're experts with computers. Not conspiracy theorists. They only have real photos.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I don't want their evidence. I want yours. I'm still iffy on this ufocasebook.com fellas.
And out of curiosity, what in the world did the blue beams do to the power plant? Blow it up??? Like whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ---
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I didn't take the photo.
Also, ufocasebook.com is trustworthy. Why don't you trust them?
Also, I heard the power plant stopped working, and had to be repaired afterwards.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Hrmmmmm... bizarre how the power plant stopped working, if you're certain that it did. That's actually very interesting; however again, there could be another explanation for this and the image taken could have been a coincidence! I'm just throwing that out there! I know, it would be a very strange one and it would be hard to believe, but I'm not saying that your wrong, I'm just saying it's POSSIBLE it's a coincidence.
I'm just iffy on the ufocasebook guys because sometimes people that are very dedicated to aliens could potentially be just a TAD biased - don't you think? Like imagine working so hard your whole like on something; if you ever found a flaw in your research you would ignore it because you wouldn't want your whole life's work to be for nothing. It's POSSIBLE that they could be biased. I don't personally know these guys I'm just spectating from experience and knowledge of how people work. It's simply possible. I just don't ant to put ally my eggs (trust) in one basket.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Also, UFOCasebook provides real evidence. Photos, videos, government documents released because of the FIA (Freedom of Information Act)
They also aren't biased. If they find a fake, they call it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Well, for one thing, I know the meow comes from the cat because at the same time a cat's vocal chord vibrates and the sound comes from the direction of the cat ------ you know haha very funny 
Okok ufocasebook.com has nice evidence, and they call out fakes that's nice.
Buuuuuuuuuuuuut want your evidence 
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
What I'm saying is, it's possible for it to be a UFO. No one knows what it is now, so we'll have to wait and see.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Well, to assume its a UFO is a great assumption. A jump. Maybe in the mean time assume it's something more realistic but keep it on file unless you learn something about it
It's nice to talk to you. I have to go, but have a nice...day/night (depends on where you live)
👍: 0 ⏩: 0