HOME | DD

bugx In reply to GeMir [2009-01-01 21:11:47 +0000 UTC]

freut mich :]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

bugx In reply to maView [2008-01-13 19:13:51 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

bugx In reply to Anarkhki [2007-06-17 12:12:01 +0000 UTC]

thanks a lot

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

bugx In reply to Pim-s [2007-06-16 12:38:36 +0000 UTC]

thank you I will

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

bugx In reply to rickygck [2007-06-09 14:25:51 +0000 UTC]

greatly appreciated, plus a big thanks for the fav <3

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

bugx In reply to toub [2007-05-26 22:10:39 +0000 UTC]

mich fasziniert es auch, wie gehaltvoll "nichts" doch sein kann
freut mich dass es dir gefällt

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

bugx In reply to ervilhaa [2007-05-23 13:21:35 +0000 UTC]

aw, thank you
but what does "estaticism" mean?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ervilhaa In reply to bugx [2007-05-23 14:48:29 +0000 UTC]

hmmm...how can i explain this to you...it's a concept that finds true beauty and meaning in things, people, or situations that are in a "static" position, or appear to be "stopped" in time...they don't have any movement associated with them...because of this, they are usually discarted by people..no one takes notice in them...for example..a ship passing by so slowly..a wire hanging from a wall...a person that is leaned to a wall just daydreaming...

i don't know how to explain it better...don't know if you got the idea...what do you think?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

bugx In reply to ervilhaa [2007-05-23 17:38:28 +0000 UTC]

Ah yes, I guess I understand.
That's a pretty interesting analysis "poetic estatitcism", things so ordinary no one takes notice of them. But when you remove them out of their context they suddenly become interesting somehow.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ervilhaa In reply to bugx [2007-05-23 18:58:08 +0000 UTC]

yes that's the thought

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

bugx In reply to smersci [2007-05-21 20:07:24 +0000 UTC]

glad you like it,
thanks for the fav :]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

smersci In reply to bugx [2007-05-21 20:14:05 +0000 UTC]

you are wellcome

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

bugx In reply to myobsessionwithfire [2007-05-21 10:48:41 +0000 UTC]

oh thank you (:

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

bugx In reply to Th0rNe [2007-05-20 12:01:42 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

bugx In reply to argylekidd [2007-05-20 10:17:55 +0000 UTC]

thanks
well yeah, sounds pretty interesting. But actually I have no idea how a photography-collab could work

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

argylekidd In reply to bugx [2007-05-20 16:11:26 +0000 UTC]

hmm, i was thinking we could both pick a few shots and see what work together as a diptych

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

bugx In reply to rockbar [2007-05-19 20:39:51 +0000 UTC]

freut mich sehr,
inwiefern regt es dich denn zum nachdenken an?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

rockbar In reply to bugx [2007-05-19 20:57:20 +0000 UTC]

Ich bin mir nicht ganz sicher.
Weniger ist manchmal mehr. Und so sehe ich das auch mit dem nachdenken! Ich kann dir jetzt aber nicht genau sagen was oder wie ich (darüber) nachdenke!
Kommt bei mir auf jedenfall super an

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

bugx In reply to rockbar [2007-05-19 21:02:49 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0