HOME | DD
Bullter —
8.Tiger python_attack
[NSFW]
Published: 2008-07-14 16:40:57 +0000 UTC; Views: 29830; Favourites: 1029; Downloads: 230
Redirect to original
Description
Python molurus bivittatus and rattRelated content
Comments: 1833
So?
You just said if it happens in nature it's justified, now you're saying it's not because we're smart. What? What does that even matter? How smart do you have to be in order to feel pain and suffering?
We're a smart species, so why shouldn't we be smart enough to realize more humane options to certain things we do exist and use them instead?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
It's also against nature to wear clothes. In that stead, I demand you remove all of your unnatural out wear.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
lol what
never did I say unnatural = bad
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Well. Are you naked yet? If not then you are defying nature. I demand you strip
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I don't have any problem with defying nature =3
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
....Lets defy it together....
FFFFFFFFFF.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Oh? Then what's the big deal with feeding a mouse to a snake? That defies nature amirite?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
sigh
did you even read the comments?
I never said it's wrong because it's not natural, I said it's not JUSTIFIED just because it's natural.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
That makes no sense. I bet a lot of what you do in your daily routine could be chalked down to something unjustified.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
oh wow
are you fucking serious
Let me try to explain this to you in simpler terms so you grasp it
Since a lot of people are saying "it's okay because it's natural!" I was refuting the idea that it being "natural" automatically makes it okay, and pointing out that it's actually not really natural at all. I NEVER said that that it's wrong because it isn't natural.
Do you fucking understand yet?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
No, why don't you explain it in longer, more accurately written paragraphs. Or can't you tell that you're just talking to yourself?
You're also reading into a picture that isn't meant to be read so far that you're raping it. Seriously. I don't see a cage in this picture, and I see no human interaction. Who is to say this picture couldn't have been taken in a natural environment unprovoked?
Or are you really nit picking something so mundane? I'm a vegetarian and I don't nitpick apart stupid shit like this.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I just did explain it, I really don't see how it needs a bigger explanation, if you can't understand the very simple explanation I just gave you, then you just fail at reading comprehension which isn't really my problem, sorry.
I also didn't say anything about the picture at all, so thanks for proving how literate you are once again
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
If you didn't say anything about the picture, why are you even here replying to everyone's comments?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Why are you replying to mine?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Because you replied to my comment in the first place.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
But you didn't reply to that comment, you're replying to my comment to someone else, so you're pretty much doing the same thing
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Just like you were replying to other people's comments on this picture
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Dude. Just answer the fucking question.
You never commented on the picture.
The rat in the picture was prekilled.
My comment wasn't aimed at you.
So what the fuck is your problem.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
P.S. how do you know it was pre-killed? It doesn't look like it was to me~
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Well I'm pretty sure only the photographer can really know
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I like how everyone eventually just stops responding to my actual points and instead just start bitching about the fact that I commented.
Am I forcing you to reply? No.
If you don't have an actual response to what my point was, then why the hell are you replying?
And no, I'm not gonna answer your question, since you didn't reply to my points anyway =3
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
... Ugh. You're completely hopeless.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Why because you can't keep yourself from replying even though you're complaining about my comments? That's not really my problem
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Wow. You're about as bright as a black crayon. Because you haven't caught on to the fact that I don't care what you say. I'm just Doing It For The Lulz. Which is generally what encourages me to troll people like you who are too dense to realize you've spoken and spoken poorly, so people who don't really care about your opinion or find your opinion to be poorly stated. Also, your typing could use some work. Consistency is a good thing.
👍: 0 ⏩: 3
She does a lot of double-talk, Mr. Lulz, and reads so far into things, trying to find something, ANYTHING, to argue about.. that she ends coming up with shit that isn't even there.. and will then try to play it off like she didn't say anything (or try to go into a completely unrelated argument) when she has her ass handed to her.
Signs of a clearly defeated idiot, still trying to fight.
She's lost the lulz factor, Mr. Lulz. So sad.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Speaking of bad typing, jesus christ look at yours.
"too dense to realize you've spoken and spoken poorly"
Wow I'm too dense to realize that I've not only spoken, but spoken poorly? Um, actually, I was already pretty aware of the fact that I've spoken. Thanks captain obvious.
"so people who don't really care about your opinion or find your opinion to be poorly stated."
So people who don't really care about my opinion or find my opinion to be poorly stated....what? Either you forgot to continue your sentence or you placed an unnecessary "who" there.
Work on your own fucking typing before you try to "troll" me for mine. You gotta be the biggest failtroll ever. Good job.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Oh I get the point you were trying to make dear. Actually, my tone of sarcasm from the get go just passed you right over. Didn't it?
Also, I never said I was a technical typing genius
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
You tried to make a point to refute something I never said. You created a strawman, (which is a pretty fail attempt at trolling btw) and when I explained to you what my actual position was so that you'd stop confusing it for the position you've imagined that I have, you intentionally ignored it then just called me stupid and say you were trolling me. Wow good job, you're a hilarious troll, let me guess you're gonna pretend to be chris chan's new girlfriend now right?
You can't even point out where I was inconsistent. Do you even know what that word means? Go back to 4chan kiddo
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
You're still replying, are you not? And with a deep tone of distaste. This only means I'm doing it right. All it really takes with you is a few well placed words, and calling you out on inconsistency.
"But that's not nature.
It's throwing a domestic rat to a domestic snake in a box with no chance to escape."
Then,
"Why not kill it to be humane."
This gives the deeply seated impression that you think this is inhuman. Just a guess. Inhumane indicates some form of cruelty, which also indicates bad. As this picture is about A snake eating a mouse, and you jump to assuming it's in a cage therefore not natural, you are implying that unnatural is bad.
Srsly, though I don't care one way or another. But you need to improve your point making skills, if you're gonna cry about it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Wow you're a fucking idiot.
That wasn't inconsistent at all. I JUST FUCKING EXPLAINED TO YOU what my point was and you COMPLETELY IGNORED IT
holy shit you're fucking retarded
I never said it's wrong because it's unnatural. I said that BEING NATURAL DOES NOT AUTOMATICALLY MAKE IT OKAY
THERE IS A FUCKING DIFFERENCE
IF YOU CAN'T UNDERSTAND THIS THEN YOU ARE RETARDED
I ALSO SAID NOTHING ABOUT THE PICTURE ITSELF
I already fucking explained this to you, you chose to fucking ignore it so you could pretend you still have a point. You are a retard.
Again you just created a strawman and you're aruging against something I NEVER FUCKING SAID
go get a lobotomy
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
No baby. I think you have trouble reading. Oh yes you made the point that being natural isn't always good. However you comment to me reflected that you don't mind being unnatural. So what? Everything has double standards with you? Grow up. I got your point a long time ago. I even told you a got it. You just can't read passed you own hubris.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
How is it a double standard? It's not my fault you pretend to get my point and then repeat myself making it clear you actually didn't get it at all.
If you got my point then good for you stop misrepresenting it then.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
You failed to catch the sarcasm littered through out every comment. For instance, by telling you: to write a more detailed paragraph, I was kidding
Oh and to your next response: tl;dr.
You'll probably only spew shit from here on out anyway.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
..and coming from the person who doesn't know the fucking commas and faps to furry on furry porno. Which is YOU
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
lol, good luck proving that. Typical "lol ur a furry" argument. Got anything original?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Got anything better to do than sit there and whiteknight 
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Got anything better to do than throw ad-hominem attacks instead of presenting an actual point?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I haven't been inconsistent, you just failed to understand a very simple explanation by your own admittance and now you're just trying to cop out by saying "lol i was trollan!!11"
And yeah you totally don't care that's why you commented and keep replying.
yeah okay. go back to ED where meme-spouting makes you witty and hilarious.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Can someone say butt hurt? I find you to be a hilarious case of fail. Because you dont even realize by replying, you are giving me enjoyment.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yeah sure
MEMES MEMES MEMES 4CHAN LULZ I AM FUNNY BECAUSE I SPOUT MEMES
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I love how your kind automatically calls 4chan on it. I can't recall the last time I clicked on 4chan
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
which means you probably come from ED or something which makes you even more retarded.
Yeah spouting memes was wicked cool and super hilarious, then I grew up
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Actually, no. I don't come from ED either. But good job on the assuming bit 
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
It's pretty easy to assume that since you think meme-spouting makes you hilarious like every other knuckle dragging moron from there.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>