HOME | DD

catdevnull — ..strikes again

Published: 2007-09-25 22:33:32 +0000 UTC; Views: 3612; Favourites: 12; Downloads: 59
Redirect to original
Description followup to another post from long ago.
catdevnull springs yet another leak
Related content
Comments: 93

EnzuDes1gn In reply to ??? [2007-09-30 00:46:56 +0000 UTC]

it's insane player your right there

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ftpaddict In reply to EnzuDes1gn [2007-09-30 13:12:31 +0000 UTC]

Then we should start an advertising campaign.
And for what it offers, it sure is cheap.
Cheaper than the Nano?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

EnzuDes1gn In reply to ftpaddict [2007-09-30 15:58:29 +0000 UTC]

alot cheaper than nano

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ftpaddict In reply to EnzuDes1gn [2007-09-30 16:28:31 +0000 UTC]

Then why the fuck do those idiots buy nanos?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

EnzuDes1gn In reply to ftpaddict [2007-09-30 16:51:14 +0000 UTC]

because they can't think for themsleves i guess and try out new things

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ftpaddict In reply to EnzuDes1gn [2007-09-30 17:05:34 +0000 UTC]

True that...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

catdevnull In reply to ??? [2007-09-28 15:27:42 +0000 UTC]

mobile usually means crippled and low quality.
x264 is a high quality full size format. and ipod market share makes it a reasonabl choice as well as other video sites like google video calling it the same

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

ftpaddict In reply to catdevnull [2007-09-28 16:32:39 +0000 UTC]

Well, and I hope you'll overlook my hatred for iPods, isn't this more or less an advertisement for apple's product?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

catdevnull In reply to ftpaddict [2007-09-28 16:56:10 +0000 UTC]

yes, of course just like xerox, aspirin thermos or escalator

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ftpaddict In reply to catdevnull [2007-09-28 18:11:30 +0000 UTC]

So what you're saying is that now every portable media player is to be considered an iPod.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

catdevnull In reply to ftpaddict [2007-09-28 18:37:28 +0000 UTC]

thats what the masses seem to think:

[link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ftpaddict In reply to catdevnull [2007-09-28 19:37:56 +0000 UTC]

Those are purposely made rip-offs, built in no-man's land, China. I don't see Creative or SanDisk ever copying apple's style of mp3 player.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Dshark In reply to ftpaddict [2007-09-29 04:50:19 +0000 UTC]

On the contrary, if you can call it "ripping off" SanDisk was mentioned in the article. But I agree I hold nothing but contempt for Apple. All they are is a monopolizing giant that over charges for their products just because they're "cool."

How I love my Zune, just because its a black sheep.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ftpaddict In reply to Dshark [2007-09-29 08:53:46 +0000 UTC]

I'd love a Zune too, if I could afford one.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Dshark In reply to ftpaddict [2007-09-29 13:03:42 +0000 UTC]

Zune is awesome. Also new ones are gonna be rolling out soon.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ftpaddict In reply to Dshark [2007-09-29 13:14:33 +0000 UTC]

Hopefully somewhat smaller. Zune's screen pwns iPods everywhere.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Dshark In reply to ftpaddict [2007-09-29 13:17:31 +0000 UTC]

Yeah theres gonna be a flash version and and an 80GB from what I've heard.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ftpaddict In reply to Dshark [2007-09-29 13:20:18 +0000 UTC]

80GB!
That's like twice as big as my HDD back home

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Dshark In reply to ftpaddict [2007-09-29 22:30:21 +0000 UTC]

Haha I know. I cant wait.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ShimmerStar In reply to ftpaddict [2007-09-28 19:50:15 +0000 UTC]

I think that *catdevnull was trying to say is that whenever a product gets super-popular, the general public tends to associate the most popular brandname as the standard for the product:

tissue: Kleenex
make a copy: Xerox it
give me some aspirin: give me a Tylenol (I've heard that one a lot, which is funny, since Tylenol doesn't have aspirin in it)
I need a soft drink: Coke please (I've heard people use Coke to describe any sort of soda....including pepsi products D: )
Hey this soup will stay warm in this insulated container: I'll put my soup in a Thermos

among other examples

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

ftpaddict In reply to ShimmerStar [2007-09-29 08:57:45 +0000 UTC]

I am aware of what he was trying to say, but this does not apply here. How would, for example, an owner of a multimedia-enabled device be able to tell that the iPod format works on his phone/pda/whatever as well?
We never say Kleenex instead of a tissue. We never use Tylenol, we never say Coke. Only Americans do that (and maybe Canadians too). For an international community, I think it's a weee biased.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Dshark In reply to ShimmerStar [2007-09-29 04:47:09 +0000 UTC]

Very true.

Or we can go take a dip in my Whirlpool.

But I also believe that a big part of what makes deviantART deviantART is that we typically don't go with the flow. Its what makes us cool. I think "Portable video player format" may be a better term. Like the Zune may be taking up ground sooner or later (I hope). Only time will tell.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ShimmerStar In reply to Dshark [2007-10-01 15:37:00 +0000 UTC]

oo i forgot about the Whirlpool. good one!

i've never played with a zune, i'd heard some bad things about them, but i suppose that was all first generation glitches....but i'm in love with my iPod a little, so the use of ipod terminology doesn't really bother me.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Dshark In reply to ShimmerStar [2007-10-01 20:29:25 +0000 UTC]

Let me shoot down what your heard about the Zune. Try me. And don't say its bulky, cuz thats true and I accept that.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ShimmerStar In reply to Dshark [2007-10-01 21:39:30 +0000 UTC]

lol i just heard that it was glitchy, and had issues microsoft needed to work out but they released it too early...basically to wait for a 2G one....so i went ahead and bought the video iPod i'd been lusting over as well.

...and that it's bulky

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Dshark In reply to ShimmerStar [2007-10-01 22:23:36 +0000 UTC]

Ehh, it's not so much glitchy as it has crappy firmware restrictions. Most everything works with it, it just cant work as well as it could because of the stupid music industry. 3 days 3 plays sucks. G2 is gonna be out before Christmas apparently though. So we'll see. I love my Zune though, mostly because not a lot of people have them. I <3 black sheep.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ShimmerStar In reply to Dshark [2007-10-01 23:51:01 +0000 UTC]

3 days 3 plays? i think that would drive me nuts.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Dshark In reply to ShimmerStar [2007-10-02 02:34:08 +0000 UTC]

Well its only with wire lessly transfered songs.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Energetic-Innovation In reply to catdevnull [2007-09-28 15:35:56 +0000 UTC]

Wow...

*admires brain*

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

PurpelBlur [2007-09-28 08:30:39 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Chukkz [2007-09-28 08:29:45 +0000 UTC]

233 messages

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

DCZed [2007-09-28 08:18:13 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ryano292 [2007-09-28 07:54:44 +0000 UTC]

looks sexy

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

The-Definition In reply to ??? [2007-09-28 07:54:43 +0000 UTC]

Hmm doesn't seem to be something for Beta Testers.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

The-Definition In reply to The-Definition [2007-09-29 09:46:23 +0000 UTC]

This finally gives me a reason to try to figure out how to convert my cell phone video files.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

zacthetoad [2007-09-28 07:54:00 +0000 UTC]

I'm interested as to how you got your hands on this?


Liking the design though.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

lolly [2007-09-28 07:53:30 +0000 UTC]

damn you catdevnull! You manage to get wind of everything!

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

bibleoftears In reply to lolly [2007-09-29 00:57:06 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

stephi-g In reply to lolly [2007-09-28 13:28:02 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TonioSite [2007-09-26 14:23:15 +0000 UTC]

what's this?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

hikarus In reply to ??? [2007-09-26 06:02:23 +0000 UTC]

What is this ? is this for real ?? and where ? is it a new feature

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

mudimba In reply to ??? [2007-09-25 23:13:28 +0000 UTC]

I've seen that header somewhere before . . .

👍: 0 ⏩: 0


<= Prev |