HOME | DD

cosfrog — Fiddler [NSFW]

Published: 2008-03-26 00:40:16 +0000 UTC; Views: 26237; Favourites: 1030; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description Model: ?

going back and revisiting some older shoots, processing some I missed the first time around.

See more at:
exposingbeauty.com
thefemalecanvas.com

Prints available

** As always, please respect the model in your comments **

© 2008 Jeff Davidson. Unauthorized use prohibited. No permission to manipulate/reference will be given. Do not load image to photobucket or other image hosting site. All models are 18+
Related content
Comments: 107

extremecapture [2009-06-26 05:34:35 +0000 UTC]

Great piece of Art, i love it!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

NetSeawolf [2009-06-10 22:15:56 +0000 UTC]

wow so perfect one !

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

czguadalupe13 [2009-04-14 04:54:57 +0000 UTC]

wow

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

lankaster555 [2009-03-25 21:21:44 +0000 UTC]

Wonderful photo - I must follow violin lessons at once...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ultrafeel [2009-01-18 17:22:10 +0000 UTC]

Holy, that's perfect!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Shadowleaper [2008-11-19 15:43:07 +0000 UTC]

I love the symmetry, it really makes this.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cosfrog In reply to Shadowleaper [2008-11-20 20:55:05 +0000 UTC]

thank you!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Schefer [2008-10-30 04:26:28 +0000 UTC]

Wonderful shot
Very beautiful work

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Laysa [2008-07-20 00:52:45 +0000 UTC]

wonderful!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

PirateRose [2008-07-02 04:34:54 +0000 UTC]

Wonderful shot, and holy cow is her waist tiny. o.o

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ferruh [2008-07-01 14:48:49 +0000 UTC]

oh my god! amazing shot...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

japookins [2008-06-04 13:17:47 +0000 UTC]

awesome tattoo
cute bum
excellent shot

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

jogon [2008-06-01 04:55:45 +0000 UTC]

gorgeous!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MauriceHof [2008-05-15 09:37:24 +0000 UTC]

Now this is what I call: A piece of work!
A Masterpiece.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

palau [2008-05-13 09:18:16 +0000 UTC]

God I wish I had an ass like that.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Bjarki-GD [2008-05-06 11:08:09 +0000 UTC]

Beautiful, makes it somewhat better while hearing my little brother playing the fiddle in the next room now

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

DragonInk7 [2008-05-06 10:57:51 +0000 UTC]

I featured you in my journal!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

lakune [2008-04-11 16:08:57 +0000 UTC]

Is's just soo amazing. I love that simetric shot and softness of her body. The concept is also realy cool..

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

PaigeKay [2008-04-10 00:07:00 +0000 UTC]

One amazing shot, and one beautiful behind. One lucky bow, and a gorgeous nacho. Haha. She's breath taking.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

NetSeawolf [2008-04-08 11:15:25 +0000 UTC]

superb photo tatoo and composition great well donne.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Shy-Too-Shy [2008-04-07 04:52:17 +0000 UTC]

I sooooo need to learn to play an instrument...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cosfrog In reply to Shy-Too-Shy [2008-04-09 20:12:49 +0000 UTC]

how about the flute

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Shy-Too-Shy In reply to cosfrog [2008-04-10 00:15:33 +0000 UTC]

Funny you should mention that, 'cause I HAVE actually been practicing the flute every chance I get!! They say practice makes perfect, and I have been told quite recently that my talents are good enough to make any grown man cry... in a GOOD way!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cosfrog In reply to Shy-Too-Shy [2008-04-10 01:32:01 +0000 UTC]

I do not doubt it

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

angeldelly [2008-04-02 03:05:10 +0000 UTC]

this is simply gorgeous! i dont have a problem with sensuality and sexuality, Im a lady and even I can say this is beautiful! *and No, Im not gay* there is just nothing UGLY or pornographic about this piece, and if you have an eye for art, you can see it too. What Im saying is, some people just CANT see art... yet they have a deviantART account and call themselves "artists".
Cosfrog, you are a true artist.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Riastrad729 [2008-04-01 02:01:02 +0000 UTC]

OK I'm signing up for violin lessons first thing tomorrow morning!

Seriously, very sexy and very beautiful. Great work as always.

Cheers.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

NetSeawolf [2008-03-30 21:45:01 +0000 UTC]

Wowo excelent great wel donne.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Battledress [2008-03-30 20:11:58 +0000 UTC]

Well, I love it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

blueeyeblonde [2008-03-28 10:53:52 +0000 UTC]

Amazing!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Rin56 [2008-03-28 05:30:51 +0000 UTC]

great photo, the lighting and composition is lovely. classical music + classical figure = fantastic.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

polarspike [2008-03-28 01:39:01 +0000 UTC]

This is a beautiful shot, I read that rather large thread and thought it rediculous. Porn is tastless garbage and in no way is this tastless or garbage. Good work!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

LovittGirl [2008-03-27 23:34:41 +0000 UTC]

Very beautiful work, Jeff.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

natas7 [2008-03-27 22:52:24 +0000 UTC]

lovely work, sexy and artful.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

A-positive [2008-03-27 22:42:00 +0000 UTC]

like porn as in 'real life porn'??? or porn as in the candid magic world of purple flyings giant cookies and glowing in the dark rock candies?? (which by the way, one can make very inspired use of lol )
coz i cant see that being close to porn... not even bending towards it!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

BoarFace [2008-03-27 20:04:30 +0000 UTC]

And I see the violin to :]

Great pic!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

juanlove [2008-03-27 17:51:17 +0000 UTC]

I think it's a beautiful photograph, pure and simple.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

juggmaster [2008-03-27 16:29:19 +0000 UTC]

Hello, I love this one. Great lightning, the model has a beautiful shape, perfect simetry. I just don't get people that see this as porn, even more, I don't get people who want to see more to the image than is really there. Anyways, I really enjoy your work and I hope you keep on doing it for a long long time. Cheers mate!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Khameleon01 [2008-03-27 16:01:49 +0000 UTC]

just so you know thefemalecanvas.com has been hacked...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cosfrog In reply to Khameleon01 [2008-03-27 16:02:20 +0000 UTC]

again, thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Xero-Tolerance [2008-03-27 10:52:35 +0000 UTC]

this is beautiful i love the curves and tones

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

NammuAn [2008-03-26 22:53:23 +0000 UTC]

it's porn. bad porn. as in non-artistic and ugly.

👍: 0 ⏩: 5

mercury-666 In reply to NammuAn [2008-03-28 05:53:11 +0000 UTC]

if she was cramming the bow in her box it would be porn. just be quiet.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

gdpr-1688292 In reply to NammuAn [2008-03-27 23:20:28 +0000 UTC]

If this is porn then you're a duck. Go dwindle on myspace or something...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ImAGirlNamedMichael In reply to NammuAn [2008-03-27 18:52:56 +0000 UTC]

Eh...I think you need to go find a dictionary and look up what the word pornography means. Also, I would look up the word art as well, since you obviously are incapable of telling the difference.

Oh, and since you have no DA etiquette training, it is highly recommended that if you don't have any kind of constructive criticism, then you should just move along. Hate comments from ignorant children don't usually pass in this community.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

bulemiczombie In reply to NammuAn [2008-03-27 17:04:49 +0000 UTC]

hey man don't talk to her like that
she takes pics of flowers and spends DAYS editing them in photoshop
it's obvious she's a terribly misunderstood, brooding artist

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

rainbowbarf In reply to NammuAn [2008-03-26 23:55:27 +0000 UTC]

says the person who takes pictures of sunflowers and fucks around with the contrast filter on photoshop.

if you dont like it, then why'd you bother clicking on it? why'd you bother commenting?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NammuAn In reply to rainbowbarf [2008-03-27 01:09:18 +0000 UTC]

because it's waaaay too popular and yet a striking image of bad taste and bad manners. that's why!

just a crack and some shapes and the thought of the *** woman == violin ***?!?

I'm sorry, do I see some discrimination there? I think I do. I think I see plenty. I think I see some grotesque thoughts which kinda make me sick. And if it was just another piece of garbage made by another garbage artist, I would have said, ok, the guy/girl has no brains, it figures...

and you know what... there are pictures on deviantart.com of women put in constrained positions or acting terrified of a sexual aggressor and they don't look nearly half as misogynistic as this one. fully grotesque

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

rainbowbarf In reply to NammuAn [2008-03-27 14:59:18 +0000 UTC]

no, see this is where YOU come in. YOU are the one degrading the model in YOUR head because YOU obviously have a problem with women being depicted sexually. seriously, girls like you piss me off to no end. you're the first to accuse somebody of acting misogynist, yet interestingly enough you're the FIRST to degrade and judge both the model and the photographer when sexuality is concerned. i look at this, and as a woman, i dont find there to be anything misogynist about it. yeah, its a very sexual shoot. so, are women not to be seen in a sexual manner period? god forbid, lets go back to the times where ankles were risque since you it pisses poor little you off.

please, enlighten me since you seem to be the ultimate and almighty judge on what's art and what's not. do you consider the abuse of i see plenty of crap art on this site, but the difference between you and me is that i dont go around clicking at art i dont like and whining out loud about how i dont agree with it. cause guess what? unless on top of your amazing photography skills you also possess mind control, there is no way that you're gonna stop photography that *you* dont like. best way to not have deal with it is by not paying attention to it in the first place.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NammuAn In reply to rainbowbarf [2008-03-28 13:01:46 +0000 UTC]

i'm sorry. i don't find this shot sexual. i don't find it attractive either.

the object of my attention is the picture as a whole. you can't say that if you make a picture of a wrotten corpse looking icky and the picture also looks icky, then you are not supposed to be surprised or say that it's icky cause you are degrading the model, in this case - the wrotten corpse. And you certainly can't say that if you take a picture of a woman and the picture of the woman looks ugly, then it's not your fault as a photographer and that any remarks about the picture are offending the model. This way, every photo won't be criticised from a negative point of view and everybody can be an aclaimed artist. But the IDEA behind my complaint was not at all about the beauty of the shapes, lighting or whatever, but about the beauty of the concept, which I strongly dismiss in the present case.

i have no problem with depicting woman's sexuality(I did that myself) or admiring it(look at my favs and you'll see one, I have a couple others on my hard drive). I, as a woman, am a sexual being and I take comfort in that and I am also very proud of it. I do not however like art-pieces that urge the dumb public to think stuff that ain't part of democracy or that cause waves of discrimination (against women).

It's women like you, who metaphorically **** **** that made/make the woman look inferior and be considered a sexual object instead of a sexual entity/being. The difference is quite HUGE. In the first case, the sexual thoughts and attitude belong to the person that exploits(eg. views) the features of the woman, in the second the thoughts and attitude belong to the woman.

And... about the phenomena you/I/whoever want ceased (at a general level)... I guess that avoiding action against murder/rape/genocide will lead to world peace, following your reasoning...lol

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

rainbowbarf In reply to NammuAn [2008-03-28 13:58:35 +0000 UTC]

*comp is slow so my typing is on a lag and i realized that the typos made my response unreadable. so here it is again:

LMAO.

i cannot believe that you're comparing rape, murder and genocide to a PHOTOGRAPH you dont like.

seriously, whatever ramble you had going on there was completely and ultimate debunked by your own absurdity.

also, i'd like to add that before you allow your own artistic judgement to bash another person's work, take a good look at whatever it is thats in your own gallery. i'll take this picture that required photographic skill and knowledge to your photoshop rape any day.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>