HOME | DD

Couch-Crusader — Backside Attack

Published: 2012-04-21 01:31:52 +0000 UTC; Views: 7636; Favourites: 197; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description The title has nothing to do with this picture unless you want it to. I've just got chemistry on the brain after the exam today

A REACTION FOLLOWING THE SN2 BACKSIDE ATTACK MECHANISM USUALLY INVOLVES LESS STERICALLY HINDERED CARBOCATIONS (FIRST AND SECOND ESPECIALLY)

Ahem. >>

Rarity and Elusive belong to their respective owners oh god don't hurt me

eta: Since ~TakeWalker expressed his disinterest in pony navels after looking at some of SmittyG's art, I decided to indulge him: [link]

eta2: *moronsonofboron was kind enough to sketch out a "halftime" image for this pic while I was working on it Thursday night. It's a little coarse, but endearing nonetheless
Related content
Comments: 59

Winged--Maned--Wolf [2013-02-27 08:16:38 +0000 UTC]

Wow Rarity...just....WOW

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

neko-paul [2012-12-18 21:54:48 +0000 UTC]

talk about playing with yourself hehe

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ThahRadical [2012-11-21 22:10:40 +0000 UTC]

This is just AWESOME! I LOVE THEIR REACTIONS!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Vimbert [2012-09-13 06:42:51 +0000 UTC]

I don't even like Rarity and this is awesome

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ausitn3 [2012-09-13 01:14:52 +0000 UTC]

wait a minute, does this count as masturbation?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Mstrydude In reply to ausitn3 [2012-12-11 23:36:59 +0000 UTC]

Yup.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

mkoch99 [2012-07-18 04:16:32 +0000 UTC]

oh my

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Anonymoose123456789 [2012-06-29 17:42:41 +0000 UTC]

Ahh, synthesis reactions! Second order means that there is most likely a secondary or primary carbocation, usless you have a very strong nucleophile or a very non-polar solvent, in which a reaction will either not happen or even a tertiary carbocation will go through a second order synthesis reaction! Second order means that the rate determining step involved the participation of two reagents!

(I really hope that's correct. It's been a good two months since I've done any organic chemistry. :/ Yay summer break!)

I'm sorry, I love Organic Chem. Yay Rule 63 and "On a Cross and Arrow"!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Alleg1000 [2012-05-11 20:58:04 +0000 UTC]

awwwwwwww

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ownageownz [2012-04-30 05:57:59 +0000 UTC]

i really like her...MANE

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Sammie77lee [2012-04-26 23:29:32 +0000 UTC]

awww rarity and elusive they're the perfect fashion couple

👍: 1 ⏩: 1

KaydenLindsey In reply to Sammie77lee [2020-11-14 17:57:38 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

BB-K [2012-04-25 01:49:33 +0000 UTC]

Oh my. The curtain's open, and when Sweetie Belle sees this, she's gonna, I don't know, until Rarity gets angry at her back!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

RainbowB1itz [2012-04-25 01:07:56 +0000 UTC]

Rarity dosent care if she messes up her mane or tail. Shes in love :3

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

karkovice1 [2012-04-24 12:53:36 +0000 UTC]

Good thing you said that the male was Rarity's persona, if she were a guy.

Otherwise, I would've said that she was having a fling with Shining Armour, Princess Cadence's husband-to-be... and probably unloaded a can of whoop @$$ on you!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

E-man300 [2012-04-22 21:53:42 +0000 UTC]

frisky, aren't we?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

bigdaddycrimson [2012-04-22 15:19:56 +0000 UTC]

now, i wonder what this would look like if someone humanised it

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Fenwolf2003 [2012-04-22 10:14:25 +0000 UTC]

No.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

wolfey180 [2012-04-22 06:11:58 +0000 UTC]

OH MY GOD! THEY'RE NAKED!

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

KaydenLindsey In reply to wolfey180 [2020-11-13 00:30:24 +0000 UTC]

Really dude they are always naked they don't wear clothes are you really that stupid

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

BronyHaterSlayer In reply to wolfey180 [2012-04-22 13:54:33 +0000 UTC]

Naked? Pardon Wolfey, but, they don't usually wear clothes.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

wolfey180 In reply to BronyHaterSlayer [2012-04-22 16:17:03 +0000 UTC]

Haha!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KaydenLindsey In reply to wolfey180 [2020-11-14 17:58:53 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

wildeye99 [2012-04-22 05:55:41 +0000 UTC]

I don't know what to say.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Thundershink [2012-04-22 05:49:23 +0000 UTC]

eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww hehe XD

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

DestinyDecade [2012-04-22 05:47:20 +0000 UTC]

Dang. This is a shock.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Stalc [2012-04-22 05:45:10 +0000 UTC]

what would spikes reaction be...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Punisher143 [2012-04-22 00:57:20 +0000 UTC]


We must ship all the ponies, even if it means shipping them with themselves!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Bairne [2012-04-21 22:20:22 +0000 UTC]

Big part of the perspective being off is that table in the bottom middle there. It looks like the perspective is from standing just beyond it while the rest of the room has a much higher view - as if from/near the ceiling, to me anyway.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Couch-Crusader In reply to Bairne [2012-04-22 18:54:55 +0000 UTC]

Great point! I'll have to keep that in mind in the future, heh

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

templar127 [2012-04-21 13:33:04 +0000 UTC]

That's steamy hot!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Cyberpanda2000 [2012-04-21 08:00:20 +0000 UTC]

What was that fuzz about "not brilliant artist"?
This is even better than the last one, with interesting viewpoint and lovely scenery.
The only negatives... like Gigi said, is that the overall perspective feels slightly off. Can't put my finger on it. May just be the round shape playing with me.
And the kiss feels a bit more like a press-face-to-face.
Their mouths can't possibly connect.
May have been intended to be only a nuzzle, and then it works out.
And that space utilization would make house designers cringe.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Couch-Crusader In reply to Cyberpanda2000 [2012-04-21 08:10:33 +0000 UTC]

More critique! Yes!

Yeah, everything in this picture was pretty much freehanded without any prior thought put into making the perspective work out. The sink and the shower floor can't possibly lie on parallel planes. And I agree that the angle's definitely not conducive to kissing -- you would have been the one to catch that, huh? I appreciate your time. I guess we can settle for a nuzzle and call it good.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Cyberpanda2000 In reply to Couch-Crusader [2012-04-21 10:46:03 +0000 UTC]

Oh, and should applaud for going for a slight difference in size.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

moronsonofboron [2012-04-21 04:47:24 +0000 UTC]

Don't forget the halftime! [link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

DragonWarrior24 [2012-04-21 03:53:36 +0000 UTC]

Awesomeness!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

RainbowB1itz [2012-04-21 03:03:24 +0000 UTC]

Sweetie Belle: Hey Rarity did you see my backpa- Um il just go :l

👍: 0 ⏩: 3

Amelia-Seyruun In reply to RainbowB1itz [2012-04-21 05:47:49 +0000 UTC]

Poor Sweetie Belle.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RainbowB1itz In reply to Amelia-Seyruun [2012-04-21 16:02:00 +0000 UTC]

Lul

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Nbbren In reply to RainbowB1itz [2012-04-21 04:27:38 +0000 UTC]

except i'd have have it end with sweepy in a fetal position traumatized

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RainbowB1itz In reply to Nbbren [2012-04-21 15:59:29 +0000 UTC]

I woulda said sweepy but i think sweetie would have a better reaction.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Nbbren In reply to RainbowB1itz [2012-04-21 16:02:10 +0000 UTC]

Well Blitz more power to you. Me, how would you react if you saw your relative having sex with his genderbender?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RainbowB1itz In reply to Nbbren [2012-04-21 23:26:45 +0000 UTC]

No i think of it this way. If i was Sweepy i woulda been like. ._______________________________. we all knew this was gonna happen.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Nbbren In reply to RainbowB1itz [2012-04-21 04:26:08 +0000 UTC]

no way i came up with that same joke

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RainbowB1itz In reply to Nbbren [2012-04-21 16:02:07 +0000 UTC]

Liez

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Nbbren In reply to RainbowB1itz [2012-04-21 16:02:56 +0000 UTC]

also
How the wedding in the genderbend world?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RainbowB1itz In reply to Nbbren [2012-04-21 23:54:18 +0000 UTC]

It. Was. Disturbing.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Nbbren In reply to RainbowB1itz [2012-04-22 00:02:13 +0000 UTC]

I noticed

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RainbowB1itz In reply to Nbbren [2012-04-22 00:13:17 +0000 UTC]

I mean the only good part was my sonic rainboom but i mean -_-

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

CPLJohnner [2012-04-21 02:50:31 +0000 UTC]

l'amour est dans l'air

👍: 0 ⏩: 0


| Next =>