HOME | DD

crazyIvan969 β€” Spring is over

Published: 2007-06-12 17:04:34 +0000 UTC; Views: 2145; Favourites: 104; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description the path took them to a golden field
the ground was warm and they shared it -
they made love beneath the wind
and the wheaten gold of that field

by ~kastelov
Related content
Comments: 23

z-zaphs [2009-03-09 15:50:34 +0000 UTC]

Featured here: Link

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

arctoa [2009-01-14 10:23:33 +0000 UTC]

This is a nice piece of work with a good use of a narrow depth of field to isolate the subject matter in the foreground. Good stuff, without doubt.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

lucidreamer20 [2008-04-02 11:57:11 +0000 UTC]


featured here: [link]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

CarolineZenker [2008-01-02 17:59:26 +0000 UTC]

SchΓΆn.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

AmberSunset [2007-12-15 16:44:07 +0000 UTC]

Stunning... Poppies are my favorite flowers!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

crichton380 [2007-10-27 10:38:28 +0000 UTC]

wow, i luv the comp and the viewpoint, also the colours are awesome. brilliant job

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

signmeupscotty [2007-10-26 08:32:47 +0000 UTC]

I like the warm lighting and the crispness of the poppies. The red blossoms stand out nice against the yellowish brown background.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

jonathanknowles [2007-09-18 21:44:18 +0000 UTC]

I think that's excellent. I like the composition, i like the warm lighting on the flower and I think I do like the choice of depth of field too. I would like to see one with a deeper field just to compare, but this is a fine shot regardless.

You'd have a fun time cloning out the cables if they were in focus too

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

facehead [2007-06-14 01:21:56 +0000 UTC]

I was very hesitant about my liking of the depth of field. On one hand, the foreground is obviously what you want to stand out (I remember a really good photographer saying that the foreground is the most important part of a landscape photo). On the other hand, it's such a contrast to the colours behind it, and stands taller than it (in the photo's perspective at least), that it would stand out just as well had the out-of-focus-area not been as pronounced. Did you happen to take another shot with a smaller aperture?

Though I would still prefer a slower aperture, it's a really well composed photo, and I definitely like the out of focus buds that are closer to the camera than the main flowers.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

crazyIvan969 In reply to facehead [2007-06-14 08:22:49 +0000 UTC]

finally some critical and though helpful comment...as i look at your gallery, i see that you've got the point to talk about how to take landscape pictures...your's are perfect...ok could be that the blur in the background is a bit too much...hm...let's see i'm going to take another one when I come to this place again with a higher aperture, let's see what comes out! thanks for advise, i really need comments like that!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

facehead In reply to crazyIvan969 [2007-06-16 02:19:07 +0000 UTC]

Mine are far from perfect, I have a long way to go.

But I'm glad my comment helped you.

Re-shooting a scene is a tricky endeavour. I never re-shoot the same place in the same way, nor should I. The way I look at things in life changes daily, and conditions are rarely the same.

You're the same way.

Like in your Sky High photo:

[link]

vs Sky High 2:

[link]

It was the same subject (conditions obviously different), but you shot it in an entirely different way.

Like many things in life work, I believe people get better and better at photography over time from both a technical standpoint, as well as composition-wise. When I look at my galery and weed out a photo I don't like as much as others in the gallery, it's always the one I took furthest from today's date.

Photography is also something that can be worked on when you don't have a camera. You can imagine places you've been to before and how you'd compose a photo of them, or walk through a place entirely new to you and say to yourself "If I had a camera with me, I'd pull out this lens and compose a photo this way with this and this in the photo and not this."

On a technical note, a lot of your photos (not just this one) seem like they would benefit from a higher number aperture. It also makes lenses perform better (but don't go too high). I usually try to shoot with a tripod and have an aperture of between f8-f16.

Your photos also seem like they should be sharpened (in photoshop, Filter>Sharpen>Unsharp Mask).

Here is a decent tutorial on using Unsharp Mask:

[link]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

crazyIvan969 In reply to facehead [2007-06-16 22:21:47 +0000 UTC]

hey i tried higher aperture now, i'm uploading it right now. Take a look and tell me what you think. It's not the same picture, you were right there, but it's similar. This time i used f/10, so let's see what you think of it. I don't know how to put links, but it's called "...and Summer is coming". Check it out!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

facehead In reply to crazyIvan969 [2007-09-22 06:21:37 +0000 UTC]

hey

sorry

i went to europe so i'm replying back over 3 months later

i don't like the new one as much as the other... but it's okay

you've taken some really great photos over the summer

keep it up

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

kastelov [2007-06-12 19:33:40 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Malleni [2007-06-12 17:08:25 +0000 UTC]

mohn ist schon was tolles

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

crazyIvan969 In reply to Malleni [2007-06-12 17:12:51 +0000 UTC]

mooooooooooooohn *g*

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Striped-Flames [2007-06-12 17:06:20 +0000 UTC]

Nice picture...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

mzcurl [2007-06-12 17:06:11 +0000 UTC]

beauty

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

crazyIvan969 In reply to mzcurl [2007-06-12 17:09:49 +0000 UTC]

thank you!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

herbatta [2007-06-12 17:05:32 +0000 UTC]

amazing colours and perspective. well done(;

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

crazyIvan969 In reply to herbatta [2007-06-12 17:12:27 +0000 UTC]

*proud*

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

herbatta In reply to crazyIvan969 [2007-06-12 17:15:19 +0000 UTC]

yes, you should be(;

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ZombieFuric [2007-06-12 17:05:30 +0000 UTC]

This is amazing, love it, great photography

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0