HOME | DD
Published: 2005-04-14 00:25:09 +0000 UTC; Views: 6059; Favourites: 42; Downloads: 459
Redirect to original
Description
The Mature Content flag gets flipped back on. The reason: Frontal Nudity.It'll be such for the next two pages as well, I'm afraid, including a scene that definitely needs to be worked over so I won't get into trouble with DA. Even though I'll shoot the scene from the sholders down, it'll be clear as to what Scarlet will be doing 8O (Note: I remember the rule of thumb being that no visible sexual organs, and no images that should belong to any magazine from Larry Flint, otherwise, just flip up the 'Mature Content' flag and everything be kewl.
Scar may no longer be in the dream sequence, but she's still daydreaming, it appears.
Related content
Comments: 10
DreadedOne131 [2014-04-03 19:07:31 +0000 UTC]
An interesting part, where Scarlet thanks Jim for his sacrifice, but apparently Jim is still inside somewhere in the new Scarlet's mind.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DreadedOne131 In reply to DreadedOne131 [2015-06-27 19:02:14 +0000 UTC]
Still has impact, even after I read further into the story
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
rocketllama [2008-02-23 07:29:14 +0000 UTC]
And too much pent up stuff in David's life comes out again.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
seaweedprincess [2006-11-26 05:08:33 +0000 UTC]
I don't think it counts as frontal nudity unless their's nipples or un-clothed cameltoe.
Also, how'd she get naked all of a sudden?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
GroatMan [2005-04-14 00:33:51 +0000 UTC]
tis a good drawing but dose that get a MA rating? i mean the show breats on tv and just blur the nip-age and this strip contains no nip....i think u know where iam going wit this
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
davidfoxfire In reply to GroatMan [2005-04-14 00:47:17 +0000 UTC]
I err on the side of caution when it comes with the MA flag. As you know there are some stories in DA where someone gets banned because they posted something pornographic. Not that I would post such items online, I don't want to have a scene misread and driven to the point that I get such a treatment. Add to the fact that there are people out there who would report a DA violation in my name _out of spite_ and you come up with my liberal use of the MA rating.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
DreadedOne131 In reply to davidfoxfire [2014-04-03 19:09:42 +0000 UTC]
You are probably right to do so. They seem to be cracking down on anything out of the ordinary these days. I am thinking it's time to head for somewhere else...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
davidfoxfire In reply to DreadedOne131 [2014-04-03 20:32:28 +0000 UTC]
To me, I wonder whatever it's time for me to move on because I get called on as a misogynist because of what I fave--not what I post--on DeviantART. I can't seem to like a picture of a princess, maid, bunnygirl or anything else without some feminist putting me down in the comments somewhere. If it weren't for some friends I collaborate here, I would've left DA a long time ago.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PorygonV In reply to davidfoxfire [2014-04-04 16:22:51 +0000 UTC]
All right, that's it.
I think you're over-exaggerating a bit there.
People don't call you misogynistic because you favorite maids, bunnygirls, princesses and Shantae. People call you that because without your collaborators' direction, you have a history of creating female characters that either exist to cater to your inner desires or lack any sort of characterization other than 'android programmed specifically to love only the protagonist', 'that one's a dreamy, boy-crazy flirt' or 'this one faints at a sudden noise' et cetera. They all share a common trend of putting their goals -- if they even have any -- aside to help the lead character, who historically, has generally been male (unless that goal is specifically to help the main protagonist, which isn't much better).
What you are doing is subconscious, and others (like Kev, Eivii and even collaborators like me!) are trying to show you that. I was the only one who provided proof of your work being similar to the content in your favorites folder, and you're blowing it way out of proportion by saying that random nameless feminists are on constant watch for your activity.
For the record, I'm a guy, and most decidedly not a feminist. I am however, here to help you see and overcome these behaviors, in order to become a better creator overall. If you would like, I can prove a long-standing history of this train of thought; I can even send it to you privately if you prefer.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
KriegsaffeNo9 In reply to davidfoxfire [2005-04-14 00:58:27 +0000 UTC]
A suggestion: To ensure minimizing the chances of getting smack't down, do what centuries of practice and tradition suggest: implication. Show the vile shadow on the wall but not the naked-porn-star-with-a-sock-puppet-becau se-you-coudln't-afford-making-a-monster- suit-when-you-hired-a-naked-porn-star-to -play-him/her/it monster. It'll save you a world of pain and (depending on what's being implied) several barf bags when you're working under guidelines.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0























