HOME | DD

derkert β€” amorous object

Published: 2010-04-25 02:07:48 +0000 UTC; Views: 1371; Favourites: 34; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description It is what it are!

Digital collage by edvard derkert 2010
Related content
Comments: 52

derkert In reply to ??? [2010-08-01 08:42:20 +0000 UTC]

Miss Bunny!

No nit really. Just hard working.
Thanks the same!

edvard

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

VampiricBunny In reply to derkert [2010-08-03 09:47:15 +0000 UTC]

keep it up, edvard.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Izaaaaa [2010-05-15 22:30:17 +0000 UTC]

this makes me smile!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

derkert In reply to Izaaaaa [2010-05-16 08:06:35 +0000 UTC]

smile!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

iram [2010-05-09 14:57:45 +0000 UTC]

bravo, ed!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

derkert In reply to iram [2010-05-09 16:22:40 +0000 UTC]

Thanks il!
Ed

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

pinkpank [2010-05-04 09:14:20 +0000 UTC]

hihi!! great!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

derkert In reply to pinkpank [2010-05-04 09:31:00 +0000 UTC]

hi hi thanks

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

hamptonrodriguez [2010-04-29 01:23:37 +0000 UTC]

wonderful

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

derkert In reply to hamptonrodriguez [2010-04-29 07:35:15 +0000 UTC]

Thanks Hampton!
ed

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

goatheadcorp [2010-04-27 11:59:01 +0000 UTC]

simply amazing

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

derkert In reply to goatheadcorp [2010-04-27 13:04:20 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

ed

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

djailledie [2010-04-27 04:09:01 +0000 UTC]

Does it comes with feelings?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

derkert In reply to djailledie [2010-04-27 06:30:56 +0000 UTC]

No the user will have to pretend feelings!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

djailledie In reply to derkert [2010-04-28 04:20:59 +0000 UTC]

I would be surprised if he does not manage to have some.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

derkert In reply to djailledie [2010-04-28 06:36:49 +0000 UTC]

Works quite well too. And sometimes pretended feeling becomes real feeling. And that can be quite dangerous!

Now I am getting real scared!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

RichardLeach [2010-04-26 15:24:15 +0000 UTC]

It's utero-phallic, Ed - phallo-uterine - derkertian!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

derkert In reply to RichardLeach [2010-04-26 17:20:03 +0000 UTC]

Yes – and maybe breasts!


edvard

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

RichardLeach In reply to derkert [2010-04-26 17:26:36 +0000 UTC]

Metallo-mammo-utero-phallic!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

derkert In reply to RichardLeach [2010-04-26 17:34:48 +0000 UTC]

Yepp! You are 110 % right there on the spot and on time too!
ed

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

RichardLeach In reply to derkert [2010-04-26 21:16:21 +0000 UTC]

Well, I know an MMUP symbol when I see one!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Tordo [2010-04-25 16:06:19 +0000 UTC]

Indeed this could bring pre-childhood memories, when do childhood starts anyway? when you're born, or when you're still inside your mother?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

derkert In reply to Tordo [2010-04-26 17:22:30 +0000 UTC]

I dont know if the baby in the mothers womb can perceive the uturus?
The question is valid, but then you come from a catholic tradition!



ed

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Tordo In reply to derkert [2010-04-27 04:13:23 +0000 UTC]

Good point, well, technically speaking the fetus can only perceive a few things, in the last months that is, when his development is almost complete, but obviously he doesn't have any recollection of it since consciousness takes longer to develop.

I guess I should be more aware of the catholic part of me, so it doesn't "take over" that easily.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

derkert In reply to Tordo [2010-04-30 07:01:56 +0000 UTC]

It is OK; you were catholic even as a foetus – taking in the incense in the church.

And I think I am very protestant in my thinking. Lutheran and all!


edvard

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Tordo In reply to derkert [2010-05-01 04:05:40 +0000 UTC]

Damn incense! I knew it was a purpose!

Really?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

KatDiestel [2010-04-25 09:42:07 +0000 UTC]

what the hell makes them think of unborn life here???

i know what half of them are and i like them, too

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

derkert In reply to KatDiestel [2010-04-25 12:32:27 +0000 UTC]

Them males?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

KatDiestel In reply to derkert [2010-04-25 13:55:37 +0000 UTC]

yes, maybe it's them males only ...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

derkert In reply to KatDiestel [2010-04-25 18:37:17 +0000 UTC]

well I thought it was a sex toy!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

landkee [2010-04-25 08:16:05 +0000 UTC]

uterus. lovely.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

derkert In reply to landkee [2010-04-25 12:32:09 +0000 UTC]

I didn't think of it – but I do get you point!

ed

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

landkee In reply to derkert [2010-04-26 18:54:17 +0000 UTC]

fits perfectly.
me thinks.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

derkert In reply to landkee [2010-04-26 19:03:22 +0000 UTC]

youthinks methinks goodthinks

and happily they lived ever after!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

PEN-at-Work In reply to derkert [2010-04-25 12:50:33 +0000 UTC]

thats what my Lennart Nilsson comment implied too...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

derkert In reply to PEN-at-Work [2010-04-25 12:56:55 +0000 UTC]

yes!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DouglasHumphries In reply to derkert [2010-04-25 19:01:16 +0000 UTC]

..me too.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

PEN-at-Work [2010-04-25 07:13:46 +0000 UTC]

Lennart? Lennart Nilsson!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

derkert In reply to PEN-at-Work [2010-04-25 12:31:15 +0000 UTC]

Jag tror den/det Γ€r utanfΓΆr kroppen.......

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

PEN-at-Work In reply to derkert [2010-04-25 12:54:21 +0000 UTC]

[link]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

derkert In reply to PEN-at-Work [2010-04-25 12:56:33 +0000 UTC]

I know. I have actually made a few drawings of that thing. But I did not think of it!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

PEN-at-Work In reply to PEN-at-Work [2010-04-25 12:54:33 +0000 UTC]

en vas!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

JabLab [2010-04-25 05:00:41 +0000 UTC]

Mirakel Lennart med en kreativ och
humoristisk touch.
Cool och anatomiskt upplysande.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

derkert In reply to JabLab [2010-04-25 12:30:35 +0000 UTC]

Upplysande?

Tack!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JabLab In reply to derkert [2010-04-25 14:44:30 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

kparks [2010-04-25 02:44:14 +0000 UTC]

Whatever it are, I like it.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

derkert In reply to kparks [2010-04-25 12:29:58 +0000 UTC]

That is very fine with me!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

DouglasHumphries [2010-04-25 02:15:27 +0000 UTC]

..what a mind you possess Ed... I'll bet you even surprize yourself once in awhile.....hmmm,pardon me -I need to call my girl friend for some reason.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

derkert In reply to DouglasHumphries [2010-04-25 12:29:35 +0000 UTC]

Your girlfriend can explain what it is?

Thanks!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DouglasHumphries In reply to derkert [2010-04-25 15:31:52 +0000 UTC]

...naw --I get the drift --( or my drift anyway ).....er ,Welcome !

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>