HOME | DD
Published: 2006-03-01 14:30:00 +0000 UTC; Views: 13099; Favourites: 312; Downloads: 171
Redirect to original
Description
Group : Read the comment =karth made about this stampMade by : =karth
Link to : [link]
Original location: [link] please
Related content
Comments: 79
Nitrogyn [2010-07-29 07:57:41 +0000 UTC]
Better photographers on Flickr than on dA. Overall.
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
seqizz [2010-03-09 23:14:05 +0000 UTC]
is there any kind of organization (like a group) which we can promote this?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Toiim [2009-10-09 09:36:03 +0000 UTC]
I am Tom. I am agreeing with you about the DeviantArt an Flickr thing.
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
CameronSanati [2009-08-10 22:06:42 +0000 UTC]
I totally agree. I had a flickr account for about two seconds and I realized DA was for artistic photos and drawings while Flickr was basically just for sharing em. So i deleted it. *Faved*
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
yumireiku [2009-04-29 20:11:32 +0000 UTC]
so i cant take a picture of my dog in the yard and post it here, but someone can paint a soup can and have it hung in a museum?
hmm...............
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
gravityproductions [2008-11-27 07:22:14 +0000 UTC]
Removing from favs because I never knew if flickr was good or not until now. My guess was it was like bebo or something. I took a quick glance at it and first impressions is it's not that bad from what people make it out to be...
We shall see...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Be-pa [2008-10-06 11:54:36 +0000 UTC]
Even tho its not flickr's fault that everyone there is uploading photo's that dont make sense.. BUT i totally agree !!
DA is to show the world your art , talent.. not for showing ppl photo's from your everyday life that dont make sense
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Be-pa In reply to Be-pa [2008-10-06 11:56:03 +0000 UTC]
Sry i added it to my faves frm here.. the link is broken
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
pgdaisy [2008-07-15 19:34:51 +0000 UTC]
Some photos are art, some photos are shit.
Thats the reason of FLICKR existing
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
kkart In reply to pgdaisy [2008-07-16 18:22:17 +0000 UTC]
Ya sure and that's why Getty is partnering with flickr and NOT DA huh?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Kirite [2008-06-15 23:31:24 +0000 UTC]
Yes guys, pictures someone else drew can't be put on deviantart
Ahhh what a beautiful stamp (will fav at original...if I can find it)
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
gethsemane-butler [2008-04-06 07:36:27 +0000 UTC]
People seriously need to stop using dA as their personal online photo album.
THERE IS A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ART AND CRAP. No one gives a damn about your pets or your brats' birthday parties. That's crap. We don't care about crap. WE CARE ABOUT ART.
Rant is done now.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Renfield286 In reply to gethsemane-butler [2008-06-11 10:59:08 +0000 UTC]
Art (and crap) are in the eyes of the viewer.
[link] <- my point
-=R286=-
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Ridikul [2008-02-19 18:57:05 +0000 UTC]
I disagree with the point that deviantART is more professional. Just click "Browse" if you don't believe me.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
dbestarchitect In reply to Ridikul [2008-03-15 23:52:32 +0000 UTC]
That's not deviantART's fault
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Ridikul In reply to dbestarchitect [2008-03-16 17:46:03 +0000 UTC]
I never said it was deviantART's fault? It wouldn't be flickr's fault either if they weren't more professional.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BluesKirby [2008-02-14 02:40:42 +0000 UTC]
.......Sorry,deviantstamps...
I have to fav this one since the original dev dissapeared.
GOMEN!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Drunk-Bu6ree8 [2007-12-10 17:04:21 +0000 UTC]
TRUE!! XD
was goin to make a journal about this
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
UnfeeelinG [2007-08-28 23:16:29 +0000 UTC]
i agree .. but every website has salbyat'h w ejabyat'h ... flickr was much easier to communicate with pple .. i think deviantart .. has more pro photographers n its much more about the art of photo rather than " look at my top its dior :S "
*spork18 every photographer deserves a chance n deserves to hav comments to change there pix to the better... we dnt hav the rite to judge pple .
Peace
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
kkart [2007-08-13 14:05:30 +0000 UTC]
Flick has many more pro photogs on it than DA. And no Fanart/Fury/Anime /end of story
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
photolitherland In reply to Marimenala [2007-11-03 05:35:28 +0000 UTC]
a photo website full of crappy photographers that think they are bad ass
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
spork18 [2007-07-24 22:05:04 +0000 UTC]
OMG I agree.
I have seen sooo many very amateur photos that are simple things like bad shots of pets, people at a birthday party, and people who REALLY don't know how to turn of flash when taking someone's picture up close. it's all...white.
And people who make really, I mean like godawful things in Paint! some people can make really nice stuff but really.. you're not going to get comments or faves.
Just my two cents ._.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
iva-is-me [2007-06-08 23:41:40 +0000 UTC]
I disagree, both have good sides to them. And nobody can be a pro right from the start.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
photolitherland In reply to iva-is-me [2007-11-03 05:36:22 +0000 UTC]
yes but people posting shots of kids at birthday parties and or crappy photos of pets and such should not be on either website
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>

























