HOME | DD

deviantStamps — deviantART is NOT Flickr stamp

Published: 2006-03-01 14:30:00 +0000 UTC; Views: 13099; Favourites: 312; Downloads: 171
Redirect to original
Description Group : Read the comment =karth made about this stamp (see original location below).
Made by : =karth
Link to : [link]

Original location: [link] please over there.
Related content
Comments: 79

Cleverpelt [2014-12-01 00:54:07 +0000 UTC]

Flickr?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

thejps1997 [2013-03-02 11:26:19 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Jammy-P [2011-02-10 02:10:09 +0000 UTC]

Agreed! I just wish deviantart had better servers

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

venom9999 [2010-10-08 11:45:57 +0000 UTC]

true

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

philsidek [2010-09-02 11:37:22 +0000 UTC]

heheh

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Nitrogyn [2010-07-29 07:57:41 +0000 UTC]

Better photographers on Flickr than on dA. Overall.

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

seqizz [2010-03-09 23:14:05 +0000 UTC]

is there any kind of organization (like a group) which we can promote this?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Toiim [2009-10-09 09:36:03 +0000 UTC]

I am Tom. I am agreeing with you about the DeviantArt an Flickr thing.

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

CameronSanati [2009-08-10 22:06:42 +0000 UTC]

I totally agree. I had a flickr account for about two seconds and I realized DA was for artistic photos and drawings while Flickr was basically just for sharing em. So i deleted it. *Faved*

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

summert5364 [2009-08-01 18:09:21 +0000 UTC]

agreed. agreed.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

damongoewie [2009-06-12 08:34:26 +0000 UTC]

you are right

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Princess-Peachy [2009-06-10 21:37:00 +0000 UTC]

What's a flickr?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

thejps1997 In reply to Princess-Peachy [2013-03-02 11:29:53 +0000 UTC]

[link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MtlcQatar [2009-05-03 14:06:10 +0000 UTC]

thanks
[link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

yumireiku [2009-04-29 20:11:32 +0000 UTC]

so i cant take a picture of my dog in the yard and post it here, but someone can paint a soup can and have it hung in a museum?
hmm...............

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ApocalipticFaint [2009-02-09 21:46:41 +0000 UTC]

I AGREE!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

gravityproductions [2008-11-27 07:22:14 +0000 UTC]

Removing from favs because I never knew if flickr was good or not until now. My guess was it was like bebo or something. I took a quick glance at it and first impressions is it's not that bad from what people make it out to be...

We shall see...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Be-pa [2008-10-06 11:54:36 +0000 UTC]

Even tho its not flickr's fault that everyone there is uploading photo's that dont make sense.. BUT i totally agree !!

DA is to show the world your art , talent.. not for showing ppl photo's from your everyday life that dont make sense

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Be-pa In reply to Be-pa [2008-10-06 11:56:03 +0000 UTC]

Sry i added it to my faves frm here.. the link is broken

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

BinDubai [2008-07-28 07:53:53 +0000 UTC]

hate flickr people

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

pgdaisy [2008-07-15 19:34:51 +0000 UTC]

Some photos are art, some photos are shit.

Thats the reason of FLICKR existing

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

kkart In reply to pgdaisy [2008-07-16 18:22:17 +0000 UTC]

Ya sure and that's why Getty is partnering with flickr and NOT DA huh?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Kirite [2008-06-15 23:31:24 +0000 UTC]

Yes guys, pictures someone else drew can't be put on deviantart

Ahhh what a beautiful stamp (will fav at original...if I can find it)

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

gethsemane-butler [2008-04-06 07:36:27 +0000 UTC]

People seriously need to stop using dA as their personal online photo album.

THERE IS A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ART AND CRAP. No one gives a damn about your pets or your brats' birthday parties. That's crap. We don't care about crap. WE CARE ABOUT ART.

Rant is done now.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Renfield286 In reply to gethsemane-butler [2008-06-11 10:59:08 +0000 UTC]

Art (and crap) are in the eyes of the viewer.

[link] <- my point

-=R286=-

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

dbestarchitect [2008-03-16 00:00:02 +0000 UTC]

Other one gone, here ^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

draegyn-eyed [2008-03-01 01:13:18 +0000 UTC]

I'd fave there, but the link is broken...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Ridikul [2008-02-19 18:57:05 +0000 UTC]

I disagree with the point that deviantART is more professional. Just click "Browse" if you don't believe me.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

dbestarchitect In reply to Ridikul [2008-03-15 23:52:32 +0000 UTC]

That's not deviantART's fault

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Ridikul In reply to dbestarchitect [2008-03-16 17:46:03 +0000 UTC]

I never said it was deviantART's fault? It wouldn't be flickr's fault either if they weren't more professional.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

dbestarchitect In reply to Ridikul [2008-03-16 20:36:54 +0000 UTC]

what?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Ridikul In reply to dbestarchitect [2008-03-16 22:09:01 +0000 UTC]

..Exactly.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

dbestarchitect In reply to Ridikul [2008-03-17 01:26:24 +0000 UTC]

XD

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

BluesKirby [2008-02-14 02:40:42 +0000 UTC]

.......Sorry,deviantstamps...
I have to fav this one since the original dev dissapeared.
GOMEN!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ScribbledNotes [2008-02-08 06:39:52 +0000 UTC]

Love it. So using it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

aldhanhani [2008-01-21 23:42:59 +0000 UTC]

YES YES YEE !

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

atre [2008-01-09 14:46:48 +0000 UTC]

btw a tip, dont browse all images, refresh explore.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

atre [2008-01-09 14:43:09 +0000 UTC]

yeah flickr has less wrist cutting.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

catu182 [2007-12-27 02:22:13 +0000 UTC]

Sorry for faving it, the link doesn't work

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Drunk-Bu6ree8 [2007-12-10 17:04:21 +0000 UTC]

TRUE!! XD
was goin to make a journal about this

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

sh-o-o-sh [2007-12-08 15:04:46 +0000 UTC]

so true

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

UnfeeelinG [2007-08-28 23:16:29 +0000 UTC]

i agree .. but every website has salbyat'h w ejabyat'h ... flickr was much easier to communicate with pple .. i think deviantart .. has more pro photographers n its much more about the art of photo rather than " look at my top its dior :S "

*spork18 every photographer deserves a chance n deserves to hav comments to change there pix to the better... we dnt hav the rite to judge pple .


Peace

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

kkart [2007-08-13 14:05:30 +0000 UTC]

Flick has many more pro photogs on it than DA. And no Fanart/Fury/Anime /end of story

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Marimenala [2007-08-04 23:23:15 +0000 UTC]

what's flickr?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

photolitherland In reply to Marimenala [2007-11-03 05:35:28 +0000 UTC]

a photo website full of crappy photographers that think they are bad ass

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Marimenala In reply to photolitherland [2007-11-03 15:01:04 +0000 UTC]

ah... i see

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

spork18 [2007-07-24 22:05:04 +0000 UTC]

OMG I agree.
I have seen sooo many very amateur photos that are simple things like bad shots of pets, people at a birthday party, and people who REALLY don't know how to turn of flash when taking someone's picture up close. it's all...white.
And people who make really, I mean like godawful things in Paint! some people can make really nice stuff but really.. you're not going to get comments or faves.

Just my two cents ._.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Bntal3nabi [2007-06-28 08:23:15 +0000 UTC]

yeah it's not Flickr

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

iva-is-me [2007-06-08 23:41:40 +0000 UTC]

I disagree, both have good sides to them. And nobody can be a pro right from the start.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

photolitherland In reply to iva-is-me [2007-11-03 05:36:22 +0000 UTC]

yes but people posting shots of kids at birthday parties and or crappy photos of pets and such should not be on either website

👍: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>