HOME | DD

Distantstarr — YF-23

Published: 2013-02-02 19:09:52 +0000 UTC; Views: 6480; Favourites: 118; Downloads: 138
Redirect to original
Description Two YF-23 super-cruising among the clouds. I hope you like it.
Credit:
Background [link]
Related content
Comments: 19

OseanSoldier [2016-09-27 05:58:02 +0000 UTC]

I absolutely love this plane. First heard about in when I was playing Ace Combat 5 and fell in love with it ever since. I just love the way she looks. Personally I would have loved to see the F-23 over the F-22.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Vkdogg009 [2014-03-07 03:07:11 +0000 UTC]

Fantastic work! Great sense of speed!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Distantstarr In reply to Vkdogg009 [2014-03-07 06:38:07 +0000 UTC]

thank you

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Lindale-FF [2013-11-05 23:11:18 +0000 UTC]

I still think the F-23 should have gone into service. Take for example the F-16 and F-18. They were competing for which would go into service, but in the end, they both did. Turns out, the F-18 was much better suited for the Navy's needs, while the F-16 was much better suited to the Air Force's needs. And even earlier than that, the Hurricanes would attack the bombers while the Spitfires would engage the fighter escorts. No reason the F-23 cannot serve side by side with the F-22.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Nikkayla [2013-03-05 04:58:00 +0000 UTC]

Love the effect for the background, it makes them really pop out Thanks for using my stock!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Distantstarr In reply to Nikkayla [2013-03-06 03:23:19 +0000 UTC]

thanks to you my friend

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Nikkayla In reply to Distantstarr [2013-03-07 12:23:50 +0000 UTC]

No worries

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Voyager168 [2013-02-05 02:36:39 +0000 UTC]

I like this one

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Distantstarr In reply to Voyager168 [2013-02-05 03:37:51 +0000 UTC]

thank you

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Voyager168 In reply to Distantstarr [2013-02-05 08:13:35 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Meema [2013-02-03 03:14:50 +0000 UTC]

It's such a shame that the USAF went with the Raptor instead. I certainly think they made the wrong decision.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Distantstarr In reply to Meema [2013-02-03 12:39:51 +0000 UTC]

shape-wise I think the Raptor is sexier

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Meema In reply to Distantstarr [2013-02-03 23:36:56 +0000 UTC]

Sexiness is irrelevant. Capability is what matters.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Distantstarr In reply to Meema [2013-02-04 00:46:56 +0000 UTC]

by more sexy I meant more aerodynamic, which I believe the F-22A is more so. And beautiful planes have always been better.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ArrayOfStars [2013-02-02 19:18:21 +0000 UTC]

Very nice!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Distantstarr In reply to ArrayOfStars [2013-02-02 19:22:50 +0000 UTC]

thank you

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Zak05 [2013-02-02 19:10:45 +0000 UTC]

Awesome!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Distantstarr In reply to Zak05 [2013-02-02 19:11:47 +0000 UTC]

I appreciate it

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Zak05 In reply to Distantstarr [2013-02-02 19:18:01 +0000 UTC]

You're very welcome!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0