HOME | DD

Equiliari In reply to XelfrepuslaX [2014-12-18 10:20:05 +0000 UTC]

Thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

XelfrepuslaX In reply to Equiliari [2014-12-18 13:18:00 +0000 UTC]

Most welcome

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Equiliari In reply to dbrought [2013-01-15 06:01:41 +0000 UTC]

Go on ahead

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Equiliari In reply to HaseoYashimora [2011-03-30 20:56:41 +0000 UTC]

If I get free time I might do it for fun, however so far I am under quite a heavy load. Dont get your hopes up too much .

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HaseoYashimora In reply to Equiliari [2011-03-31 02:10:33 +0000 UTC]

lol its smaller then this and thanx its for my noval im righting

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Equiliari In reply to cyde- [2010-11-13 12:57:17 +0000 UTC]

Good choice
A story/potential book.
Its about the last human descendant in the universe.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Equiliari In reply to QAuZ [2010-11-12 09:55:24 +0000 UTC]

Thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

QAuZ In reply to Equiliari [2010-11-12 09:56:51 +0000 UTC]

YW.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Equiliari In reply to Militant-Jester [2010-11-09 09:19:37 +0000 UTC]

Don't look directly at the sun! D:
It will hurt your eyes

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Militant-Jester In reply to Equiliari [2010-11-09 15:12:00 +0000 UTC]

NOW you tell me!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Equiliari In reply to danarogon [2010-11-05 23:10:04 +0000 UTC]

Sadly I contain insufficient science to make an accurate model that could work . I do believe it is possible but it will require much more science than I am capable of.
(Yes, I am aware of the odd yet strangely cute use of the word science)

Anyways...
For now, this relative model showcasing the big and important stars, planets and moons within the system will be all I can present.
And thanks for the

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

danarogon In reply to Equiliari [2010-11-06 00:15:08 +0000 UTC]

Try to download universe sandbox its very nice but try to find some place to download v1 because universe sandbox 2 isn't that good, and it does not have a very useful glitch instead of buy it you can just give the some random code, and it will accept it has the real pass, belive it unverse sandbox its a very nice universe simulator, and make all sort of stuff and it mit help you in your next Science project

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Equiliari In reply to danarogon [2010-11-06 19:05:50 +0000 UTC]

Ooh yes, looks like a pretty interesting program
Thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

danarogon In reply to Equiliari [2010-11-06 19:15:01 +0000 UTC]

you are welcome

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Equiliari In reply to slifer2534 [2010-11-05 23:16:18 +0000 UTC]

Aye, if the map was a true to scale one, sadly I do not contain enough science to do that (), so this relative model is all I can come up with.
I blatantly "excuse" it with; "you are not completly screwed untill you pass the event horizon", even thou it has a bit weaker gravitational pull than the star it once was.
But I am sure that with enough power of science(!), a working model containing the elements presented in the relative map could be produced.
Unless there is a photoshop filter for that particular task *checks*

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

wrathmonkey In reply to Equiliari [2012-09-21 19:26:22 +0000 UTC]

Still a cool picture, though.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

wrathmonkey In reply to Equiliari [2012-09-21 19:26:03 +0000 UTC]

I'm afraid not. Even a regular black hole would still exert massive influence on an unbelievably large scale around it. The planets would likely be shredded immediately, and it would begin to "feed" off of the stars, especially considering their proximity (even if you expanded it to scale).

The stars would then do one or more of a number of things: novae, supernovae, collapse, etc. None of which the planets could theoretically survive through, if they had somehow survived the black hole.

As for the "screwed" thing: you're screwed long before you ever reach the event horizon. Loooooooooong before you reach the event horizon.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Equiliari In reply to wrathmonkey [2012-09-21 23:18:45 +0000 UTC]

Over time this will most likely happen, yes. But so far, its all pretty stable. Trust me .

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Equiliari In reply to jeturcotte [2010-11-05 14:01:46 +0000 UTC]

Thanks
And sure. It is obvius that sizes on the planets, stars, moons and orbits are waaaay off, much like the images of our solar system you can find online due to the exhebitious nature. Still; I want to hear.
And don't you dare to be gentle!

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

jeturcotte In reply to Equiliari [2010-11-05 14:41:37 +0000 UTC]

On that note, though, I do appreciate that you're allowing for things like 'mini-goldilocks' zones around gas giants and stuff... not enough people acknowledge these possibilities, methinks.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

jeturcotte In reply to Equiliari [2010-11-05 14:39:26 +0000 UTC]

Haha, alright... and yeah, this is a MAP, so it's perfectly okay to exaggerate sizes so, you know, relative to one another, the planets aren't smaller than pixels; no I was mostly just noticing star types, star ages, and the propensity for these to eliminate any possibility of life... all mixed together in one system. It's not that complex systems cannot occur... isn't there a seven star system out there somewhere in the direction of the big dipper, after all? Issue there is those stars are all the same age and differ really only in their respective masses. In yours though, you have an elderly central star surrounded by young stars that, given their colors, ought to be similarly or even more massive (which would have made them the center) as well as much younger... maybe they're all captures? (anything is possible!)

The blue guy also probably ought not to have life around it... stars that heavy and excited tend to live very short lives, typically less than half a billion years (some much shorter.) Even the prototypes for pre-cellular life on Earth took about that long to come about and that was given a much calmer and friendlier scenario than that blue guy could provide. I mean, don't take me TOO seriously since we as a specie still have so much to learn. But based on what little we do know, this map seems unlikely.

And there's gravity to consider... a direct collision is not at all necessary for the black hole (or any of the extra suns) to wreak vicious havoc... assuming that BH is solar-massed, it would be throwing planets off their orbits coming even within 10s of AUs of anything else. Anyhow, that's just the parts that I picked up on. I'm not saying that a BH can't coexist within a system, but it's first hundred million years or so would probably be extreme disruptive... any planets here, assuming they survived, would probably be undergoing a fresh onslaught of dozens or hundreds of comet impacts a year given the BH's initial and potentially recurring path through the system's collective OORT cloud.

Hah, more than I intended to type. It just seemed to me that you are perusing more than just art here, so I had a hard time keeping quiet; and like I said, the best of us as a specie are still just learning about this stuff, so don't worry too much!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Equiliari In reply to jeturcotte [2010-11-06 00:35:38 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for the extremly thurough reply . Yes, to a degree I am pursuing more than just art, granted concept wise it is still in its infant stages. Story wise, its pretty developed.
I do however have to give an applause to deviantART and its members (for now mainly you and GalacticKitten). When developing a story in a field you probably should not enter () feedback is pure gold. You have just given me this large pot of pure gold.

I was intrigued by what you said about multiple star systems. I have always imagined 4 or 5 to be max of what we have discovered (but was open for more) but lo and behold, there are actually TWO (!) systems they say have 7. Nu Scorpii and AR Cassiopeia. All of them with only B class stars. The universe will never cease to amaze me .
Maybe this will make me want to evolve the Umojomahar system further? I do like the idea of binary stars within the multistar system.

So yeah, most of the stars in the Umojomahar system would be captures by the Umojomahar. How such diverse stars got so close to each other?... Mwell creepishly enough I already have a sort of an explanation for that in the story this artwork is based on. It also adresses life around Crertiermahar (yes, its name is a mouthfull, but thats cause its the most awesome and exotic star in the system!).

The "seed" of life on Elmwar and Cricera was placed there artificially by someone not from the Umojomahar system (Doink, spoilers!). Due to the conditions of Elmwar life was "helped" on its way to be able to survive, however not beyond that point. Thus it is currently the thin film of goo.
Cricera is another story, it is "protected" by its immensive magnetic field, thus life is able to evolve under relative "normal" conditions.
The basis of the story is the storm that effectivelly divides the planet in two, creating two completly different evolutionary lines.
The short lifespan on Crertiermahar is certainly something that I must address.

The black hole, well... I don't actually need it story wise, it was just something I put in there because of... well... rule of cool!
But I do believe it can be addressed and be made plausible with the cunning use of Hawking radiation to minimize its size (It is after all depicted to have come from a star much larger than the Umojomahar if you consider the blackness its event horizon). Althou this is probably something I should address AFTER reading "A briefer history of time".

Thank you again for the pot of gold!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

jeturcotte In reply to Equiliari [2010-11-06 01:16:26 +0000 UTC]

Thanks... artistic license is ALWAYS an option; I just wanted to make sure that if you were going for good science that you have access to it! Still, take even what I say with a grain of salt... our best scientists are constantly being surprised, too. Captures are always possible... Proxima centauri is a capture... or perhaps a near capture as we're not ENTIRELY sure yet if it will actually say with alpha centauri a+b. Galaxies like ours are also the result of galactic collisions and galactic cannibalizations, and while star collisions are virtually unheard of, they will have many near misses between not only unrelated stars, but stars from entire other galaxies as well... and the closer you get to a galactic core, the more pressed together stars are, so odds increase there as well. There's tons of opportunity for you to get really creative out there, so keep at it!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Equiliari In reply to GalacticKitten [2010-11-05 08:28:56 +0000 UTC]

Hehe, at least I got the other ones kinda right ^_^.
Thanks for the heads up (and the collection ) *changes*

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

GalacticKitten In reply to Equiliari [2010-11-05 08:39:19 +0000 UTC]

The other ones are fine! And the orbits are realistic as well!

Anyway, you're welcome

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

GalacticKitten In reply to GalacticKitten [2010-11-05 07:35:41 +0000 UTC]

Oh, and sorry if I sound like a jerk or a know-it-all, it really is a beautiful image!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Equiliari In reply to Arcalian [2010-11-04 19:23:47 +0000 UTC]

Big version where text is visible here: [link]

It seems the blue star is the most attractive to space farers thus far

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Arcalian In reply to Equiliari [2010-11-04 19:25:46 +0000 UTC]

Perhaps one of the moons of Phileai.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0