HOME | DD

ether — synth - WS

Published: 2011-08-29 00:52:54 +0000 UTC; Views: 5626; Favourites: 36; Downloads: 802
Redirect to original
Description total disregard for chemical balance in favor of making pretty patterns. whole thing trussed up in photoshop...patterns n all.
Related content
Comments: 25

am1d [2014-04-19 11:11:30 +0000 UTC]

nom nom, and i like every one of them

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Ausgewanderte [2012-02-04 22:09:20 +0000 UTC]

chemist here, I love your background and I am using it now at work and on my laptop.
thank you for the hours you put into this. I love it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ether In reply to Ausgewanderte [2012-02-07 17:50:18 +0000 UTC]

that's super fab. i'm a chem nerd who doesn't get chem all that well so to have an actual chemist use my completely inaccurate wallpaper image is, well, cool.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

18Queens [2011-09-11 11:27:46 +0000 UTC]

Wow This looks fantastic. It's a great example of science inspired artwork. The shape is very creative. The background is cool, it reminds me of chalkboards (I imagine a scientist working on his equations).

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ether In reply to 18Queens [2011-09-12 18:02:48 +0000 UTC]

didn't think of the background a la chalkboard but yieah, it does remind me of that now...!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

413East [2011-09-05 06:47:44 +0000 UTC]

I really wish I knew what you did about that program...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ether In reply to 413East [2011-09-05 17:37:17 +0000 UTC]

what program? photoshop?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

413East In reply to ether [2011-09-06 00:55:26 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, Photoshop. How to make dem shapes, and make them uniform, and make them colors and glowing. I wanna learn things!

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

ether In reply to 413East [2011-09-06 03:31:06 +0000 UTC]

forgot to explain the background ...

once i had created the design using the custom shapes, i just selected it and filled with a gray shade slightly lighter than the background color. then scaled that layer huge and blurred it a bit. this way it won't distract from the already busy looking main graphic.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ether In reply to 413East [2011-09-06 03:24:58 +0000 UTC]

google is my/your friend.

1 - find a shape you want to use. in my case, i looked around for a decently clean pic (as in clean lines) of a crown ether. save it as a jpeg.
2 - take the jpeg into photoshop and use the pen tool to create a path around it.
3 - change the path into a custom shape: [link]
4 - now that you have a custom shape, create a new doc where you can replicate that custom shape however you want (resize, rotate, blah blah blah).
5 - to color it, just select the shapes' layer, create a new layer and then fill with either gradient or solid color. i used a gradient obviously.

the rest is all layer blending effects, layer effects, blur/sharpen filters, and layer masks. there are a bunch of ways to create the glow effect that you can google for...i used a combination of ways until i liked the result. playing with layers is key.

the most time consuming part was creating the custom shape and then using the custom shape to make a design.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

413East In reply to ether [2011-09-06 23:27:57 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for this! I appreciate it muchly!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

alltruist [2011-08-30 19:29:47 +0000 UTC]

Crown ethers. Nice!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ether In reply to alltruist [2011-08-30 19:45:36 +0000 UTC]

wassup fellow chem nerd.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

alltruist In reply to ether [2011-09-02 03:13:00 +0000 UTC]

Holla! Chemistry can be quite beautiful.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

elischiff [2011-08-29 01:58:46 +0000 UTC]

How did you make this??

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ether In reply to elischiff [2011-08-29 03:22:38 +0000 UTC]

found nice clean graphics of the chem diagrams online (woohoo google image search!). took those graphics into photoshop and created custom shapes from them using the pen tool and path options. then resized them and rotated each to my liking. add gradient, selective blur, sharpen, etcetra, and voila.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

elischiff In reply to ether [2011-08-29 04:04:10 +0000 UTC]

That's wonderful. The results are great The only thing I think is a tiny bit off is the circles, it may be better next time to use the ellipse shape tool to make those as opposed to the pen tool. Also do you happen to know what exactly paths are as opposed to shapes/vectors? I've always been confused by that.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ether In reply to elischiff [2011-08-29 04:19:36 +0000 UTC]

i didn't want perfect circles actually, sorta was going for the hand drawn look so i kept the circles "bumpy".

paths are created from the pen tool and you can adjust its shape from various points. until you commit the path to a shape, it's totally flexible so my guess is that it's vector-based. shapes are raster and not vector since any changes (scaling, distort, etc) can pixelate it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

elischiff In reply to ether [2011-09-01 18:51:03 +0000 UTC]

True, makes it more natural. Thanks for the clarification, so given that, how would one make a scalable vector based circle for example that could be upscaled infinitely? I assume given your response that the circle tool would create a path? Or is it that the shapes are paths until they are rasterized?

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

ether In reply to elischiff [2011-09-01 20:18:49 +0000 UTC]

oh and, in answer to your question " how would one make a scalable vector based circle for example that could be upscaled infinitely?", the answer is -- use illustrator.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

elischiff In reply to ether [2011-09-01 21:35:54 +0000 UTC]

Ah! Need to buy that...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ether In reply to elischiff [2011-09-01 20:09:08 +0000 UTC]

the ellipse (circle) tool creates a shape. but you create a path from that shape. or even create a path directly using the shape option. a shape itself is not a path -- once created, it's rasterized.

conversely, if you create a custom shape from a path, then you can scale that shape any size you want at the beginning.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

elischiff In reply to ether [2011-09-01 21:36:28 +0000 UTC]

Damn adobe and their confusing systems!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ether In reply to elischiff [2011-09-02 02:20:50 +0000 UTC]

just play with the tools and you'll see. that's how i learned.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

elischiff In reply to ether [2011-09-06 01:32:02 +0000 UTC]

Definitely! Have been doing that, and it's working out just great

👍: 0 ⏩: 0