HOME | DD
fbuk — C06
[NSFW]
Published: 2011-10-25 04:14:29 +0000 UTC; Views: 47900; Favourites: 1331; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
panelRelated content
Comments: 79
Obvious fake tits are obvious. And this particular modal seems too use the same facial expression a lot :\ There's no emotion here.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
My eyes just fell out at the instance of her beauty ...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
apparently so did your dick
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
wow nice photos!
but why she's always have the same facial expression? .__. what a pity...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
What's with all the large, fake tits? Whatever happened to the natural look?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I love how the shirt, color wise stands out against everything else, shes beautiful, but besides her body, the color of the blue just pops! Amazing work!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
forget the wood look at the crafting of that body xD
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
FAQ #565: You prohibit the submission of 'pornographic imagery'; what do you consider this to be?
It is not pornography as defined by deviantART's policies.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Maybe not "porn" by DA's policies but porn none the less.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Actually no, it's called glamour photography and is considered a valid artform.
Most people assume it's porn because it's most commonly seen in mens magazines. but that does not make it porn by any stretch.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Dude, you have your opinion, good for you. I think it is an obvious type of porn. So back off. I'm not going to fight over this. Mainly because its annoying that the same arguments are always made and its a waste of my time.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
pay no mind to the haters..you have an amazing body and your a great model..keep up the good work..very sexy!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Another great photo.
Great work.
This can be classified as a glamour portrait, as $dxd pointed out.
Beauty in itself is a form of art, is it not? Fake or not, the photo it its entirety, not only the model, is a form of art.
If you choose to leave comments, at very least keep them constructive.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Great eyes and body position! I love the blue against the background!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
perfect woman.. =/ i highly doubt unless you like your women with Saline breast implants
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
It's great image as always. It's also awesome how many people love to hate your work, clearly you must take it as a sine of respect.
Keep the good work coming.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
This is a glamour portrait. The shot focus and positioning is within it's means. She's amazingly beautiful and I think she has lovely breasts. As a longtime DA member I think it's fine so please refrain from leaving negative comments if you have nothing nice to say!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Honestly, I'd like this a lot more if her tits weren't faker than my Grandma's teeth.
There's nothing "glamorous" about fake tits, sorry brah.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
No. Shit.
Thanks for stating the obvious!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Not art, just a slut wanting sex. Stop posting stupid crap on DA!
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
this is not crap...this is glamour and expresion...if you dont like it...just keep your mouth shut...the author puts you in the same pose and you wont fit her shoes...so hush your beak
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
That sort of comment is not at all appropriate. You might not appreciate the image but there is no reason to call a model a slut.
Please do not do that again.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Sorry. I'm just really tired of seeing garbage on the front page.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
THIS IS ART!! And you should know it vary rude to call anyones art "garbage", no matter what your OPINION is.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
forgive her...she's just jealous..she cannot even match her...its natural..females fight for male's attention....just ignore her
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Excuse me, but... What does this picture to be called "Glamour Portrait"? I only see operated breast. This isn't glamourus! It's only a explicit nude pose!
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
I agree. There are so many "Glamour Portraits" on DA, where there is no glamour, just naked chicks. Some people seem to be far away from reality!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>