HOME | DD
fbuk — CA4
[NSFW]
Published: 2011-04-08 02:19:32 +0000 UTC; Views: 52289; Favourites: 1646; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
Always seems a shame resizing images to 900x.. Its crazy the detail resolved F16 and beyond...crazy megapixels
[link]
Related content
Comments: 46
I love this model!!! Rawr Fbuk what is her name?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
fake G's.. dont need to photoshop
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
But the breasts looks very strange. Maybe to much silicone?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yeah their silicone so what?, nothing strange about them, seen worse.....
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Natural looks much better and more beautiful.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Good googly moogly! A breathatking photo of a gorgeous woman!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
her boobs... they're defying gravity just like Elphaba from Wicked...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I'm really starting to question some of the content on DA...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I don't like the implants at all. I think she'd be much more beautiful without them.
They make her look so generic. Her face is fine, it's nice, so why does she need fake breasts?
No, I'm not saying this 'cus I'm flat, I'm a 36DDD.
All I'm saying is that I think she'd be much more appealing without those.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I agree. People need to start realizing that there isn't just one definition of beauty...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I agree! they don't even make sense... I don't find
boobs that are just a bubble attractive, they have
to form to the females body to be attractive.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Fake or not they are impressive... =3
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
bleh whatevs I was quoting stewie from family guy >_>
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
and i have to chime in that if you were the one standing there taking this picture, you would care less if they were fake or not. i do agree a lot of fake boob jobs are blehhh to say the least and kind of unattractive, but i really think this model can be an exception.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Nice shot, but can you clear something up for me? How is this a glamor portrait, as opposed to an Artistic Nude?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Artistic nude is more... artistic, whereas this shot is only a high quality shot of an incredibly sexy woman. To me this is not really "art", it's erotic photography. It's kind of an art anyway, but based on men's desires and I feel really sad too regularly see those kind of pics within the most famous ones, because you only have to show a naked (or mostly naked) woman to have loooots of views etc.
- Nonetheless this is a nice shot, and far more artistic that some other ones we can find on DA that has nothing to do on it (which are only porn). -
👍: 0 ⏩: 3
words of wisdom , da is realy overrun by these
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I agree with your assessment of Artistic Nude vs Glamour. This is definitely a good shot, as well. Sadly, there are so many webcam and cellphone shots of one's own genitalia littering this site these days, and even more sadly there are hordes of people who don't know any better than to worship crude shots like those as art. Glad to see another artist of quality on here.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
It always blows my mind how the majority of users on dA appears to be female, yet I regularly see 30% of the frontpage filled with... this. I can only assume the majority of visitors are silent lurkers or something.
*sigh* So many pictures that people don't look at because of the picture itself, but because of the model. Even seen some questionable teen webcam content on the frontpage last month ago or so. >_>
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
*__* 
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I agree! I would LOVE to see her much more close up! God, she's frick'n gorgeous!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
