HOME | DD
fbuk — ca2-3
[NSFW]
Published: 2012-04-23 21:52:31 +0000 UTC; Views: 51213; Favourites: 1876; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
doorwayRelated content
Comments: 63
wow she is one hot babe,looking forward to seeing more of this girl.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Your photo sets are always lovely. Do you do individual, private shoots as well?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Wow. Good work.
Any nod to the subjects in your work? Links/names? I see a lot of models and photographers crediting each other on DA. Are you not into that?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
is there no credit given to the model or am i just missing it? any one know who this is?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Charlie Atwell, UK fitness model.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
It's hilarious how many times I see people in fbuk's (and other erotic nude photographers) complaining about how this isn't art, but then 90% of them have tons of nude digital images in their favorite galleries. So what's the deal, it's okay to sit there and look at some Bleach characters boobs but when someone takes a picture of real person it's not art. I know it's said numerous times, but no one is forcing you to click on his gallery, and the tiny thumbnail that you saw in the front page isn't a good enough excuse to say it's being flooded in front of you.
For fbuk, I've always been a fan of your work. Not because of the nude girls but because the pictures are helpful in creating references for digital art (like Comic books since we all have seen this same pose being taken by some female hero at some point).
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
im not saying it was photo altered. shes got to have implants or something.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
of course she has had a boob job
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
that seems uncomfortable. mine actually are that big but they dnt sit up that high cuz they r heavy. all the women in my family have huge boobs. Big boobs r a pain in the ass.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
im not saying it was photo altered. shes got to have implants or something.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I have seen some of your other works in here and i think that they look good and really artistic. I have also seen some nudist-kind artistic pictures in here and thought that they are very good. Now don't get me wrong. She is beautiful. But i think that a picture like this doesn't suit to this kinda site. :0 Again this is just my opinion and it probably wont change anything but since i had the opportunity to write it here i thought i just might write it ^^ and sry if i made someone upset ._. again i think this is great picture and i know that i have myself chose to look at this picture etc... So that's why i'm giving "neutral" to this photo 
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
A respectable comment! Do you believe deviantART should deny some art? This glamorous image is classified as erotic art, after all.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Hmm well... ._. i just though that this picture is slightly more erotic than artistic :0 but after all :> everyone have different opinions ^^ ty for not getting mad at me, since so many ppl do when i say something like what i said to you.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
That's where you and I have to disagree! This is pretty mild compared to some of the other stuff found in the erotic art category. I once saw a depiction from the 1800s of a small man performing an oral service on a large woman. In some cultures, simple pictures of the penis are considered art. They represent potency. I don't want to see pictures of some dude's junk on deviantART's welcome page, but it does happen, and it is a legitimate art form.
Oh, and I wish you didn't have to thank me for not getting mad. x.x I'm civilized!
... to a point. xD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
anyways yes... i thanked you since it is really rare that ppl dont attack you if you say something they don't wanna hear or idk what else it could be... irl they could hear that i have proper voice and that i look straight into their eyes when i talk and that i still respect them at all matters... but pffft... internet... i just love and hate it at the same time lol XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
good lighting,details,colors.
she's so super hot and sexy & I like her a lot. good pose,facial expression too
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Ooooh, how so very, very artistic! I really love how you captured her beautiful face and enhance her conspicuous curves!
......... Please take horrific piece down. That belongs to a porn site, not a side for ART.
Thank you, over and out.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
This photograph is classified as erotic art. deviantART allows that art form. Maybe you should find a different site, or petition deviantART to accept some art, but deny others. You're not accomplishing anything by targeting the artists allowed to be here.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Hi, I made a digital painting based on this photo [link] hope you like it
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
gorgeous eyes n black hair ! goes great with her lingerie
I love dark hair
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Those panties ROCK! Looks like the bra matches too. She's beautiful, yes, but the lingerie helps make the woman.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Okay, these are starting to get very boring... do something more creative! She's wearing the same things and always showing her breasts. "Woopy-doo".. its over used and its easy to find these type of pics in any porn site or even on Google images. Get creative and make these photographs look more like art.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
"Get creative and make these photographs look more like art." You meant to say make these photographs look more like your idea of art. As bored as you may be, the fact remains the above image is classified as erotic art. I'm sure there's many people getting aroused and lusting after the model. That's what erotic art is supposed to incite within others, after all.
Considering you're but one opinion of many on the Internet, which doesn't seem to be largely shared among the people following the photographer's work, I doubt the aforementioned photographer is going to start obeying your demands. Maybe you should stop following this work and look for something you find more stimulating. You're obviously not getting what you want here.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Why are you attacking me sir? I was simply offering advice, I like erotic art like anyone else. I was simply stating that he can try to do something a bit new with his models instead of having them in poses that are always seen. Because let us all get serious, these poses are not original at all. That's what I meant about "Get creative and make these photographs look more like art"
And please know that I will always post my opinion on things, so don't waste your time on telling me to leave because I'm not going anywhere.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I'm sorry to hear you took it as an attack, but that really wasn't my intention. At all. I never demanded you leave, either. I merely made a suggestion since you seem so unhappy with this photographer. As far as the pose being original or whatnot, I can't really say. I don't typically follow this kind of art. To me, it's new. It's better than I can do with a camera, too.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Lol well come on man, get to know a person before you attack them (and sorry but to me it felt like you attacked me)
I am very very VERY fond of erotic art. Hell, I draw erotic poses of women myself and I enjoy looking at pictures of other photographers pictures as well! Though I am a very picky person. I have many friends who take pictures like this, and also took a video editing class where I watched a group of men do a six month erotic photography shoot in class for a video. Poses like this are simply overused and I was trying to give some advice. The poses can still be the same, but placing them in different areas will be a lot more nicer. (Along with trying to avoid the trolls that claim he's downgrading women with the whole "Women have to stay at home and be in the kitchen")
Oh well, just know that I am not putting him or his art down, I was simply recommending trying something new to make something more original.
(I'm half asleep... so if some of this doesn't make sense then sorry... I'm too lazy to reread this comment XD)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Again, I'm sorry you feel that way, and I apologize if my words upset you. I don't attack people - especially when I know them.
If I attacked you, though, then you most certainly attacked the photographer. My intention was to simply write a strongly-worded comment in response to your own strongly-worded comment. You compared his art to porn, called it boring, and stated it lacked creativity. You insulted his work three times. Any way you look at it that's putting him or his art down. Harshly. Is it criticism? Perhaps. Is it constructive? Not at all. You simply told him to, "do something more creative!". If he already thinks this is creative, then that doesn't help at all. It's just mean.
If you really want to help, tell him what he could do to make it more creative. Maybe find out if this is something the model wanted, too. You say you know what you're talking about, so put that knowledge to good use. That'd be a lot better than simply insulting the work.
Regardless, the pose may be commonplace, I don't know, but the last I checked ten different paintings of the same subject matter could all be considered art. I can't see why that doesn't apply to photos. To someone who doesn't typically follow photography, and hasn't seen what you've seen, this would be an artistic portrayal.
Oh, and rest assured everything you said made perfect sense. I now understand what your intention was and I have an idea what you think is creative. I hope you can understand where I'm coming from - which isn't anywhere negative!
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
I for one thing experimentation with lighting ( color, angle, and intensity) might make for some truly nice results, and much more interesting photographs. Strait shots like these are okay here and there, but I like others like some variety.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
photography of naked chicks is just what it sounds like ... photography of naked chicks
granted there may be some "process" to getting a good porn shot, but at the end of the day porn pictures posted on an art site is still just porn
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Why do I see Lyndsey Lohan when I look at this picture. Don't get me wrong, I love the hotness.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
a little too perfect..... :/
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
| Next =>