HOME | DD

fieldsofjoy — Rainbow Tutu Reflections [NSFW]

Published: 2006-01-06 03:05:43 +0000 UTC; Views: 2147; Favourites: 47; Downloads: 365
Redirect to original
Description Photographer: ~quietchildae
Model: Me

The rainbow tutu rules your school - made by me and ~pirate-dolly
Related content
Comments: 47

DavidFolkie [2006-01-10 04:59:20 +0000 UTC]

This is lovely...what like the most about it is how the pose is so relaxed and natural in feel... It could almost have been a candid shot taken without your knowledge. Brilliant!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

PartyAnimal1245 [2006-01-08 14:01:33 +0000 UTC]

Beautiful, just beautiful!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

badassball [2006-01-07 15:08:05 +0000 UTC]

loadsatequila - I can see ur point n r allowd ur own

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

loadsatequila In reply to badassball [2006-01-07 15:13:12 +0000 UTC]

thankyou, i presume your previous comment was at quietchildae's attack on my gallery?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Nyx-Valentine In reply to loadsatequila [2006-01-07 21:41:59 +0000 UTC]

Attack? What attack? I made a comment that I disliked your technical approach to photography. The -same- thing you have done to every photo here with Joy. There is no attack here, only the honest opinion that you say I should stomach from you. It really does grate on the nerves doesn't it? To be told that all your work is bad? Frankly, you work isn't bad, it just isn't to my tastes. And I had the grace, and well meaning, to leave -you- a compliment. I do think you're a talented sculpter. You on the other hand, leave nothing but criticism.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

loadsatequila In reply to Nyx-Valentine [2006-01-08 01:48:18 +0000 UTC]

good come back, although we can all read what you said, you said my art was shallow in the same way a teenager would say "am i bovverd? you are wrong" you attacked my entire gallery, i commented on one photo! you were well out of line!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Nyx-Valentine In reply to loadsatequila [2006-01-08 07:46:42 +0000 UTC]

No. I'm not. Now. I've given up on this, and after this, I'll no longer be replying to your comments. Please leave me alone.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

badassball [2006-01-07 14:54:58 +0000 UTC]

Art is about self expression there is no right and wrong way to portray it. The reason there are so many varieties in types of art is because everyone is unique. Sometimes the most effective pictures are the simplest. Neway didn't ur mum ever tell you if you don't have anything nice KEEP YOUR BIG TRAP SHUT.

Art should be enjoyed and valued no matter what it looks like, btw i like this one shows inner beauty

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

badassball [2006-01-07 14:53:34 +0000 UTC]

Art is about self expression there is no right and wrong way to portray it. The reason there are so many varieties in types of art is because everyone is unique. Sometimes the most effective pictures are the simplest. Neway didn't ur mum ever tell you if you don't have anything nice KEEP YOUR BIG TRAP SHUT.

Art should be enjoyed and valued no matter what it looks like, btw i like this one shows inner beauty

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Nyx-Valentine In reply to badassball [2006-01-07 21:39:45 +0000 UTC]

By the way....Art is in the eye of the beholder. I didn't call his work unartistic, I said that -I- did not like it for technical reasons. Nothing wrong with it as a piece of art. Stay out of things that you don't know anything about, and try not to misread, misconstrue things so often, ok? I'm glad you like the photo.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

loadsatequila In reply to Nyx-Valentine [2006-01-08 01:08:34 +0000 UTC]

if you attack someones work because you cannot accept a bit of honest critique you are going to get this, you cannot just shout your way into being considered perfect. You are proving yourself to be someone who is used to getting their own way by snarling at all those who disagree with them, i agree with badassball, she should speak her mind, there are so many people disagreeing with you on your attack, all you can do is tell them to stay out of it! does that not say you are being ignorant to opinion? i grew out of telling people to stay out of arguements when i was 12, yet you are arguing in a public domain and cant handle peoples opinions

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Nyx-Valentine In reply to loadsatequila [2006-01-08 01:11:49 +0000 UTC]

Dude. Give up. I'm frankly not concerned what other people involve themselves with, I just have no wish to hold a multiple person arguement over something that should have been between yourself and me. Now. I gave you an out, I closed my end, but you still replied. Please, just go away.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

loadsatequila In reply to Nyx-Valentine [2006-01-08 01:45:25 +0000 UTC]

this is a very different angle than you started with! you cannot possibly expect to attack someone wrongly and then expect to be right all the time, people have got involved as they have deemed you to be wrong in what you did, and as of yet no one has agreed with you, you should at least apologise for the personal attack

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

mrshan [2006-01-07 12:31:52 +0000 UTC]

. .loveit!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

loadsatequila [2006-01-06 15:31:35 +0000 UTC]

my only concern with this one is i dont feel the photographer has captured you as well as i have seen others do in the past. It all seems too easy if that makes sense, almost as if there was no actual time taken to contemplate the pose or the composition

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Nyx-Valentine In reply to loadsatequila [2006-01-07 11:25:56 +0000 UTC]

So, I check out what people have to say on my model's deviations. This image is up on my page as well, but I like to know what everyone thinks.

And some people leave me constructive criticism that I take to heart, and consider. Other people, such as yourself, leave random criticism that offers no room for improvement.

As I glance through your gallery, I don't notice anything stunning. I could leave harsh comments on your work that offered you no chance to improve either. Frankly, your work is rather shallow. You have very little variety, and your lighting is very simplistic, and adds little to the photo. It doesn't do your models justice.

Now I'm sure that you think the dark shadowy images are just great, but to quote you "I don't feel that you the photographer has captured your models as well as I have seen others do in the past. It seems as if no actual time was taken to contemplate the pose or the compostion." Now, I paraphrased a bit, but that seems pretty accurate to me.

Not helpful is it? Really kinda....grates on your nerves a bit.

Now. A slightly more acceptable comment would be "I don't feel this image is as well thought out as some of the others from this series." or perhaps, "I don't like this image as well as some of the others from this series, though I do like {insert here} -this- about it."

I don't appreciate random attacks on my work. I get tired of them really.
It boils down to, as it -always- does, if you dislike my work with Joy, or any of my work, feel free to click the back button, and don't look.

You, as an artist, are not someone who I would look to for an opinion. Personally, I'm not a fan of your work, nor do I feel that you put much time or effort into it to justify my respect in that regard, though you do seem to be a talented sculpter. As such, I have no real interest in your criticisms. So, to repeat myself, if you don't like it, please, don't look at it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Laughalotcrazy In reply to Nyx-Valentine [2006-01-07 14:13:41 +0000 UTC]

Daaamn man. That was kinda out of line Attacking his pieces is no way to handle a teeny two line critique. It wasn't even a critique on you, but on your photographer.

Hmm... Yeah no need to be stickin' my nose in places they shouldn't be, but that was pretty low. If you disliked his comment you could've found a better way to tell him, instead of coming at his works for no reason.

And obviously you don't like to know what everyone thinks, considering you wrote out this entire insult at a single two-lined comment.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Nyx-Valentine In reply to Laughalotcrazy [2006-01-07 21:43:50 +0000 UTC]

I just re------read that.

It wasn't even a critique on you, but on your photographer.

I -am- the photographer. *Gwendelin-Artanis , who's page and deviation you are commenting on, is the model. I have every right in the world to respond.......

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Nyx-Valentine In reply to Laughalotcrazy [2006-01-07 21:33:54 +0000 UTC]

Wow. Given that this wasn't between you and I, I'm not sure where you're coming off saying anything. At no point did I -attack- his images, I gave him my opinion, same as he did mine. Also, this was not his only piece of critique, just the one I wrote the longest response to. Give again, that you are not aware of the full situation, please, stay out of it.

And I don't mind hearing what people think, provided it's constructive. He has informed my model that I am a no talent photographer, and she should not work with me. Constructive? No. Incredibly insulting and rude? Yes. I was quite polite, given the background, that again, you didn't know.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

loadsatequila In reply to Nyx-Valentine [2006-01-08 01:12:42 +0000 UTC]

ok you have invented this conversation about no talent! does that make you sound better? does that make you right that you can spill lies about my conversations with the model? what makes you think that i would ever say that anyone had no talent? everyone is talented, it is a realisation of talent that makes Art. I take real offense to this as you are spilling lies about all my ideals on life! aregue all you want but never ever quote me against my principles

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Nyx-Valentine In reply to loadsatequila [2006-01-08 01:14:06 +0000 UTC]

Please. Just go. Away. I'm no longer interested in arguing against your closemindedness. Some very talented published wellknown photographers are fans of my work, so really.......Not too worried about what you think.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

loadsatequila In reply to Nyx-Valentine [2006-01-08 01:31:11 +0000 UTC]

well done congratulations on the notoriorty

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Nyx-Valentine In reply to loadsatequila [2006-01-08 07:48:47 +0000 UTC]

I really couldn't resist (I'm a glutton for punishment I suppose) but thanks!!! It's great being liked.

-Note the fucking sarcasm, please.-

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Laughalotcrazy In reply to Nyx-Valentine [2006-01-07 21:53:22 +0000 UTC]



Okay buddy if you think that was polite that's great

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Nyx-Valentine In reply to Laughalotcrazy [2006-01-07 21:55:17 +0000 UTC]

I never said I was polite. I said I was -quite- polite given the situation, and that this was no where near as harsh as it could have been.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Laughalotcrazy In reply to Nyx-Valentine [2006-01-07 21:58:42 +0000 UTC]

Nice playing the words there.

👍: 0 ⏩: 3

loadsatequila In reply to Laughalotcrazy [2006-01-08 01:04:16 +0000 UTC]

i agree, i think this is someone who should be ignored as they feel they have to fight the world to feel important, thankyou for being a voice of sanity as others have been yet she still wants to argue, best left alone to shout in an empty room if you ask me

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Nyx-Valentine In reply to Laughalotcrazy [2006-01-07 22:25:39 +0000 UTC]

By the way...how old are you? *raised eyebrow* You don't look old enough to be viewing this image anyways.......Just a thought.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Laughalotcrazy In reply to Nyx-Valentine [2006-01-08 01:55:58 +0000 UTC]

!!! Wow. I love this.

I just love it when people try to insult you with a number.

LIEK OMFGZ I'M OLDER... ME OLD+YOU YOUNG = YOU STUPID.



I suggest you act your age

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Nyx-Valentine In reply to Laughalotcrazy [2006-01-08 07:46:06 +0000 UTC]

Yo. Don't care....Why do you? After all, if it's just a number, why do you care if I know? I wasn't insulting you, I was honestly curious, as I have serious issues with those that are underage looking at my work. The whole, it's slightly illegal thing. Ya know?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Nyx-Valentine In reply to Laughalotcrazy [2006-01-07 22:21:36 +0000 UTC]

Use the reply button please. Words are important, especially in context. Again, you don't know the full of the situation, so please stay out of it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

loadsatequila In reply to Nyx-Valentine [2006-01-07 13:54:59 +0000 UTC]

you have completely misread my intentions with my comment, i am sorry you have taken it as a personal attack. There are some of your works that i like and i just saw this one as being a bit calm thats all. Please note that i made that comment on this piece, not the entire series and certainly not to be related to all your work

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Nyx-Valentine In reply to loadsatequila [2006-01-07 21:37:10 +0000 UTC]

No, this may not have been. Telling my model I had no talent, and she shouldn't work with me sure as hell was. So is critiquing every piece we did together...That's a bit more targeted don't you think? Also, as I have said before, technical critique has no place on the model's page.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

loadsatequila In reply to Nyx-Valentine [2006-01-08 01:00:59 +0000 UTC]

ok lies, i never ever said you had no talent, dont spill lies as that is slander, people have opinion, you decided to jump for the throat without contemplating what i actually said, PEOPLE WHO READ THIS I NEVER SAID THAT THE PHOTOGRAPHER HAD NO TALENT AND I CHALLENGE HER TO PROVE THIS! look at her response to a two line critique and make your own mind up. You are sounding (and no offence intended) as an agry teenager who feels that they have a lot to prove, i like the model and what she is doing but sorry i dont want anymore converse with you as you are coming across as somewhat obsessive on making your stance as being 100% right all of the time and you are really a waste of my time, my critique was a contemplation for the model not for you to get all defensive about

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Nyx-Valentine In reply to loadsatequila [2006-01-08 01:07:04 +0000 UTC]

As a comment on the technical aspect of the photo, it is for me to reply to as the photographer in question. So bugger off yourself. If you dislike my stance, don't look at my work. Thanks, bye. Oh, and I'll forward you a copy of your conversation, though not here, k?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

loadsatequila In reply to Nyx-Valentine [2006-01-08 01:41:43 +0000 UTC]

"Telling my model I had no talent" that is a lie! and everyone should know that you lie to tey and make yourself out to be the victim

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

badassball In reply to loadsatequila [2006-01-07 15:13:29 +0000 UTC]

This is no need to make personal attacks, if someone doesn't like work then tats fine, but don't make it personal, my comment bout keepin trap shut was aimed at quietchildae, not evry1 will like all ur pieces but if u cant handle criticism then u shudn't invite people to comment and give their ideas

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

loadsatequila In reply to badassball [2006-01-08 01:51:43 +0000 UTC]

no if you speak in a public domain you should expect other people to see what is said and allow them a voice! this is not a private thing! badassball's voice is as valid as yours or mine

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Nyx-Valentine In reply to badassball [2006-01-07 21:35:31 +0000 UTC]

As with another comment on this page, you do not know everything going on. Please stay out of it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Sublime-Steve [2006-01-06 15:06:28 +0000 UTC]

that gazebo looks wet and cold lol

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TALRi [2006-01-06 07:52:22 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Bro-Harl [2006-01-06 04:54:04 +0000 UTC]

A Classic pose & A Colorful Flair Wonder-riffical!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

JimKirk [2006-01-06 03:30:01 +0000 UTC]

great colours and you're beautiful.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

JimKirk [2006-01-06 03:29:53 +0000 UTC]

great colours and you're beautiful.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

soundassembler [2006-01-06 03:23:21 +0000 UTC]

what is your obsession with that damn tutu !!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

fieldsofjoy In reply to soundassembler [2006-01-06 03:29:27 +0000 UTC]

HEY! The tutu rules.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

soundassembler In reply to fieldsofjoy [2006-01-06 14:12:06 +0000 UTC]

maybe you should wear some wings with it.....geez.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0