HOME | DD
FreakyComics — Hulk
#avengers #hulk #jackkirby #marvel #marvelcomics #stanlee #hulkmarvel #marvelsuperhero #marvelavengers #avengersmarvel #hulkavengers #avengershulk #hulkshehulk
Published: 2015-01-30 03:54:07 +0000 UTC; Views: 777; Favourites: 12; Downloads: 4
Redirect to original
Description
Displayed before your very eyes is the Incredible Hulk, the monstrous alter ego of Doctor Bruce Banner! Drawn in the art style of Jack Kirby.Related content
Comments: 11
Yeah I really like doing the Kirby Crackle when trying to draw in his art style, it looks cool in my opinion.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Any artworks are immediately made more exciting with the aid of speedlines and Kirby Krackles.
This is particularly appropriate because The Hulk was indeed a Kirby creation alongside many others that are usually credited under Marvel or Stan Lee.
The last Avengers movie was a step in the right direction when they finally given the king of comics his rightful credit/dues as co-creator of the said properties.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yeah, the problem is that Stan was basically the smooth talking showman who could get people to buy the comics.
So he is the man that most people associate with the creation of their beloved heroes and they don't realize it is not just Stan Lee who created them but Stan and Jack and Steve and many others.
I correct people when ever they say Spider-Man was a Stan Lee creation when in reality it was Lee and Ditko.
I was also happy then I saw Kirby's name on the screen, hopefully we will see Ditko's name on the Spider-Man reboot during the end credits.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
He is Mr. Funky Flashman after all.
I'm also pleased to know that his estate is finally being paid for his countless contributions. So these are indeed exciting times to be a comic book fan.
And of course, I hope so too!
Spider-man had always been associated with Ditko in my point of view.
In fact, I could not even remember associating any title with Stan Lee. Sure his name does appear next to the title but I've always seen this as a "formality" thing Marvel throws in there for most especially when there are countless other names credited as the writer of a particular series.
Co-creations are usually a weird angle in the comic book industries. The same could be said about the whole Finger-Kane thing. And seriously, would it kill them to credit the other guy every once in a while? This had me wondering if Siegel and Shuster ever had the same problems with Superman.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Fair points, but from what I remember reading about Siegel and Shuster were basically fired from working on Superman by DC and they did not have their names anywhere on the book for a number of years. They were simply given a couple hundred dollars for their contribution to American culture and basically told to get lost.
It wasn't until 1978 during the upcoming release of Richard Donner's Superman movie that DC Comics was pressured to put Siegel and Shusters names back on the book and give them a lifetime pension for their losses.
Even though DC did make amends that was still pretty $#@!-ed up what they did, so Siegel and Shuster got screwed over in a different way all together... :/
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
It sucks that people tend to associate a character with the company itself. In most of my works I tend to acknowledge/include the names of the creator on my tags. How that fares out, I dunno! But at least I tried to give them their much deserved dues and recognition rather than letting the company bask in the glory of it all.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I kinda wanna redo him and get the shading right on his face, so I might make another one!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Ok I thought he looked cool
👍: 0 ⏩: 0