HOME | DD
GeneralTate — Typoon Class Submarine
Published: 2011-04-26 02:53:20 +0000 UTC; Views: 1724; Favourites: 35; Downloads: 131
Redirect to original
Description
A Soviet Typhoon Class SubmarineRelated content
Comments: 29
one of these maotherfuckers could set the hole vest coast of the US on fire, and it's the only submarine that could survive a nuclear war,
fucking good engenering by the soviet's,
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yea but they were noisy as hell our attack subs down at the bottom of the pacific could detect ones over on the Atlantic ocean.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Theoretically of course, an SSBN doesn't have to move to do it's job.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
The only submarine worldwide with a on-board swimmingpool and connected sauna...THAT´s the true art of warfare.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
sure is it's their version of an American Super carrier
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Hey, Dallas-Class isn´t that comfortable. I think Super-Carrier means something like longrange-submarine with tactical missiles...
Oh, and the design was a lot nicer....Dallas-Class is a damn boring design....
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
No i mean Aircraft Carriers The typhoon is the Russian equivalent to an Aircraft carrier floating city's they both are
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Oh, a big thought-jump...that i failed. Yes, the russian like it big and impressiv. But unfortunately not so nessesary anymore in a world with silent hydrogen-reaction-drives and superkavitation-torpedoes.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
American technology thank you very much
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
What of the named? I remember about the accident of the "Kursk"...America run around and crie the russian was testing superkavitation-torp´s. Not so much heared the german marine sayed "Äh, don´t worry. We told you already that we tested and use them for over one year. It´s called Barrakuda." And the first(and only) boat with a efficient hydrogen(i´m not sure if this word is correct...)-reaction-drive is the German/Russian-coproduction called U-301. Unfortunaly we sold some to Israel. The U.S. Navy was very pissed on a joint maneuver by not spoting the baot even on closest proximity(they sayed that one of the suportboats has a drive-damage and scanned for hours to spot the U-301, in the same time the boat made photos through the scope...captain must be a funny guy)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
i've heard their not as efficient
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Äh SK-torps or the submarine-drive(sorry, i told the wrong name and did not found the right at the moment)?
The American Navy suspected the "Kursk" to test 600km/h torps, but in the same time the german torp runs at least 1000km/h. No delay anymore, every spotet boat is a hiten boat....funny for a nation not at war or the willing to be in the future.
About the submarine. It´s damn cheap, it´s in the level of 300 million Euro. The electric, drive and sensors are from german hand and a big part of hull design is from russian hands. It´s designed as a longrange hunter with superior sneak-skill. It won´t carry(also by size) any tactical weapons, even the israelian navy think about something.....such peacefull guys....
Greece buyed one but withdraw from the contract buy financial problems.
If america´ navy is fearing russians with sk-torps, it would be barrakuda-typs with 1000km/h. But when they fear something like that, what do they think about the vacuum-bomb(higher penetrating power as an MERV by no radiation, ok and a lesser area-effect)...or the BlackShark-Helikopter with twice the payload than an Apache by much higher maneuverability...and...and...and...
Hey, some day´s ago i meet a guy they want to tell me that the Abrahams MBT is the best tank on earth.....he´s gone real soggy by hearing some facts about.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
It's not the Russians i worry about any more it's the old Red Dragon or China
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Ha, the Dragon isn´t red anymore...and that shut be a bigger reason for America to get more silent in worldpolitics. Russia is playing the game LIKE the western states, so not an great enemy. But China find a way to cheat our own rules, and we must mile and agree or loose all our regulations. Byebye WTO....
But what is with the torbs/drives? Yes they all working great, but why you sayed that this where american inventiones? That interestes me because i hear often from americans that they invented things they definitley did not. And not only the military-stuff, but about this USA is really bigmouthy. Again - no offense.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Well it just happens alot of the tech we make goes into that stuff along with Israel and Germany we make the world go round with technology
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Israel, from the Uzi on to all the great bomb/missile-systems, are using german technology. It´s an agrement after the WW2. Until today we still pay 1/3 of every cost of a sold weapon-system to Israel by our peoples tax. Israel just used our tech and copyed and worked from this point on.
America researched on many new things. But the only systems come around was unable to fight an eye-level enemy. For example, our drones are cute and effectiv but we have already mobile EMP-Systems the drones will not survive before spoting. I can talk so on, but no reasearched system are for the future, but it´s great to kill peasantrys with Ak´s.
Tell me of one single standart-weapon or vehicle (land/water or whatever) that is without great deficites.
It´s not about you, but i´m a little angry when politicans or armys like USA´s risking such a big mouth. Sometimes i see american docu-tv and wished i had a red pencil.
Tell me if i´m wrong.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
What i mean to say is no matter the country Nato kicks ass do you not agree there
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Hey, i sayed my english sucks
NATO is blocked by it´s members. In the first it was the plan and workes(America/Russia), but today NATO means big players say little countrys what they will do or not, for examples fight ther war´s for them. NATO did some cool actions against countrys without anything wanted for anyone, exept destabilisation. Like Serbia or Kroatia. But help is anything else. Do you know that israelian artillery-tanks fires to a small village from hill to hill awwhole day. Ok, killing inocent victims by calling the "everything is able - terror"-word is a old story. But beside the village ther was a U.N.-bunker. The bunker was hitten to and they tried to reach the attackers by funk. The officer reached told that he is not responsible for that and will talk to his chief. On the day´s end two U.N.-observers died by israelian fire. Nobody was interested in, so what means worldpolice?
The new chief of the NATO is PROUD that it´s sayed that he was "without meaningful political statements". Mr. Teflon.....that´s not cool.
Russia killed 20.000 victims by "saving" his people from an autonomy-wanting county. Nobody talks about. Because Russia is a big player of the NATO. Modern Mafia, nothing else.
And about tech. Bush wanted to force germany to the desert storm 2. Because we are in the NATO(what never cheked america´s proves to fight this war). Our last chancellor Schröder sayed, ok you want us also responsible for your war? Ok, i have to give you soldiers, but nobody sayed hat kind of. I give you infantry. But america never fought in the last years without FX-airplanes(the ones with the big plate on ther top) and ther tactical info´s. Unfortunately the only experts to use this tech was german´s. And Schröder let Bush deside what kind of personal he want. Would we walk side by side with american-invasion-troops(this way the great terror-support from whole arabia has started) Germany would get terror same than America, and they´ll not the only bad guy´s around anymore. But Bush failes to draw us to ther swamp of illegal warfare. Bit don´t worry, our new chancellor is a stupid puppet and will obey everyone, Bush, Obama or anyone else.
But NATO is no point of stability, it´s the same then the WTO today. Creepy world hah?
What is with the invention-theme? I´m damn interested.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
thanks for the fave and i knew you would like it
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
XD Oh you know me Soviet and anything nautical
👍: 0 ⏩: 0