HOME | DD
#blackandwhite #bw #matrix #ordered #pixelmatrix #pixels #appliedgeometry
Published: 2017-09-27 19:50:33 +0000 UTC; Views: 1024; Favourites: 25; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
This file has exactly Two million four hundred fifty seven thousand six hundred pixels bearing different values between 0 to 255, representing exactly 256 levels of lightness/darkness. Each pixel has its fixed value and position in the matrix and their position to each other form a pattern that is suitable to remind you something that does not exist neither here in my country, nor on the internet. While you see this you actually see fotons emitted by a suitable electronic device, controlled by particles with different electric potential. If you would pour water to any of the devices involved during presenting this file that would ruin the presentation and most possibly something expensive computer equipment, too. And yet you may experience this matrix of pixels as a image depicting the Ligurian Sea near Livorno, captured by a camera that grabbed the light reflected from the waves and passed through a B+W 8 point Star filter, charging a CMOS sensor and using a special microporcessor designed directly for this purpose to load the ligth quantity data in its ordered sequence into a file.But this is just a way of perception, and not the actual thing. What you actually see is an electronic presentation of almost two and half million solid and discrete elements storing different charge levels. You may call this art.
If you want to see it differently, you can order a print for some points and DeviantART will provide you a suitable substance with the same pattern of dots on it, representing the charge of each elements. This is achieved by printing ink to the substance (and making it durable in the appropriate way) and you will have a paper, canvas or other material of your choice with inks all over on it. If you hang it on your wall or place on a desk, or put in a cabinet, your friends may see it and call it an image. If they like it they may even tell you that you have a brilliant taste for arts, and you're fortunate to have your suitable substance spoiled all over with ink. And this is a really fine piece for more pleasant conversation. Not to mention that printed version will lack my beautiful and neatly designed signature logo.
This is my work so please don't claim this yours. This file is copyrighted. You may ask me if you have any idea and I may grant you the right to do what you want to do, but if you don't have my written consent, anything you do with it (except watching and reading carefully) is illegal. Don't risk it because it is not a kind thing to do.
is another shot from there.
Related content
Comments: 7
UnderTheBondi [2017-10-23 20:50:50 +0000 UTC]
Yup. Description is awesome. So are the 2.457.600 electronic devices representing values from 0 to 255.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
HoremWeb In reply to UnderTheBondi [2017-10-23 21:15:26 +0000 UTC]
I wrote a single device but if we are speaking about the elemental photo-emitting devices of an image reproducing machine and you watch it full site at 24MPx , then yes. We also may consider that there are 9,3511877771418467173620031958967e+1635 possible variations but the intentionally fixed values of the discrete pixels limit their actual numbers. They are still way more than the original 2,457,600 because the actual settings of imaging devices would never give you the expected values. On a duely calibrated system the deviation of each elemental data will be within an approx. 2% margin (depending on the calibration methods and the device stability, etc) and a "normal" household system will give you about 20% reliability. It is a rough estimation as I unfortunately cannot count with exact data regarding to outdated screens, video cards, cables, environment lighting, etc. not to mention personal preferences in setups. This is still 1,628149565984462868932402997408e+396 possible variations if I am right and did not screw up everything
Maths is pure mathematics, but human factors are great sources of mistakes stealing fun into the equotations
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
UnderTheBondi In reply to HoremWeb [2017-10-23 22:29:43 +0000 UTC]
Hahaha... Yes... I know all of this (not the maths, I'm not a designer nor an engineer, so I don't care that much about them in this instance). But I like it when people remember that all of it is a way of processing things that are not necessarily there. Either the sensor, the film, the lens or the brain itself. So I liked the description a lot.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
hclausen [2017-09-28 20:31:28 +0000 UTC]
I liked the photo, but I really liked your comment and description. Thanks for sharing.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
HoremWeb In reply to hclausen [2017-09-30 23:55:10 +0000 UTC]
Thank you dear Herb, I am glad that you took it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0






















