HOME | DD

Jack070 — Forty Three

Published: 2010-02-21 18:09:35 +0000 UTC; Views: 716; Favourites: 15; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description Postprocessing by

Thank you
Related content
Comments: 16

Batsceba [2010-06-29 21:34:49 +0000 UTC]

wunderbar

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Jack070 In reply to Batsceba [2010-06-29 21:41:04 +0000 UTC]

Danke!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

absinthFenix [2010-02-25 07:41:53 +0000 UTC]

Great collab you guys!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Jack070 In reply to absinthFenix [2010-02-25 16:34:35 +0000 UTC]

Stam indeed has some postprocessing tricks that beat my workflow, that's why he is awesome

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

StamatisGR [2010-02-22 13:10:17 +0000 UTC]

As I told you I did spend a lot of time on this picture.
I wish it was one of mine.
One thing that puzzles me is that though your settings are good, the picture looked like blurred.
Did you take it while on the move?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Jack070 In reply to StamatisGR [2010-02-22 13:15:12 +0000 UTC]

1/160 3.5 iso800

The time isn't really long, but it was probably taken when walking. Also, I had to be quick as the street is quite crowdy. So yeah, it is a little bit blurry.

Thank you Stam, I have to say that my version wasn't that good

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

StamatisGR In reply to Jack070 [2010-02-22 13:18:52 +0000 UTC]

You were lucky that no one got in the middle so your composition was spot on!
I had the impression that no one else was walking on that pavement.
You're very welcome

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Jack070 In reply to StamatisGR [2010-02-22 13:22:09 +0000 UTC]

I know I was, that's why it had to be taken quickly.
Still, I'm a bit surprised I couldn't hold 1/160 at 20mm, it's like... fail of my hands

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

StamatisGR In reply to Jack070 [2010-02-22 13:26:53 +0000 UTC]

that's why I was puzzled...
it wasn't 1/15 or 1/8

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Jack070 In reply to StamatisGR [2010-02-22 13:54:05 +0000 UTC]

I was walking and taking it so yeah, probably had to take it down too fast. My bad.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

anoxado [2010-02-21 19:27:27 +0000 UTC]

Dobra fotografia. Bardzo realistyczna. Mz. cięzki temat. Nie wiem czemu zdecydowałeś się na kolor...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Jack070 In reply to anoxado [2010-02-21 20:55:27 +0000 UTC]

Z powodu stricte technicznego: czarno-białe byłoby po prostu płaskie. A poza tym ciepły kolor we wnętrzu uwypukla kontrast z zimnym na zewnątrz.
I jeszcze jedno: kolor, mimo tradycji itd, przekazuje troszkę inne informacje. W czerni i bieli koncentrujemy się na kompozycji, formie, kontraście, liniach itd., natomiast kolor pozwala na bardziej bezpośrednie, "życiowe" spojrzenie. Na co dzień widzimy w kolorze, więc w jakiś sposób przybliża to, co pokazuje zdjęcie.
Ale to oczywiście tylko moje odczucie, po prostu po porównaniu wersji kolorowej i czarno-białej wybrałem tą pierwszą.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

anoxado In reply to Jack070 [2010-02-21 22:04:03 +0000 UTC]

Słusznie. Wiedzę masz dobra.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Jack070 In reply to anoxado [2010-02-21 22:36:19 +0000 UTC]

Nice gorzej z praktyką i doświadczeniem, ale nad tym pracuję

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Disco-Science [2010-02-21 18:25:09 +0000 UTC]

oh hey, this has color! still playing with the Helios?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Jack070 In reply to Disco-Science [2010-02-21 18:57:54 +0000 UTC]

It has color indeed, well spotted!

This one was taken with my sigma 17-70, but helios always has place in my bag (or backpack, most often lately)

👍: 0 ⏩: 0