HOME | DD

jimmy-tm — Slick journal CSS

Published: 2008-04-03 10:31:41 +0000 UTC; Views: 3357; Favourites: 19; Downloads: 127
Redirect to original
Description Yay new CSS
Went for a very miniamalistic look

anyway if you have any problems feel free to PM me
Related content

jimmy-tm - Make an Emote

jimmy-tm - :fart:

jimmy-tm - :dead:

jimmy-tm - :hugdoll:

jimmy-tm - :bath:

jimmy-tm - :fangirl:

jimmy-tm - The Fruits of Summer

jimmy-tm - The First dA v6 Journal CSS

jimmy-tm - Splurging

[ TEXT ]


PrRailgun - Texture

nosuper - Tech Tip

Iviwrites - ...this...

CherrysDesigns - Outfit Commissions

GinkgoWerkstatt - Code Basics: Absolute Mood

apocathary - Widen literature [DD]

astrlstmps - [non core custombox] sad and tired

BoffinBrain - WMP11 Journal Skin

DesertSkald - Stars Journal

Kataang-furuba - + Free Use CSS +

VeraCotuna - Simple and Elegant Journal CSS

IncreasinglyCoherent - Black and Pink Journal Skin [DD]

moonfreak - Spiral Notebook Journal Skin
Comments: 26

Joss54 [2009-04-12 19:57:19 +0000 UTC]

very useful ! thanks !

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

rileycvanderzee [2009-03-11 01:09:27 +0000 UTC]

Using this!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Fibbsy [2008-10-07 21:15:54 +0000 UTC]

This is so handy

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

jimmy-tm In reply to Fibbsy [2008-10-10 11:01:41 +0000 UTC]

Thanks.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Fibbsy In reply to jimmy-tm [2008-10-10 18:11:10 +0000 UTC]

No problem

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

philosophyoftime [2008-06-03 08:41:45 +0000 UTC]

i would absolutely love to use this, however, the box isn't fluid, so adapting for smaller widths isn't happening. is there any way to modify it so it will adjust for all screen res's?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

jimmy-tm In reply to philosophyoftime [2008-06-03 10:47:44 +0000 UTC]

yes there is add me on MSN and I'll talk you through it

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

kintsy In reply to jimmy-tm [2008-12-16 00:00:59 +0000 UTC]

I would also love to know how to make the box adjust. Could you tell me how, if possible? Thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

jimmy-tm In reply to kintsy [2008-12-18 06:13:12 +0000 UTC]

I don't quite get what your asking,
please elaborate.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

kintsy In reply to jimmy-tm [2008-12-18 20:50:32 +0000 UTC]

Sorry, I was replying to a conversation you had with someone else about the same thing, I guess I should have been more specific, since you probably can't see the older conversation. The box is a fixed width, that's all - I was just wondering if there's a way to make it so it auto-adjusts in width to the size of your browser window. Thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

jimmy-tm In reply to kintsy [2008-12-21 02:07:22 +0000 UTC]

Sure, you can use percentage values in CSS
But it might mess around with the layout.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

kintsy In reply to jimmy-tm [2008-12-21 17:23:29 +0000 UTC]

Oh okay, I'm not sure how to do that so I won't bother I'll be using it eventually, though. Thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

snowunmasked [2008-04-04 02:59:36 +0000 UTC]

That's actually not bad at all

I am going for a clear background though for when I do use CSS (finally).

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

jimmy-tm In reply to snowunmasked [2008-04-04 03:37:27 +0000 UTC]

I can make you one if you want

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

snowunmasked In reply to jimmy-tm [2008-04-05 00:10:57 +0000 UTC]

Nah it's cool, `parliamentFunk already gave me on

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

jimmy-tm In reply to snowunmasked [2008-04-05 00:31:39 +0000 UTC]

Awesome

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Electromechanical [2008-04-03 13:48:52 +0000 UTC]

You succeeded in your goal of minimalistic mind perception! Unless of course I was but a beggar, then I'd think this quite a lot and consider myself lucky to be able to even see it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

jimmy-tm In reply to Electromechanical [2008-04-03 23:46:28 +0000 UTC]

You lost be about "...rception!" There

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Electromechanical In reply to jimmy-tm [2008-04-03 23:58:43 +0000 UTC]

Wow, what? Your reply makes little sense to Me, Myself and even I!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

jimmy-tm In reply to Electromechanical [2008-04-04 00:46:35 +0000 UTC]

Your first comment made little sense to me

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Electromechanical In reply to jimmy-tm [2008-04-04 00:50:36 +0000 UTC]

You lad, need to read more books and/or play less video games then.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

jimmy-tm In reply to Electromechanical [2008-04-04 00:52:27 +0000 UTC]

Probably but I can really be bothered

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Electromechanical In reply to jimmy-tm [2008-04-04 00:54:32 +0000 UTC]

Welcome to the twenty-first century. Books are regarded utterly boring by youth and TV rains supreme.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

jimmy-tm In reply to Electromechanical [2008-04-04 01:12:48 +0000 UTC]

I love the time we live in

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Sacryer [2008-04-03 12:47:17 +0000 UTC]

I think I shall use this.
Ta for it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

jimmy-tm In reply to Sacryer [2008-04-03 23:46:00 +0000 UTC]

It's ok

👍: 0 ⏩: 0