HOME | DD

JonMann β€” No title needed [NSFW]

Published: 2013-10-09 03:39:56 +0000 UTC; Views: 47491; Favourites: 1298; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description www.modelmayhem.com/3068820
Related content
Comments: 79

roddisc9 [2024-12-21 22:55:43 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

vinsentblack [2024-05-14 15:10:30 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

silentuser0205 [2024-01-22 18:55:13 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 0

heavymetal1234 [2023-12-08 03:26:21 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 0

warjinzo [2023-08-26 14:25:03 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

kunst1963 [2023-02-23 09:31:01 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

KV86 [2023-01-17 00:01:13 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 0

RichinArt [2023-01-12 17:28:50 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

mionaderu [2019-08-15 04:45:35 +0000 UTC]

Awesome!

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 0

fredmarin [2019-03-01 09:38:40 +0000 UTC]

nice exhaust pipe entry

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Coolc70 [2019-01-11 03:10:28 +0000 UTC]

Mmmmmm

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

6wicked66 [2017-10-23 17:35:03 +0000 UTC]

I bet you taste so damn good when you cum

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

coetsee [2017-09-02 19:07:18 +0000 UTC]

Delicious, yum yum.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

samtriller [2016-05-17 16:44:15 +0000 UTC]

very sexy

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

NomisTT [2015-06-25 00:39:51 +0000 UTC]

Farting or not, this is hot!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Seeker1969 [2015-05-29 15:38:40 +0000 UTC]

Lovely!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ySMArtS [2015-03-21 09:34:08 +0000 UTC]

Β  Β Β  Β  Β Β Β Β Β  Β  Β Β Β Β  Β Β Β  Β  Β  Β  Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

1truedread [2015-02-03 11:17:04 +0000 UTC]

Such controversy over the human body. Β I would be laughable if it wasn't so sad.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

MichaelCPhotography [2014-09-19 20:15:38 +0000 UTC]

Such a pretty pussy and rosebud... nice shot!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Apollonia18 [2014-09-10 14:43:32 +0000 UTC]

very sexy

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

scottysteel [2014-06-02 12:00:27 +0000 UTC]

Which model is this?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Dima-Y [2014-03-11 21:30:10 +0000 UTC]

just awesome

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

dcwttaoo1 [2014-01-18 07:39:31 +0000 UTC]

WOW. Β I am JEALOUS!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

JDL1976 [2013-12-21 03:12:06 +0000 UTC]

Perfection!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

gianni911 [2013-12-14 23:45:35 +0000 UTC]

10

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

qd30quiet [2013-12-13 19:18:24 +0000 UTC]

Whoa. Delicious

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

mega579 [2013-11-02 03:03:31 +0000 UTC]

Lunch

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

geekcount [2013-11-01 16:32:26 +0000 UTC]

Good tone and good DOF!


...and is very good polished! ))

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Tataviera [2013-10-11 15:45:46 +0000 UTC]

Perfection found

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ed-brazil123 [2013-10-11 14:41:26 +0000 UTC]

very nice photo, it looks like i can feel the texture of the skin

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Romentrik [2013-10-10 14:55:56 +0000 UTC]

This picture is just a perfect way of displaying a different sort of ART, I love it!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

chasz [2013-10-10 14:48:52 +0000 UTC]

Lol funny...........

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

extraspecialimages [2013-10-10 13:11:39 +0000 UTC]

I am offended! This is just wrong and must be taken down! I can't believe you shot this image at 1/80 second.Β  1/80 second makes me feel wrong on the inside.Β  And even thought I should keep my negative comments to myself, I have to flame things up. I have kids and this site should really have some sort of filter so that when there is a picture taken at 1/80 second it will not just pop up for them to see.Β  I'm "this close" to dropping from this site. How can you call this art when you are using 1/80 second? Maybe it might be different if you were using 1/125th or, dare I say 1/60, but you had to go with 1/80. This type of shutter speed is so unnecessary.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

PandaJeter In reply to extraspecialimages [2013-10-11 00:40:51 +0000 UTC]

Ha this guy cracks me up

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

extraspecialimages In reply to extraspecialimages [2013-10-10 13:12:30 +0000 UTC]

To better make my point, I will reply to my own comment. 1/80 secΒ  = REPORTED!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

geekcount In reply to extraspecialimages [2013-10-15 11:47:48 +0000 UTC]

What do you think about f3.2? I think 1/80 isn't so terrible like f3.2 could be!!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Flaming-Ink-Imaging [2013-10-10 12:46:54 +0000 UTC]

Damn that camera! A Canon would nevvverrr make an image like that...Β 

Β 

So it seems the art illiterates have gathered here to display their ignorance and intolerance for all the world to see. I'm thinking they must somehow be related to the buffoons running the show in Washington, D.C. these days. At least as far as using propaganda and unsupported personal opinions as scare tactics intended to deny others the right to pursue their personal opinions and safe voyage through life. The good news is they all are inconsequential to the flow of reality and will be mostly ignored by the reasonable thinkers of this time.

Β 

So why is this image worthy of being called art? For me it is because it evokes creative thought in all but the tiniest closed minds. For example, I see a noseless face with puckered lipsΒ whistling. I see a bodyscape with beautiful textures and tones. And yes, I see an anatomically perfect female reproductive organ withΒ ideal proportion and shape. What I don't see is body fluid or penetration or anything even remotely similar or related to sexual activity as typically associated with the label "porn".

Β 

I haven't shot with this lovely lady yet but you know that is just a matter of time. Thanks for the preview!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

rumpelstilzchen [2013-10-10 06:59:16 +0000 UTC]

I LOVE the reactions shots like this invoke. In my opinion, good art should encourage conversation and have a lasting impact, and you captured just that. I agree with thesimmsonian completely, good job stirring the pot.

And as far as "kids see these photos..."; maybe as a parent, you should turn on your mature content filter. Just saying...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

sumarlegur [2013-10-10 00:53:46 +0000 UTC]

Such an unnecessary shot.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

thesimmsonian In reply to sumarlegur [2013-10-10 05:02:25 +0000 UTC]

Why? Because it's a shot of someone's ass and pussy? Would it become a "necessary" shot if the photographer used the same lighting, exposure, depth, and angle, and shot a photo of a bowl of fruit instead?
No. . . . no, it wouldn't. This is a site meant for art. Grow up and admire everything that is artistic about this shot; the subject matter is but a piece of the greater photo.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

sumarlegur In reply to thesimmsonian [2013-10-10 14:26:24 +0000 UTC]

Just no.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Feetziesz [2013-10-09 23:20:16 +0000 UTC]

Delicious

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

LivingIsTheDream [2013-10-09 20:37:38 +0000 UTC]

Awesome shot.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

NetSeawolf [2013-10-09 16:33:29 +0000 UTC]

great one really great one !!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

11166164 [2013-10-09 14:02:24 +0000 UTC]

que bonita vagina me gusto

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

mcgxiv [2013-10-09 12:33:59 +0000 UTC]

Eenie meenie minie moe....

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Vampire-Embrace [2013-10-09 11:09:37 +0000 UTC]

The first and second guy commenting don't know what they're saying! Nice picture.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

morovv [2013-10-09 10:24:37 +0000 UTC]

Why the fuck photos of vaginas are on dA. It's not art. It's just a photo of vagina.Β 

And people who fav that are just sexually frustrated.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

mmierek In reply to morovv [2013-10-09 12:25:10 +0000 UTC]

those that aren't nature enough to handle it are the ones who complain.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

oukume In reply to mmierek [2013-10-09 22:51:29 +0000 UTC]

Well, I'm being mature. The human body and nudity by all means does not bother me, nobody is sitting here and saying "ewww a vagina! OMG look at eet, ur so gross!"


I'm asking because I'm not understanding. I want people to answer back, it's not like I am offended by other people's words.

there are kids who come on here, and I just don't think it's very appropriate for them to see either. :I

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2


| Next =>