HOME | DD
LadyOfCode — Oman '08
by-nc-nd
Published: 2008-02-05 17:23:22 +0000 UTC; Views: 641; Favourites: 3; Downloads: 7
Redirect to original
Description
I bet this won't be the last you hear of this trip...International Award for Young People or something.
Previously known as the Duke of Edinburgh Award.
Part of it is going on a camp to some random place. They ditch you with a map and compass in the middle of nowherer and you meet the teachers at checkpoints. This particular one was for about 5 days. And you carry a full backpack packed for the trip too.
Took these pics with a crappy free Kodak camera we got free with something. Pretty good for that kind of camera, if I say so myself.
Had to edit out my face because my face will not appear online in its entirety. >.< Sorry..
P.S. Please excuse my business in the top right hand corner >.< It really has little right to be here
Related content
Comments: 25
this is very good, given that they're taken with a crappy free camera
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
lol thanks
Most of the time lighting was good, but for some I edited the contrast and exposures with PS. They could have been way better with my other camera though
And I would have taken WAY more...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
you have a point their, especially the "WAY more" part ...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
And of a wider variety of subjects too.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
the amount of shots which one can take is directly proportional to the number of subjects the same person can take shots about
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
The amount of shots one can take is directly proportional to the type of camera being used to take those shots; the type of camera(s) in use is directly proportional to the subjects considered for taking shots of; therefore, and only then, is the amount of shots directly proportional to the number of subjects the same person can take shots about, the exception being the photographer themself. The variable lies here, within the photographer concerned, for the range of personalities and even attitudes affect both the type of camera and the subjects considered as well as the amount of shots taken.
You have to EXPLAIN yourself, dude!
XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
'it's a common misconception that the amount of photos you can take is directly proportional to the variety of subjects'
'it's been proven that it's directly proportional to the amount of pictures that we can take on each subject, since it's always possible to take on shot for each subject.'
So you're assuming that it is an incorrect assumption to say that the the amount of photos taken is directly proportional to the variety of subjects, but it has been '
Dude, that is saying the same thing.You just said that the amount of photos taken per subject is directly proportional to the number of photos that we can take of each subject; this is technically, 100% but there there hardly any point in stating that fact becasuse it is an easily understandable concept. We are trying to state what is not completely obvious to the perceptive mind; or to those lacking, whichever or whatever the case may be.
And restating the 'fact' the variables I was talking about is also rather a waste due to the irrelavancy it seems to have with your theory; I mean, mentioning it helps to make sense of what I have written and cause more confusion over your own response.
So seeing as you seem seem to agree with me me on the fact that there are indeed many variables that affect the concerned Person's choice and range of subjects, we agree that this certainly causes changes. You should review statement of the theory concerned here; I stated it as an exception, meaning, that the amount of shots takens is directly proportional to the vairety of subjects only pertaining to that photographer concerned. Perhaps I should have made that clearer?
P.S.
1. A subject is hardly considered a subject if it is not photographed or used in anyway. It becomes Nothing, therefore affecting:
2. It is possible to many shots per subject; i.e. more than one.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Ok let me put my ideas in order.
The subjects on which a person takes his/her shots on, is related to that person's desires to what he/she wants to remember or show people about a certain idea. That limits the subjects which a person can instinctively choose from, because although there are many subjects to choose from that exact person chooses only ones in a certain range. So theoretically he/she can choose any subject, but in reality that's not the case. So if a person has a specific range of subjects that he tends to take shots of that will limit the effect of the amount of shots that can be taken vs. the subjects these shots will be taken on, they'll still be directly proportional though, but it varies from a person to the other because the subjects a certain person can take shots on is sometimes directly proportional to the square of the amount of shots he or she can take.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Now you're just rambling on without a substantial argument in response >.<
Bringing in squares adds some superficiality here... The whole point is to understand exactly what's going on. Or do you not? XD
Anyway, what you said here is basically what I said in the first place:
'...being the photographer themself. The variable lies here, within the photographer concerned, for the range of personalities and even attitudes affect both the type of camera and the subjects considered as well as the amount of shots taken.'
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
i just wanted to say i agree with you in a long way
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Suuuuuure...I think you lost track...
WELL, thanks for the brain-stimulating conversation at any rate
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
You really did lose track, didn't you...
>.<
I know
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
yes i did, i reached a point where i didn't know what i was arguing
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Oh, awesome, I WIN. >.<
MUAHAHAHAAAA...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
there are many variables that contribute to ones choice of subject and eventually the variety of subjects that same person chooses, these include the way someone thinks, the ability of the camera to capture what we want it to, but it's a common misconception that the amount of photos you can take is directly proportional to the variety of subjects, it's been proven that it's directly proportional to the amount of pictures that we can take on each subject, since it's always possible to take on shot for each subject.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
(Click on '
I'm going to save it and like, print it out when we're done arguing/discussing/diagreeing... God knows how long that may take
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
beautiful shots @.@
and the chalk-signed random stones will be a legend one day.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Aww, thanks!
Oh YEAH, I forgot I left them there >.<
Never realised I left my lasting mark on Oman... Unless of course, it rains, floods or another cyclone hits the place...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
True.
Unless I die, and the people with me die, and dA crashes forever, my computer gets erased, my camera destroyed...
Oh, and everyone who saw that rock dies too XD
Always looking on the bright side, am I not..
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
THAT MEANS WE HAVE A MISSION FROM NOW ON
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Oh no!
What, WHAT MISSON!?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0