HOME | DD

lostinbeta In reply to thewanderer [2003-09-02 15:48:59 +0000 UTC]

Alright, I upped the FPS rate to 24 instead of 12 and I edited the description to include a download .fla link. Now off to my other deviations to do the same.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

lostinbeta In reply to pur9e [2003-09-01 04:21:22 +0000 UTC]

See my AS? Sure... if I could find the source file Hehe, I have no clue what happened to it, but I know it's on my comp somewhere so I will look.

And yes, it is running at 12 fps, but of course it is running smoothly because all it is moving is solid block of color, depending on what you decide to pull off with the sections you may need to adjust the fps rate.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

pur9e In reply to lostinbeta [2003-09-01 07:39:13 +0000 UTC]

Actually the reason I asked if it was running at 12 fps is because it is NOT smooth. There is only so much smoothness that can be achieved at that refresh rate...I dont understand why people publish movies at less than 24 fps (besides for viewing on Macs, but their flash performance is so horrible it's pointless).

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

devidedthrone In reply to pur9e [2003-10-22 03:04:41 +0000 UTC]

my mac's flash performance is better than my PC's.

Looks great Shane, hah now i gotta get my flash experiments up.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

pur9e In reply to devidedthrone [2003-10-23 04:19:51 +0000 UTC]

Must be a very old and/or bogged down x86. I've seen many a 'top-notch' mac choke on relatively simple flash files that run fine on x86 systems.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

lostinbeta In reply to pur9e [2003-09-01 15:44:55 +0000 UTC]

Oh, well I guess that depends on the system then, because it runs pretty smooth on my computer, that is why I left it at 12 fps (I usually use between 24 and 30). Meh, oh well

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

lostinbeta In reply to lostinbeta [2003-09-02 15:48:07 +0000 UTC]

Ok, the .fla link has been added....

👍: 0 ⏩: 0