HOME | DD
#aircraft #fanart #destroyermen
Published: 2017-08-03 22:08:06 +0000 UTC; Views: 3709; Favourites: 36; Downloads: 18
Redirect to original
Description
First off, I have to say every aircraft design I do referring to the Destroyermen saga is derived, at least in part, from an initial drawing by the author, Taylor Anderson. Kudos to an inventive mind. I then bend, fold, spindle & mutilate the drawings to my own depraved ends.
This is a design study done by the Baalkpan Aeronautical Design, Aircraft Specification Section for a proposed P-1D model of the P-1 series fighters. The proposed modifications are:
1. A fully enclosed cockpit to reduce drag & pilot fatigue.
2. A mechanical variable pitch propeller assembly to improve the takeoff & climb performance.
3. An engine driven air pump, providing pressurized air to the pilot for high altitude operations.
4. Partial wheel coverings to reduce drag.
While top speed of the aircraft only increases 5 MPH, due to the added weight & limitations of the airframe, the overall flight performance, range & endurance increase substantially. The takeoff run & time to climb to altitudes are reduced dramatically. The enclosed cockpit provides protection for the pilot, who up to this time was required to essentially fly a high performance combat aircraft in a tornado. The engine driven air pump allows aircraft operation at high altitudes. The benefits of this are increased range, increased radio coverage, the ability to overfly mountains, as opposed to flying around or having to turn back & tactically to obtain an advantage in air to air combat. Overall drag reduction also increases range & endurance.
Related content
Comments: 18
Jimbowyrick1 [2021-12-05 00:23:05 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Hardcorev20 [2021-10-22 00:37:46 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
HMSWyvern366 [2020-07-20 03:19:29 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Loupy59 In reply to HMSWyvern366 [2020-07-27 16:35:30 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
HMSWyvern366 [2020-07-15 05:00:57 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Loupy59 In reply to HMSWyvern366 [2020-07-18 17:12:07 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
HMSWyvern366 [2020-07-15 04:59:36 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
HMSWyvern366 [2020-07-03 00:23:53 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Loupy59 In reply to HMSWyvern366 [2020-07-11 15:47:47 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Snoeplau [2017-08-04 00:30:02 +0000 UTC]
Very nice, and I like the idea of the enclosed cockpit. However, I'd say pressurized cockpits are still not feasible in the D-Men ALT-world. Up until 1942 (the year our heroes departed the human world) the pumps, compressors, the associated plumbing and thick pressure chambers necessary to sustain continued high pressure at altitude were installed only in multi-engine medium to heavy aircraft (Boeing B-29, Ju-86P, etc). Yes, some late-war Spitfires, Bf-109G's and such started to get pressurized mostly for recon but more often than not it would be too heavy and cumbersome for offensive maneuvers so the majority of fighters remained unpressurized.
Pressurized manila clippers? Dicey proposition. A delicate canvas over bamboo plane like the fleashooter definitely wouldn't be able to support such gear. Just providing heavy oxygen masks and tanks will add a heavy weight burden as is.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Loupy59 In reply to Snoeplau [2017-08-04 14:43:26 +0000 UTC]
Sorry, should have been more specific. The pressurized air is going to a face mask like the one I described in the P-2 design studies. It's just a small pump feeding a tank which in turn feeds the mask through a regulator. It's not a big tank nor at high pressure & if the pump fails will give the pilot enough time to get to a lower altitude.
You're right, a pressurized cockpit is a bit too much for them right now, especially in an airframe that wasn't designed for it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Snoeplau In reply to Loupy59 [2017-08-04 16:22:13 +0000 UTC]
I concur, compressor pump > tank > regulator > face mask is quite doable and would add just a few pounds to the aircraft. Lemurian water pumps are already quite sophisticated so they would have no problem creating an air pump.
Hope I'm not putting you off with all my nitpicking!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Loupy59 In reply to Snoeplau [2017-08-04 17:27:38 +0000 UTC]
Hell, I pick nits with the best of them. You always miss something or get something wrong & if folks don't call you on it, you can't fix it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Loupy59 In reply to Pokermind [2017-08-04 14:46:11 +0000 UTC]
Thanks. She looks a bit rough, but add on mods often do that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Pokermind In reply to Loupy59 [2017-08-04 15:42:40 +0000 UTC]
Hmm has a variable pitch prop but still two bladed would not a three blade prop be best for variable pitch props?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Loupy59 In reply to Pokermind [2017-08-04 17:32:17 +0000 UTC]
It depends, on a lower HP engine, two are fine as you go up in HP three or even four are needed to get the full potential from an engine. The current engine probably should have three like you say, BUT with three, I'd have to put a spinner on it, the mechanism would be a biatch to do in MS Paint.
Going with two blades kept it simple, cheap & sleazy.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Pokermind In reply to Loupy59 [2017-08-05 17:55:47 +0000 UTC]
Just something ham fisted sailors and cat decorate any surface machinists would produce
👍: 0 ⏩: 0

























