HOME | DD

AlterEgo46 In reply to BenMajoraDrowned [2022-11-05 06:13:01 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

x19a In reply to tocsinphoto [2014-07-03 03:15:48 +0000 UTC]

+1 that.

👍: 1 ⏩: 1

tocsinphoto In reply to x19a [2014-07-03 03:18:53 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

krynn-inactive In reply to MuneYotsuki [2014-07-02 23:24:38 +0000 UTC]

It's a tribute to Betty Page, an early and highly influential fetish / pinup model who is now deceased.

👍: 1 ⏩: 1

MuneYotsuki In reply to krynn-inactive [2014-07-03 00:19:24 +0000 UTC]

Oh, okay. Thank you.

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

0ccums-Razor In reply to Scythian7 [2014-07-03 00:04:16 +0000 UTC]

Actually, Bettie Page tended to specialize on being the one who was dominated in her pin-ups. (The ones of her being spanked were the most popular.)

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

GnaeusEsclavus In reply to Scythian7 [2014-07-02 21:28:38 +0000 UTC]

Hell yeah, with pleasure

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

MuneYotsuki In reply to Jylwe [2014-07-02 22:11:59 +0000 UTC]

I'm sorry, how are those "whore clothes"? It's a dominatrix outfit. If a woman chooses to dress sexily, be sexually active, or in any way express her sexuality in a way that other people don't approve of, for some reason it ellicits cries of "whore" and "slut". It's no different from a man trying to be sexy or dressing as such. It's this really awful double-standard tied together with conflicting views of what an entire gender is supposed to act like, and I really wish people would stop looking down on women who put aside society's expectations of what the "proper" woman is, and dress and act how they want to.

For the record, however, the outfit alone does not make her pretty. In my opinion, her face has very elegant features and I really like her hair style.

You made a comment down below about how it's just here to satisfy people into this fetish. Okay, so it's a model doing a fetish picture.

So what? Does that make it bad?

(P.S. Not trying to attack you, and the descriptions up above were about people who do those things, not just you. But I do think making disparaging comments about someone, calling them names or associating them with prostitution just because they are confident enough to dress a certain way or express their sexuality, is a disservice not only to them but also to other women who see that negative reaction and think that having confidence in themselves or expressing their sexuality are bad.)

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Jylwe In reply to MuneYotsuki [2014-07-02 22:36:22 +0000 UTC]

well, I think you misunderstood me, what I was trying to understand is what could be pretty in this picture, that's all. I'm not into this fetish, and I can say I don't find her pretty at all, and this just because of the clothes. Now I don't think she express her sexuality, cause sexuality isnt' related to wear particular clothes, since we do it naked.

so to make it clear, I don't say this fetish is bad, but people who aren't into it won't find it sexually attractiv, cause it's not really related to a women expressing her sexuality but the way you take something else, here apparently the clothes as something sexually attractiv, that' sthe definition of a fetish.

I don't say she's a whore, but still, normally the whores wear those clothes, and for purpose, cause they know some men are into this fetish.

So basically I don't want to say anything bad to this, all I want is to understand what is "pretty", and apparently here, the only thing that makes it pretty is the fact she's sexually attractiv (for the people who are into that kind of things) so basically, the beauty is relativ to who will look at it. so I have my answer, and well, we can't really define what's the beauty anyway, and it's not really related to women, cause it's only some chemical reactions that make us being attracted by the more curvy women. and then y, all the fetishes. it's kinda complex.

so for you to understand it, there's nothing bad. but you can say any person who is expressing his sexuality is good, think of all the really bad fetishes, especially the one related to childs. 

here it's not bad since it won't hurt anyone. but those things aren't as easy as you want them to be.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MuneYotsuki In reply to Jylwe [2014-07-03 00:49:46 +0000 UTC]

Sexuality can very much have to do with clothing. That is one of the most frequent elements and methods of expression of sexuality, infact. "Sex" and "sexuality" are NOT the same thing, and I strongly recommend you look into this matter a bit more, since you seem to be confused about the difference. Expressing your sexuality isn't just "something we do naked". You're thinking of having sex.

Yes, this very much IS related to her sexuality.

No, "the whores" do not usually wear "those clothes". Nothing about her or her clothing indicates she accepts money for sex. You said they were "whore clothes". They aren't.

It's fine if you don't like the picture, or don't think she's pretty. But the demeaning language used was unnecessary, and that is what made me speak up. People use "whore" as a phrase for shaming and demeaning women. It's not a compliment, and when it's being blatantly mis-applied to a model just for wearing a fetish outfit, then it's definitely not okay.

Also, I already gave examples of things I thought made her pretty, and they had nothing to do with what she was wearing. So, no, it's not "just her clothes" that make her pretty.

Again: Sexuality is not the same as sex. It has to do with sexual identity, your orientation and preferences, and so on. It encompasses more than just the physical act of sex.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Jylwe In reply to MuneYotsuki [2014-07-03 11:14:18 +0000 UTC]

women are humans like men. and you can't say those clothes are common. they're only used to sexually attract men. the only purpose of those clothes are that. I don't say she's a whore or anything. but she's obviously doing that on purpose, knowing a lot of person will like it, so then she'll be satisfied. 

but again, I respect this, it's normal to want that and apparently a lot of people like it, so it's all fine, for the people and for her.

and you must be right, the model should be pretty, cause otherwise it couldn't work I guess

👍: 0 ⏩: 0