HOME | DD

mickdoesclick — Bibi

Published: 2007-09-14 13:59:00 +0000 UTC; Views: 1267; Favourites: 11; Downloads: 15
Redirect to original
Description Yet another spontaneous portrait! taken a few weeks back at a little mini festval in my city. We went to watch Vive La Fete.

Model: ~Bix2



Note: I give ~VintageVision permission to display this deviation in the club's gallery
Related content
Comments: 24

Zero-Wing [2008-08-19 20:04:09 +0000 UTC]

I love it, it reminds me of World War II France for some reason... The only real complaint I have is that the levels could use some tweaking, and the picture is a bit too blurry. Other than that, great work!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mickdoesclick In reply to Zero-Wing [2008-08-20 19:34:30 +0000 UTC]

Thanks, I indeed wanted to create an old-looking film style thingy.

What would you change with the levels?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Zero-Wing In reply to mickdoesclick [2008-08-20 19:37:48 +0000 UTC]

I'd adjust it a little so the skin is a bit more brighter in order for it to stand out more.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mickdoesclick In reply to Zero-Wing [2008-08-20 19:46:38 +0000 UTC]

I hate myself now for not saving psd's (but only the original files and the final ones all in .jpg ofcourse) -_-'

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Zero-Wing In reply to mickdoesclick [2008-08-22 13:32:59 +0000 UTC]

Well, you could always adjust the levels from the jpeg itself, shouldn't be too bad.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mickdoesclick In reply to Zero-Wing [2008-08-25 07:23:18 +0000 UTC]

Editing a .jpg and saving it again as a .jpg gives you a lot of visible compression

Maybe I will play some more with it in the future

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Magenta-Fantasies [2008-08-19 19:58:08 +0000 UTC]

I'm not particularly good at critiquing photos, but I'm in it for the critique.

Even though the photo is good quality, the woman's face seems sort of out of focus and a bit blurry around the edges of her face and hair, though this isn't noticable in full view.
I'm not one for black-and-white photography, but this is a great picture overall.

By the way, as someone who's experienced in non-color photography, what is the exact difference between black-and-white and grayscale? Or are they synonyms?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mickdoesclick In reply to Magenta-Fantasies [2008-08-20 19:36:48 +0000 UTC]

Think the blurryness has to do with me adding some vignetting ^^

greyscale is a photoshop term for when you remove the colors from a photo to obtain a black-white version.

Real black-white photography as shot on a film roll show more contrast, the difference between white <> black is much bigger.
A greyscale photo has more shades of grey between the two colors.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

whispering-hills [2008-03-12 02:37:04 +0000 UTC]

Really nice vintage feel - just like you were going for! I love the framing and simple composition here.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mickdoesclick In reply to whispering-hills [2008-03-12 09:32:12 +0000 UTC]

sweet! Thanks for the comment

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

mitsukononame [2007-10-01 03:38:02 +0000 UTC]

Very pretty! Beautiful photo

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mickdoesclick In reply to mitsukononame [2007-10-01 07:00:16 +0000 UTC]

thanks you

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

jadz1lla [2007-09-18 07:48:50 +0000 UTC]

lovely shot (i actually like the grain and the blur.. gives it a cinematic look).. beautiful model..

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mickdoesclick In reply to jadz1lla [2007-09-18 07:50:12 +0000 UTC]

Thats why I like at aswell

Added who the model is

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

simul [2007-09-18 06:54:54 +0000 UTC]

I like the classic look.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mickdoesclick In reply to simul [2007-09-18 07:06:38 +0000 UTC]

thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

pearwood [2007-09-18 01:17:24 +0000 UTC]

Lovely lady with penetrating eyes.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mickdoesclick In reply to pearwood [2007-09-18 07:06:30 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

P0RG [2007-09-15 22:39:47 +0000 UTC]

Well, where to start.

I know you like critique, so here we go.

The photo is both grainy and blurry, something which I cannot understand how you achieved.

The levels are not right, there needs to be more white. How on earth did you shoot this with the 20d? I don't mean to be rude, but did you mean it to turn out like this? It's just that the 20d is such a good camera and this is out of focus and with a fantastic amount of grain.

Your ISO is on 3200!!!

That is very high dude! Why? I always shoot portraits on 80. 100 max.

3200 is insane! Thats were all the grain is coming from. Perhaps you should look up a basic tutorial on portrait photography.

Good luck in the future. : )

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mickdoesclick In reply to P0RG [2007-09-15 23:16:56 +0000 UTC]

you are totally correct. Well you would be if I tried to achieve a technically correct photo. Which I did not.

ISO 3200 is easy, its shot at night outside. What I tried to achieve (and thats how I edited it photoshop) is to look like a very retro photo.
I used some vignetting etc to achieve this.

So again, your critique would be in place if I wanted a stylish and technically perfect portrait (something that anyone can do in my opinion, it can be learned) this however, I did not want to do.

That's why I am in a lot of retro and vintage clubs here on dA. I like non-perfect stuff. Hence, I like to make shots look 'different' (ugly if I may quote some others ). It also shows in the rest of my gallery I think.

But thanks for your comment anyway

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

P0RG In reply to mickdoesclick [2007-09-15 23:41:35 +0000 UTC]

Sorry to go against your themes, but why did you by a professional camera to take vintage photos? Why not a vintage camera?

It just seems a waste on a excellent camera in my opinion.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mickdoesclick In reply to P0RG [2007-09-16 00:30:05 +0000 UTC]

I do not use my 20D jus t for vintage photography, dont worry, haha

I also have my Canonet, pics taken with that are in my gallery aswell, and I ordered a Holga aswell.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

P0RG In reply to mickdoesclick [2007-09-16 01:43:32 +0000 UTC]

Oh. Phew!

That's cool then

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mickdoesclick In reply to P0RG [2007-09-16 09:29:14 +0000 UTC]

haha <3

👍: 0 ⏩: 0