HOME | DD
Published: 2010-02-24 00:38:27 +0000 UTC; Views: 42871; Favourites: 409; Downloads: 756
Redirect to original
Description
model done for "Messerschmitt - 264 - Amerika Bomber" book, from Ian Allan Publishing.Related content
Comments: 37
Treata11 [2024-12-27 17:52:55 +0000 UTC]
π: 0 β©: 0
SPEARHARD [2023-12-09 21:04:31 +0000 UTC]
π: 0 β©: 0
Hikastle [2023-02-14 01:09:14 +0000 UTC]
π: 0 β©: 0
Rurudyne [2021-12-01 03:12:36 +0000 UTC]
π: 0 β©: 0
Arklyte84826 [2017-09-19 10:30:17 +0000 UTC]
Are those "Thin Man"-like gun-type nukes it carries?
π: 0 β©: 1
Oxygino In reply to Arklyte84826 [2018-02-10 18:11:05 +0000 UTC]
Sorry about this late reply! Those are aerial torpedoes.
π: 0 β©: 2
Arklyte84826 In reply to Oxygino [2018-05-08 12:52:52 +0000 UTC]
Does it dive(germans had an infamous fetish for it even if it was pointless on anything above small bombers) for attack or there is some way to control descent and break the speed for torps before they'll hit the water(those torps being some strange hybrid of Fritz X, Hs 293/294 and Long Lance)?
π: 0 β©: 0
Arklyte84826 In reply to Oxygino [2018-02-10 23:21:00 +0000 UTC]
Oh, God, why so big? What are you even hunting? Atlantis?
π: 0 β©: 0
SergeantPanther [2017-07-13 18:03:03 +0000 UTC]
What is this one base on? can't find any other planes on google images that look like this. Really sad.
π: 0 β©: 1
Oxygino In reply to SergeantPanther [2018-02-10 18:16:54 +0000 UTC]
Sorry about this late reply. Here you can find some more info:Β www.luft46.com/prototyp/me264.β¦
π: 0 β©: 1
SergeantPanther In reply to Oxygino [2018-02-11 08:33:49 +0000 UTC]
Thanks man, really nice.
π: 0 β©: 0
Learstang [2017-06-06 02:40:36 +0000 UTC]
Beautiful work! What programmes did you use?
Best Regards,
Learstang
π: 0 β©: 1
BULLETPROOFCHEETAH [2016-09-29 00:48:41 +0000 UTC]
The Axis Fortress, this slams. Β So cool.
π: 0 β©: 0
Burgundy1477 [2016-01-05 23:03:11 +0000 UTC]
Impressive look What are the torpedo-appearing weapons? Just wondering.
π: 0 β©: 1
Oxygino In reply to Burgundy1477 [2016-01-30 20:16:02 +0000 UTC]
Yes, those are aerial torpedoes. You can see more images of this Me-264 on my website:Β www.oxygino.com/site/?p=1039
π: 0 β©: 0
JRBeeler [2015-07-21 00:48:55 +0000 UTC]
This does look like something the Germans would have tried to build in 1944-45. Β Were the German engineers really trying to save the Third Reich, or just trying to add to their resumes in the hopes of getting jobs in the "Cold War", as we now call it?
π: 1 β©: 0
f1nalstand [2015-06-23 21:36:39 +0000 UTC]
This is wonderful! Would you consider doing one on the Fw 238?
π: 0 β©: 0
aero3-5 [2015-05-08 15:19:57 +0000 UTC]
Now that is what I call a high-speed torpedo bomber!
π: 0 β©: 0
MogliLP In reply to kceg [2014-12-29 13:10:09 +0000 UTC]
exactly not, it was Willy Messerschmitt own idea to develop this plane with such wings.
π: 0 β©: 1
wbyrd [2013-12-03 00:17:26 +0000 UTC]
this has al the design features of a Nazi wunderweapon... Advance features for the day, swept wings push pull engines remote turrets....and it still keeps the basic look of a German light bomber of the time pencil shaped fuselage, twin tails. glass nose..great merge of details here,
π: 0 β©: 0
Ruiner3000 [2013-06-29 17:30:41 +0000 UTC]
This would perfectly fit Wolfenstein The New Order!
π: 0 β©: 0
Lindale-FF [2013-04-17 07:23:48 +0000 UTC]
Ah yes. the Amerika Bomber Projekt.
While yes, this HEAVILY MODIFIED Messerschmitt Me 264 might have done well, I think the Arado E.555 and Horten Ho XVIII just might have better succeeded in this role. A flying wing is just more fuel efficient, and (in time) allowed for intercontinental distance on the same amount of fuel. It also allows for internal bomb bays, which adds to the aerodynamics (which further adds fuel efficiency), and would more easily fool the early radar systems of the era.
Unfortunately, flying wings require Fly-By-Wire technology for any sort of stable manoeuvring. That, and many other required engine technologies meant that such large aerocraft with such long range were just too ahead of their time.
π: 0 β©: 1
MogliLP In reply to Lindale-FF [2014-12-29 13:11:22 +0000 UTC]
yup, but the Bf 262 used that technology
π: 0 β©: 0
Airforce1985 [2011-02-09 01:14:45 +0000 UTC]
FUNNY, I THOUGHT THE AMERIKA BOBMER LOOKED FAR BETTER.
π: 0 β©: 1
Lindale-FF In reply to Airforce1985 [2013-04-17 07:23:41 +0000 UTC]
The Amerika Bomber was a project to develop intercontinental bombers, not aerocraft themselves. The Me-264 was simply one of the many designs submitted.
π: 0 β©: 0
Misieq79 [2010-03-27 23:30:32 +0000 UTC]
The Me-264 looked different (though you kept the fuselage). But hell with it, this is an awesome design. One rarely sees push-pull layouts, not to mention the jet-prop compound. Nice.
π: 0 β©: 1
eedwardgrey In reply to Misieq79 [2011-05-24 18:44:56 +0000 UTC]
This is a version that was conceived by Messerschmitt but never left the drawing table. Which is kinda bad since other than the fact that it would have been used by a totallitarian, imperialist regime to terrorize innocent civilians it would have been pretty awesome.
π: 0 β©: 1
Anzac-A1 In reply to eedwardgrey [2014-11-16 21:58:53 +0000 UTC]
Yeah. The version that flew was more conventional; four engines driving four propellers in a tractor configuration.
π: 0 β©: 0
dawestsides [2010-02-25 01:27:50 +0000 UTC]
I'm totally new to 3D,and I'm learning thanks to the folks on mil-mesh...so we're not all topguns!
π: 1 β©: 0
dawestsides [2010-02-24 08:37:00 +0000 UTC]
This is awesome!
Your website is great too.
Please share it on military-meshes.com
π: 1 β©: 1
Oxygino In reply to dawestsides [2010-02-24 16:31:08 +0000 UTC]
thanks for the words and thanks for the inviting. Indeed I was part of military meshes some years ago.
I like to learn with forums, but I don't really like to be a part of them... there are a lot of people that know too much about 3D. I feel unconfortable sometimes. I'm not bad at 3D, but I'm far from good. I prefer to keep myself excluded from the "topguns".
Even so, thanks!
π: 2 β©: 0
























