HOME | DD
Published: 2010-02-18 04:37:47 +0000 UTC; Views: 6861; Favourites: 99; Downloads: 258
Redirect to original
Description
Color work of [link] Fixed some anatomy issues. Took an ass of a long time on it.Comments and crits would be appreciated.
Related content
Comments: 22
Kaya-Marae [2010-11-26 12:27:31 +0000 UTC]
Gawd she looks so badass. I usually don't like things like this but... She's epic.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
pafmaster In reply to Kaya-Marae [2010-11-26 22:16:53 +0000 UTC]
I love my comic books. Can you tell? >.>
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Kaya-Marae In reply to pafmaster [2010-11-27 08:23:48 +0000 UTC]
HAH. Oh no, couldn't have guessed it if my life depended on it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
pafmaster In reply to Kaya-Marae [2010-11-27 21:06:24 +0000 UTC]
yay me and my 100s of comic books
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Levia-the-Dragon [2010-08-26 13:50:10 +0000 UTC]
Ahh yes, another in the long and proud history of rule-63s...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Levia-the-Dragon In reply to pafmaster [2010-08-27 06:55:37 +0000 UTC]
a rule of the internet that states for every character, there must exist a version of inverse gender.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
pafmaster In reply to Levia-the-Dragon [2010-08-27 07:01:50 +0000 UTC]
oOo... but, Darkhorse themselves actually did it first. Probably not first, but they did it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Levia-the-Dragon In reply to pafmaster [2010-08-27 07:02:07 +0000 UTC]
Oh, you mean she's an actual character?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
pafmaster In reply to Levia-the-Dragon [2010-08-27 07:05:24 +0000 UTC]
I think it was part of short story revealing the suit's own sentience but yes.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Levia-the-Dragon In reply to pafmaster [2010-08-27 07:17:16 +0000 UTC]
Huh... so it possessed someone else or showed itself to be fundamentally female or what?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
pafmaster In reply to Levia-the-Dragon [2010-08-27 07:19:11 +0000 UTC]
It was removed from Al Simmons and attached to someone else, don't remember who.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Levia-the-Dragon In reply to pafmaster [2010-08-27 13:12:25 +0000 UTC]
Ohhh, right then... just a legacy costume swap...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Elveanna [2010-08-08 09:43:48 +0000 UTC]
Hi there! I'm here to give you all the feedback this piece got at #Traditional-Artists 's Critique Night!
I hope it is useful and can help you for your future work By *JgMantilla :
"I'm not very good with digital, but I think the drawing is pretty well performed overall. The lighting and shading effects are very well accomplished. Though I'm not very sure about the anatomy/aspect of her face... it looks kind of flat." By ~chessgirl :
"To start, the lighting and shading is very well done, though some of the green light on the girl doesn't look very realistic. The coloring on the spikes is very good. They look very realistic. The red sheet is also really good. That kind of stuff (or so I think) is difficult to draw, but you seem to have mastered it. The eyes looks too small for the face, though that could just be me. Also, the upper leg is too short. The metal and clothing is excellent, though, and the proportions on the arm are perfect. All-in-all, very well done! ^^" By ~Elveanna :
"First of all: That's a very impressing pose! Really gives some movement. Her right lower leg seems to have a weird bow in it, though. I like how the cloak is flowing, it adds to the movement. It could have some more folds and wrinkles, maybe, to give it a more realistic touch, but that's a minor thing. What is more of a problem in my opinion is that it is very dark. At some points you have to take some time to see what belongs to the cloak and what to the figure and what is actually background. The contrast color and the light in the background is a good thing here, but I think you could do it overall lighter. But her face is great, and most of the anatomy looks pretty good - together with all the movement that makes a fine, well-crafted piece! One can see you put a lot of thought and time to it."
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
























