HOME | DD
paramoreSUCKS β True ProLife Definition
Published: 2012-09-12 09:16:30 +0000 UTC; Views: 9012; Favourites: 371; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
Tru fax.---
Will birth be life-threatening to you, the mother?
Oh, well. Have it anyway.
The fetus has a life-threatening birth defect?
Oh, well. Have it anyway.
Rape?
Oh, well. Have it anyway. Besides, pregnancy from "legitimate rape" is rare because the female body can "shut down" the "whole thing" so that fertilization won't occur.
Too young / Unable to care for properly?
Oh, well. Have it anyway and give it up for adoption, even though the orphanages are overflowing and I'm to busy attending this protest to adopt those unwanted kids.
Don't believe your parasitic fetus / human tissue is a gift from god that should be automatically sacred?
Tough shit, you fucking heathen. America is a theocracy, remember. It's murder even though it's not legally defined as such. I'd rather see the Middle East leveled than have one aborted fetus (only for the pro-life warmonger that's common in the US).
---
Also, believe it or not, I'm not a baby-hater. I even plan to pop a few out of my cooch one day.
Related content
Comments: 833
π: 0 β©: 0
No. The true definition is: when a human being, is considered a human being.Β
π: 4 β©: 0
π: 0 β©: 0
No, when human life is precious even when they can't fight back.Β
π: 0 β©: 1
π: 0 β©: 1
π: 0 β©: 1
π: 0 β©: 1
π: 0 β©: 1
π: 0 β©: 0
I like how butthurt commenters are trying to be so illogicaly "logical" 
π: 0 β©: 0
Seriously, the best argument you have is a false cause fallacy? This is downright pathetic.
π: 0 β©: 1
THANK YOU FOR NOTICING THIS I've often found that a huge amount of arguments are actually built on fallacies and illogical thinking
π: 0 β©: 1
What sort of "fallacies" and "illogical thinking?" Care to elaborate a little bit on that?
π: 0 β©: 1
Sure! First things first, this entire argument is based on a false cause fallacy which is a fallacy Where you base your argument on two unconnected points or event s for example, every time I go to sleep the sun goes down therefore the sun goes down because I go to sleep. A false cause is using two unconnected premises to prove an unsupported conclusion. Secondly our culture takes science as the highest authority (since we've refused to believe in God) however science has proved over and over again that a fetus IS A HUMAN BEING therefore by having an abortion we are taking away a HUMANS right to life for the sake of comfort which is blatantly violating the constitution and basic morality. And even if you don't consider a fetus a human being (which is false I have proof if you want it) the simple face that this fetus will become a human being should be enough to preserve that life. If you want to talk about this more please message me I'm always open to discussion!Β
π: 0 β©: 1
As in, the logical fallacies you have made just now regarding fetal development and pregnancy, either not knowing or not caring that the "proof" you have is actually false and therefore not and never will be a reliable source of information (a fetus being a human being a prime example) and this type of information is more manipulative and harmful than beneficial purely for the sake of having complete control over their bodies regardless of what they say, which leads to a whole lot more suffering on the mother and child's part as soon as the child is born than being pregnant unexpectedly and against their will by the public, your kind especially, do nothing to help them throughout their pregnancy and raising their child and call the mother a "monster" or "slut" or state that "she deserved it" and the like while reinforcing double standards all the while stating that what they, you in particular, spew out of their mouth is the "absolute truth," no matter how many times they have been proven false and very desperate to make their opinions into law and totally disregard the personhood of women in favor of the unborn?
Talk about irony. I could also show you proof that the fetus is not a human being, but I'm using my phone right now to type this up due to issues with my computer, but I will send you some once I gain access to my mom's computer. And besides, it's a bit of a hassle to use Google Chrome on mobile since the DeviantART app is no longer compatible with the phone I am using.
P.S. Even if you do send me "proof," it's still going to be false no matter how people look at it (knowing most of your kind, you're pretty deluded), no matter how much you try to prove it, so it's a lost cause on your part. Unless you can send me a link to an actual medical site that does not have any false facts, is neutral on both sides and above all, have lots of medical accuracy in regards to fetal development (the gestational milestones in particular). And no pro-life sites whatsoever, those places usually have medical fallacies in them. Shouldn't be all that hard, right?
π: 0 β©: 1
π: 0 β©: 1
π: 0 β©: 0
I disagre with the stamp.
You're confusing the things, throwing inside the same bag to all people.
A true pro-life (not the hypocritical "SJW/progressist"activists you surely saw on media) must support fetuses, women and children at the same time. This stamp (and its claim) shows a typical logical falacy. You are prone to judge others only by what you see and the unlogical conclusions you get inside your mind, but you don't have the ability to go out from your egoisticalΒ bubble and claim support for your own views while at the same time you don't respect the opinions from others.
Free abortion is just genocide.
The only abortion allowed in a fair world is when extreme cases arise; for example, when mother's life is in serious risk, or rape, etc. Still it has to be done as the last resource available.
π: 0 β©: 1
I know this comment is a year old, but do you even know what genocide is?
π: 3 β©: 0
When you are asleep, Β you are unconscious, but you are still alive.
Killing you would be murder.Β
It is the same with an unborn baby!
π: 0 β©: 1
yea but when i'm asleep i don't need my mom there literally supplying me with life like a parasite
π: 2 β©: 3
Parasites are different species from their hosts, and with parasites the host doesn't have a body part specifically designed to accommodate them.
π: 0 β©: 1
So you're saying cancer is good?
π: 0 β©: 1
Your entire argument here is built off a slippery slope fallacy and/or a false cause. The premise of this (parasites do not resemble babies in any way) does not in ANY WAY imply the conclusion you drew from it ( so are you saying cancer is good)
π: 1 β©: 0
The birth and death ratio of humans is fucking scary.
131,000,000 people are born all over the world in a year for every 55,000,000 people that die all over the world in a year.
We anti-human-life supporters and abortion supporters NEED and MUST do something to fix/flip flop this around NOW if most humans don't want a huge ass extinction, no matter the cause, to happen to us humans between now and the year 2050!!!
π: 0 β©: 0
Ok I will reverse time and kill you as a fetus because at the time you were unimportant, according to your logic that is entirely moral.
π: 0 β©: 1
Fine by me. I hate paying bills
π: 0 β©: 0
THERE'S A PRO 'LIFE' PERSON GOING AROUND DEVIANTART THREATENING TO KILL PEOPLE, THEY HAVE ALREADY THREATENED TO HIRE A HITWOMAN ON ME.
SPREAD THIS JOURNAL LIKE WILDFIRE!
yugo-55.deviantart.com/journalβ¦
π: 0 β©: 0
My view on the matter is abortion should only be allowed if the pregnancy's either a result of rape or dangerous to the mother.
π: 0 β©: 3
The thing is that giving birth to an unwanted child can ruin the woman's life even if the pregnancy is not a result of rape nor is dangerous to her. I don't think ruining your life for someone that you didn't even want is worth it.
π: 3 β©: 0
Nice to see another sane person.
π: 0 β©: 0
Women should have a choice.
π: 1 β©: 2
Women have a choice. Whether to have sex or not. They also have the choice to use protection. Or not.
π: 0 β©: 2
How about instead if thinking like that.
You know 1.people are raped or manipulated mentally into pregnancyΒ
2.This is not a man's issue because he does not carry it around for 9 months and can leave at any moment.Unless in rare cases.
3. Just "not having sex" has been proven time and time again that it is not effective.
4.Birth control is very expensive,and it is not only the job of the woman but the job of the man to use protection.
5.Abortions are thought out and people don't use it as birth control,they use it as a last resort.
6.Sometimes severe defects may not appear until later in a pregnancy,and no woman wants to give birth to a dead baby ot suffering baby.
If you don't like abortion.
Support free birth control and condoms.
Or just don't have one.
Abstinence has been proven time and time again to not be effective at preventing pregnancy.Because no matter what you tell people,sex is natural and is always going to happen.
π: 2 β©: 4
Well said. Of course I think the choice to have sex doesn't necessarily mean consent to pregnancy.Β
π: 2 β©: 0
Weird,I never blocked breloomish,she/he (I don't know pronouns well) blocked me and blocked me again,weird.
π: 0 β©: 0
"Or just don't have one." That's a ridiculuous argument. By that logic;
Don't like rape, don't do it.
Don't like murder (which is what abortion is, at least past the first trimester), don't do it.
Don't like torture, don't do it.
Don't like human trafficking, don't do it.
Don't like ISIS, don't join them.
But don't interfere with other people that do those things.
π: 0 β©: 1
See this is the interesting part.
Terrorism is very different from letting people do what they want with their bodies,there are better things to worry about.
Most abortions after the second trimester are done because the child has painful deformities,or otherwise doesn't have the chance to live a full happy life.
See it's not an argument of logic my dear,it's a situational thing,trying to appose said argument and compare the death of one fetus to the emotional trauma of rape,the horrid ways people sometimes kill their infants after birth without an abortion (this one causes real pain rather than the before), the sick ways people used to and still torture people,the sick situation of human trafficking,the fucked up reasoning for any form of terrorism.
Those are very different situations.
What I believe? Abortion up to 24 weeks is fair game. You don't cause unnecessary pain and it's a reasonable amount of time rather than 4 fucking weeks to find out if you're pregnant or not(which unfortunately some people don't notice till later) and anything past that time span needs to be with good reason.
If you don't like what people are doing to their own bodies that is an important life decision,don't stick your hands in their wombs.
If someone isn't equipped to take care of a kid ,they aren't. Besides,I think it'd do us better to watch the kids that are already in this world.
π: 0 β©: 1
The absolute maximum abortion's even remotely acceptable is 12 weeks. anything after that's as bad as killing a born baby, and in the case of the more gruesome methods, it's worse. when what a person does with their body involves destroying someone else's body, that's everybody's business.
π: 0 β©: 1
I don't believe you know but abortion is painless of everyone involved,just not emotionally. Believe it or not we prefer not to cause the fetus (which is not a baby) pain.
And once again,I reiterate, horrible deformities justify late term abortions.
You think I like abortion? No. Ask any pro choice if they like abortion,they'll tell you no.
I understand your argument.
I understand that you feel it's a baby,but in reality it's not as conxious and in my opinion,after OPENLY looking at both sides of the issue,I felt that logically it was a necessary evil.
π: 0 β©: 1
Au contraire, foetuses can feel pain as early as 8 weeks. As I said, a million kids growing up in the system would be worth it to prevent one abortion.
π: 0 β©: 1
Huh,interestingly enough I didn't know that, most people write it off. But either way, abortions still are done to prevent as much pain as possible
π: 0 β©: 1
Then it should be limited to the first trimester, after that it's perfectly okay to force the mother to carry it to term, barring their life's in danger.
π: 0 β©: 1
I don't agree with you there,once again,painful deformities,and I still stand by my 24 week limit.
π: 1 β©: 1
Then you need a bullet in the head.
π: 0 β©: 1
Yeah wishing death on me isn't very prolife
π: 1 β©: 1
I wouldn't see you getting a bullet in the head as any different from a serial killer or a member of ISIS getting killed. Not all lives are valuable, serial killers, rapists and members of ISIS for example.
π: 0 β©: 1
Wooooowwwwwwieeee I'm impressed you jumped and said IM a murderer for not accepting your political veiw,id love to keep up with wonderful conversation but seeing as you have nothing but insults rather than a good debate I have better things to do
π: 1 β©: 1
| Next =>