HOME | DD

PlanetBloopy — Ice Equilibrium Machine

Published: 2007-01-21 15:05:22 +0000 UTC; Views: 438; Favourites: 0; Downloads: 8
Redirect to original
Description Just like a painting, an invention is born of ideas and creativity, and in a way, that makes it art.

Countless people have attempted to design and even build perpetual motion machines, and they've been doing this for much longer than the laws of thermodynamics have been around. Now I am one of those people, and Bloopy's Ice Equilibrium Machine is my idea. When water becomes frozen, it exhibits a force which can split trees, crack rocks, and burst pipes. People have considered harnessing this power before, but I have no idea if they ever made any progress. An interesting question is whether the force of water expanding into ice could generate enough energy to be used to melt itself and start the process over! My diagram (drawn in biro and edited in Ulead PhotoImpact) shows a cross-section of a machine which I've drawn only to convey my idea. A serious design would have to be left up to the experts!

How it works (or doesn't): water just a few degrees above freezing point is placed into the machine which is at a few degrees below freezing point, causing the water to freeze. As the water freezes, it pushes up and causes some dynamos to spin, generating electricity which is then stored. When the water has expanded enough, it hits a switch which sends the electricity to generate heat in some way and melt the ice. To keep the machine cold enough to freeze the ice again, any excess warmth must be transferred off.
Related content
Comments: 7

PaulPower [2007-01-31 11:06:21 +0000 UTC]

To keep the machine cold enough to freeze the ice again, any excess warmth must be transferred off.

This is certainly a problem area. To cool the machine down again, you need to transfer heat from the cold machine to the (presumably warmer) environment, and that needs a pump.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PlanetBloopy In reply to PaulPower [2007-02-01 11:17:27 +0000 UTC]

Well, it would be preferrable for the chosen environment to be slightly colder, very large, and highly thermally conductive. A pump would not be needed for a long time in that case. Or, perhaps the excess heat could be converted back into electricity?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PaulPower In reply to PlanetBloopy [2007-02-01 14:35:11 +0000 UTC]

Thing is, as soon as you start talking about converting heat into electricity, then bam! Energy efficiency goes out the window.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PlanetBloopy In reply to PaulPower [2007-02-02 05:22:28 +0000 UTC]

Sounds like a proof of the equation: Physicists = Noobs.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Alien-King [2007-01-28 11:30:29 +0000 UTC]

Friction. You need to find a way to remove friction completely. Only then, can you hope to start to make something that is 100% efficient.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PlanetBloopy In reply to Alien-King [2007-01-29 08:25:57 +0000 UTC]

Hmm, the friction is an afterthought really. If the expanding ice could generate more energy than what was required to melt it in the first place, then it could probably account for the friction.

If you could remove all friction completely, a dynamo could probably spin forever generating electricity, and you wouldn't need any ice...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

meszka [2007-01-21 16:44:12 +0000 UTC]

Hmmm interesting idea...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0