HOME | DD

Description

Okay, so all this fuss about guns is so astronomically senseless. These people that get it into their heads that it’s okay to suspend a young child for doing what young children tend to do, imagine, are degenerate and psychologically unsound. The child who did this meant absolutely nothing! But, according to the people at the school, the kid had a gun, and this was cause for suspension. Everybody knows that the only harm that pastries can do is give a person hypertension, rather than shoot bullets. Thus saying, the attending teacher obviously had schizophrenia (hallucinating), which most likely will need immediate admittance to a psychological ward, where he/she can receive the proper care. Those in power above said teacher need even more immediate and intensive care, as they actually believed the teacher’s delusional raving.

The argument that such signs can forewarn of some sort of emotional breakdown leading to another massacre like Columbine are just as mentally unstable, as a seven-year-old does not have the type of emotional instability or impulsiveness of an adolescent, (most of the killers in the school shootings are adolescents) and so would not be so inclined to shoot people. The act of shooting a gun in and of itself would also probably scare the child so much that they would immediately cease firing. Also, most seven year olds simply can’t aim a gun, no matter the type. So, even if the deafening report of the gun did not deter the child, they still wouldn’t cause very much damage, due to not being able to hit anyone. Have you ever shot a pistol? They kick fairly hard, depending on the caliber.

The case with the girl being suspended for talking about shooting her “hello kitty” gun that shoots bubbles is special, though. The people in charge really showed good initiative in getting this child out of school for a day or two. They really saved lives there! After all, who’s to know that she didn’t lace her bubble-fluid with some acid or other toxin? Or, does she blow up the bubbles with some airborne toxin like cyanide? She could have gone on a killing rampage, and nobody would have known it was her. Unless she wore a gas mask to counteract the cyanide. Of course, according to the TSA, she is also probably only one of a large terrorist cell of six year-old girls in the country with poisonous bubble guns. I can see it now: Hundreds of first-graders coming to school with their death machines and laying waste to entire schools. In all seriousness, the insanity of such an idea is practically tangible. But how do we know that this actually isn’t the type of thing that goes through the school officials’ heads as they suspend these children? With the kind of comments that these people release, you could interpret their actions as having any kind of motive or forethought. Even that of insanity.

Description

Okay, so all this fuss about guns is so astronomically senseless. These people that get it into their heads that it’s okay to suspend a young child for doing what young children tend to do, imagine, are degenerate and psychologically unsound. The child who did this meant absolutely nothing! But, according to the people at the school, the kid had a gun, and this was cause for suspension. Everybody knows that the only harm that pastries can do is give a person hypertension, rather than shoot bullets. Thus saying, the attending teacher obviously had schizophrenia (hallucinating), which most likely will need immediate admittance to a psychological ward, where he/she can receive the proper care. Those in power above said teacher need even more immediate and intensive care, as they actually believed the teacher’s delusional raving.

The argument that such signs can forewarn of some sort of emotional breakdown leading to another massacre like Columbine are just as mentally unstable, as a seven-year-old does not have the type of emotional instability or impulsiveness of an adolescent, (most of the killers in the school shootings are adolescents) and so would not be so inclined to shoot people. The act of shooting a gun in and of itself would also probably scare the child so much that they would immediately cease firing. Also, most seven year olds simply can’t aim a gun, no matter the type. So, even if the deafening report of the gun did not deter the child, they still wouldn’t cause very much damage, due to not being able to hit anyone. Have you ever shot a pistol? They kick fairly hard, depending on the caliber.

The case with the girl being suspended for talking about shooting her “hello kitty” gun that shoots bubbles is special, though. The people in charge really showed good initiative in getting this child out of school for a day or two. They really saved lives there! After all, who’s to know that she didn’t lace her bubble-fluid with some acid or other toxin? Or, does she blow up the bubbles with some airborne toxin like cyanide? She could have gone on a killing rampage, and nobody would have known it was her. Unless she wore a gas mask to counteract the cyanide. Of course, according to the TSA, she is also probably only one of a large terrorist cell of six year-old girls in the country with poisonous bubble guns. I can see it now: Hundreds of first-graders coming to school with their death machines and laying waste to entire schools. In all seriousness, the insanity of such an idea is practically tangible. But how do we know that this actually isn’t the type of thing that goes through the school officials’ heads as they suspend these children? With the kind of comments that these people release, you could interpret their actions as having any kind of motive or forethought. Even that of insanity.