HOME | DD

Quantum808 β€” PRR Challanger (What if)

#challenger #prr #sprite #steamlocomotive #whatif
Published: 2020-02-05 20:46:15 +0000 UTC; Views: 2295; Favourites: 20; Downloads: 13
Redirect to original
Description

Part of the 'What if?' series.


I thought up this idea when i scanning through my main faves, and as i faved 's Fetter Challenger awhile back. It got me to think,'What if the Pennsy had a Challenger?'; To be honest, it doesn't look too bad within Pennsy specification and style. Except, as the Challenger is a 4-6-6-4, it would have to run under the GG prefix (preferably higher than GG4); plus this would be perfect for running passenger coaches from time to time.


Parts - , , and

Modified to PRR Spec - ME

Sprite - ME

Related content
Comments: 9

luis18artist [2020-02-06 19:19:51 +0000 UTC]

There are other famous PRR locos that never saw the light of Day

There were plans for a 4-6-4 HudsonΒ 
, a 4-8-4 Northern and new Steam Turbine locomotive known as V1 Class

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Quantum808 In reply to luis18artist [2020-02-06 19:22:02 +0000 UTC]

hmm, thanks for telling me this.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

luis18artist In reply to Quantum808 [2020-02-06 22:36:03 +0000 UTC]

Thats something i love to do

Locomotives that were planned and were never built

They usually are really unique ideas

Other famous Unbuilt locomotive examples are the Proposed Lima 4-8-6 and 2-12-6 engines

This is a diagram of the 2-12-6

4.bp.blogspot.com/_HtShKGn4UJI…

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

JNSDF-Kozuke [2020-02-05 20:53:32 +0000 UTC]

Interesting indeed.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Quantum808 In reply to JNSDF-Kozuke [2020-02-05 20:55:41 +0000 UTC]

thanks

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JNSDF-Kozuke In reply to Quantum808 [2020-02-05 20:56:52 +0000 UTC]

No problem

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ThatAwkwardDiesel [2020-02-05 20:51:19 +0000 UTC]

Very nice!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Quantum808 In reply to ThatAwkwardDiesel [2020-02-05 20:54:10 +0000 UTC]

thanks

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ThatAwkwardDiesel In reply to Quantum808 [2020-02-05 21:16:34 +0000 UTC]

You're welcome!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0