HOME | DD

RobCaswell — Course Correction

Published: 2012-04-25 04:43:04 +0000 UTC; Views: 8024; Favourites: 146; Downloads: 379
Redirect to original
Description A bit more fun with Bazze's A-4 Skyhawk model, doing Ye Olde Boxart presentation. DAZ Studio render.
Related content
Comments: 51

Coffeebean2 [2015-06-15 07:32:28 +0000 UTC]

An A-4 in US markings carrying French Magic R.350 missiles (I think R.350)?

Now, this is interesting.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to Coffeebean2 [2015-11-17 18:06:48 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, just went with what the model featured on this one....

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

executioner-ed [2012-07-11 22:53:41 +0000 UTC]

the scooter is one of my fave 5 airplanes. nicely done, even if we had to steal some french missiles for the mission...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to executioner-ed [2012-07-12 18:26:04 +0000 UTC]

LOL! Glad ya like

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Neworldisorder [2012-07-10 07:14:51 +0000 UTC]

Nice !

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to Neworldisorder [2012-07-10 14:56:56 +0000 UTC]

Thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

AndromedaMaritimus [2012-04-28 02:31:37 +0000 UTC]

Awesome image!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to AndromedaMaritimus [2012-04-30 15:41:54 +0000 UTC]

Hey, thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AndromedaMaritimus In reply to RobCaswell [2012-04-30 16:11:40 +0000 UTC]

You're very welcome!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Deepblu742 [2012-04-26 03:21:58 +0000 UTC]

Purty, glad to see some more aviation stuff from you. Judging from the markings, this is a Nam era A-4? Usually thought they did strategic bombing etc and didn't carry offensive armament...maybe I watched too many docs where the Corsairs and Phantoms got all the dogfighting glory.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to Deepblu742 [2012-04-26 15:41:28 +0000 UTC]

Aye - this is 'Nam era. As mentioned above my load out options were pretty fixed unless I wanted to go pirating other models... which I may yet do at some future date

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Deepblu742 In reply to RobCaswell [2012-04-30 01:56:28 +0000 UTC]

Ah read ya Lima Charlie. A-4 wiki says them Skyhawks sometimes carried Sidewinders for defensive purposes in Nam so itsa all good...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Spookiie65 [2012-04-26 03:00:08 +0000 UTC]

Very photo realistic Arcass!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to Spookiie65 [2012-04-26 15:40:03 +0000 UTC]

Thanks. I think the thing really needs a specualar map... better bump map, and weathering... to sell itself for closeups, but at least I feel like I got a good lighting solution on this one. Your ex-Navy too, if I recall??

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Spookiie65 In reply to RobCaswell [2012-04-30 03:43:59 +0000 UTC]

Yup Navy for 11 years and an Aircraft Carrier was my first home afloat but we used the F-18 Hornets and A-6 Avengers as primary craft then.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to Spookiie65 [2012-04-30 15:42:26 +0000 UTC]

I loved the A6.... such an ugly beast. So dragonfly-like.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

dinobatfan [2012-04-25 22:26:36 +0000 UTC]

Whoooeeee!!! Yeah baby!!! I love all your work, but planes are awesome and a joyous sight too!!! Yah hooo!!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to dinobatfan [2012-04-26 15:38:42 +0000 UTC]

And your a Navy guy - yes?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

dinobatfan In reply to RobCaswell [2012-04-27 04:01:22 +0000 UTC]

Oh yes. Ex now though. Although I guess to a degree I can rightfully now say, once Navy, Always Navy. I know that generally applies to the Marine Corps, but I think it can apply to all the services. As for me being Navy...yep..24 years worth. And I hadn't planned to beyond my initial 4 originally. Isn't it funny how things work out?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

wraithbf109 [2012-04-25 18:10:09 +0000 UTC]

Looks great! The only issue I see is the payload, both aircraft appear to be carrying a load of Matra R.550 Magic missiles, which would not be appropriate for an USN aircraft.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to wraithbf109 [2012-04-26 15:38:12 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, the ordnance is... well, not really configurable. If i was gonna do this up proper I'd probably have to steal some weapons off another model and parent 'em in. Something for the future!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

AbaKon [2012-04-25 17:24:50 +0000 UTC]

Looks like I picked the wrong day to stop sniffing glue...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to AbaKon [2012-04-26 15:36:39 +0000 UTC]

Roger, Over.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Thomas-Peters [2012-04-25 17:22:42 +0000 UTC]

A classic view of the Skyhawk. And just enough room for the model company's logo!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to Thomas-Peters [2012-04-26 15:36:04 +0000 UTC]

And for the price sticker when I try to sell off my extra kit at an IPMS show

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Ptrope [2012-04-25 14:35:20 +0000 UTC]

Snappy! (or gluey, depending on your modeling skill level ). You get the sky lighting perfect every time - you must spend a lot of time in the real world .

(The car nut in me wants that belly tank!)

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to Ptrope [2012-04-26 15:35:24 +0000 UTC]

And what would your car nut self want with a big-ass belly tank???

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Ptrope In reply to RobCaswell [2012-04-26 18:26:50 +0000 UTC]

Why, to make a belly-tank Lakester, of course!! [link] Classic streamliner race car for places like Bonneville - been doing it since WWII .

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to Ptrope [2012-04-26 19:02:23 +0000 UTC]

OOooooooo! I don't recall seeing one before. NEATO! I want one as my commuting vehicle!...

... though after that last speeding ticket, three weeks ago, you'd think I'd learned my lesson?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TheCentipede [2012-04-25 13:25:46 +0000 UTC]

<--- Aerospace engineer/nerd time: the skin on the leading edges of the wings don't really hold up this close at this angle, but that's mostly because I've wandered around and around a static display A-4 they've got aboard USS Midway (she's been turned into a museum). I wouldn't be opposed to going again and taking lots of pictures for skin improvements if anyone's interested.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

RobCaswell In reply to TheCentipede [2012-04-26 15:31:51 +0000 UTC]

Hey, don't hold back your crits, man! It's all appreciated! I agree that the model has some shortcomings when it comes to close-up work... but it IS a freebie Ya get what ya pay for. If I were doing actual paying boxart I'd throw a lot more resources and digital paint time into this. At the very least I'd like to try and tackle a different paint scheme - maybe for one of the birds flying off CV(A)N-65? One of my old Hasegawa kits used to have marking for that, but.... it's long gone and I haven't been able to scare up any pics or profiles of those markings online.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TheCentipede In reply to RobCaswell [2012-04-28 20:07:25 +0000 UTC]

I don't know which one's aboard Midway but I'll scare up the pictures I've already taken and see what the plane's done up as if you'd like.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to TheCentipede [2012-04-30 15:58:19 +0000 UTC]

Sure!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TheCentipede In reply to RobCaswell [2012-05-01 06:27:16 +0000 UTC]

Well, I can only find one of me right in front of an A-4, which is great for scale but otherwise not so grand. Oh well, sounds like an excuse to visit Midway again...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to TheCentipede [2012-05-08 15:37:52 +0000 UTC]

Aw, c'mon... you don't need an excuse!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TheCentipede In reply to RobCaswell [2012-05-08 18:32:36 +0000 UTC]

I have a strong genetic predisposition towards airplane addiction. I need an excuse or else I'd be watching airplanes all day every day.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to TheCentipede [2012-05-09 17:39:56 +0000 UTC]

Ditto. When it comes to aircraft, I'm definitely my father's son.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Deepblu742 In reply to TheCentipede [2012-04-26 03:39:25 +0000 UTC]

Are you talking about the rendering of the leading edge slats and sometimes shiny and irregular texture of the skin? Arcass cranks out beautiful works but usually isn't usually a stickler for absolute anal-level gritty realism. His strength is outputting more tasty-looking work in a month than most of us have in years...

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

RobCaswell In reply to Deepblu742 [2012-04-26 15:34:49 +0000 UTC]

LOL! That's me! "Art by the pound!"
Thanks. You're right in that most of what I do is more "digital doodle" than "refined art". Just something to unwind from a day of tending everyone ELSE'S art. But trust me, I can get plenty anal about things when the job demands it. I just don't usually work to that level 75% of the time. DA is largely a sort of "digital sketchbook" for me

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Deepblu742 In reply to RobCaswell [2012-04-30 02:03:18 +0000 UTC]

That's good to hear then brother. Yeah, I've been there...going cross-eyed for other's glory and then making something COMPLETELY different for yourself. Similar idea of when Goya was a Royal painter making boring portraits of inbred nobles only to paint ogres devouring their children at night, haha!

You got a blog with some other work like Steve Berg or something?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to Deepblu742 [2012-04-30 16:01:31 +0000 UTC]

Nope. This is my bloggiest thing out there

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TheCentipede In reply to Deepblu742 [2012-04-26 04:21:37 +0000 UTC]

Well, yeah. I'm not blaming him or anything.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Deepblu742 In reply to TheCentipede [2012-04-26 04:34:48 +0000 UTC]

Course not! Wasn't meant to be a quibble, we need folks like yourself to help keep it real. No harm in poppin' him out his comfort zone once in awhile anywho...hehe.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

GrahamTG [2012-04-25 09:39:35 +0000 UTC]

Very cool, I'd definitely buy one. Had the pleasure of chatting with Roy Cross a couple of years ago, he was the main Airfix box artist for many decades, terrific artist and a true gentleman.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to GrahamTG [2012-04-26 15:27:42 +0000 UTC]

When you actually meet talent like that, what we do feels a bit like cheating, eh?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

gazzatrek [2012-04-25 08:25:27 +0000 UTC]

yeap.pure Hasegawa box top! I'd buy it!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to gazzatrek [2012-04-26 15:26:59 +0000 UTC]

Yeah....probably vintage '79, I'm guessing

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Zhaanman [2012-04-25 04:58:04 +0000 UTC]

Oh Ho Ho Hboooo this is Swweeta!! No sunset to say that's why it looks good here!!! This is a work of Art and aircraft!!! I'm Lovin every aspect of these Beauties Very impressive look I can almost hear the sonic Boom!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RobCaswell In reply to Zhaanman [2012-04-26 15:26:33 +0000 UTC]

Turn up your speakers!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Zhaanman In reply to RobCaswell [2012-04-26 16:54:59 +0000 UTC]

Oh Yea Ha!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0