HOME | DD

Rofelrolf — Frostfire Weapon Concept Rolf Bertz

Published: 2013-03-23 19:28:36 +0000 UTC; Views: 44896; Favourites: 940; Downloads: 1011
Redirect to original
Related content
Comments: 25

iceogre [2017-09-29 08:42:52 +0000 UTC]

The "Ammo" Canister is poorly placed.
It should be a lot more horizontal giving the user better aiming potential.
Love the overall look of the design though.

👍: 2 ⏩: 0

DRamos97 [2017-09-23 18:13:57 +0000 UTC]

Because a paradox is literally mind-blowing.

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

Lou331 [2016-04-15 19:53:46 +0000 UTC]

You Sir, have some very good weapon designs.....

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

KiteBoy1 [2014-12-30 02:23:26 +0000 UTC]

super cool! This rifle fires up powerful energy beam. Am I correct?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

IMABOsDraWeR [2014-09-02 19:55:58 +0000 UTC]

Nice design

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

elfcrazy22 [2014-01-01 15:53:59 +0000 UTC]

very nice concept

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ngowan [2013-12-29 18:05:27 +0000 UTC]

this look really cool, nice concept. what software was this modeled in?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Quesocito [2013-10-18 09:06:07 +0000 UTC]

very cool

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

CyborgSpartan [2013-09-20 02:24:50 +0000 UTC]

It's almost like a tesla coil, but it's not.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

303vegas [2013-09-17 11:59:34 +0000 UTC]

I could do with one of these during rush-hour!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

DONW999 [2013-08-05 01:25:45 +0000 UTC]

Love the demo Pic!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Aliskus [2013-07-15 17:53:44 +0000 UTC]

well done!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

asaenvolk [2013-07-15 01:40:11 +0000 UTC]

so its just call "frostfire" because it has a blue color and not because it is a weapon that uses a freeing effect?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ad-referendum [2013-06-18 10:50:01 +0000 UTC]

The magazine of Frostfire is placed in a position that "seems to hinder" the sight during aiming, but the image displayed on the lower right seems to tell us...the proper aiming of Frostfire is aiming by "over looking the magazine itself", this is indeed a very cool concept. From the lower right image, I presume the Frostfire is a close-range energy-carbine...shall this be true, a perfect aiming system well indeed not of a need when damage plays more of an importance in close-range.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Emeraldseven In reply to ad-referendum [2013-07-10 20:57:07 +0000 UTC]

i doubt you would be doing much aiming with this gun ._.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ad-referendum In reply to Emeraldseven [2013-07-10 23:13:45 +0000 UTC]

So, it is a "slug-shotgun" type of weaponry then?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

cinemajack [2013-06-07 17:52:50 +0000 UTC]

Kickass!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Silverlion [2013-05-25 23:31:20 +0000 UTC]

Of course it might have "weave" as you change the air pressure due to temperature changes...causing the weapon to shift to whatever side is already emphasized from a dead even straight shot.

Awesome by the way.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MoonlitCrescent [2013-05-25 21:36:21 +0000 UTC]

How's the recoil?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Rofelrolf In reply to MoonlitCrescent [2013-05-25 23:00:27 +0000 UTC]

oO oh, I down`t know. but now that you mention it, I think there is no recoil because there is no ballistic acceleration.
but a very good quastion^^!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MoonlitCrescent In reply to Rofelrolf [2013-05-25 23:28:49 +0000 UTC]

Yes, but it's still propelling plasma(?) forwards so it should have some kind...

Pretty cool though.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

EumenesOfCardia In reply to MoonlitCrescent [2013-05-26 12:29:23 +0000 UTC]

It would depend on the mass. Force = mass * acceleration. The acceleration is large (assuming like a bullet) but if the mass of the plasma is less than that of the bullet, there will be less recoil. I'm not sure how the gun works. If it uses the Hall Effect, then there will be some recoil. If it is just throwing electric charges out to generate plasma, then it will have no recoil but will be crazy dangerous (like electric plasma everywhere)

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MoonlitCrescent In reply to EumenesOfCardia [2013-05-26 21:58:42 +0000 UTC]

I don't know about you, but I don't know much about how much the amount of plasma fired by a theoretical rifle would weigh, unsurprisingly... but it must have some.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

EumenesOfCardia In reply to MoonlitCrescent [2013-05-27 02:40:13 +0000 UTC]

Well, like I said. It depends on the mechanism.

If it fires ionized gas using the Hall effect, then it will have a sustained and targeted arc, but the spray of gas would weigh some amount (from what is shown, it must be at least 2 grams though probably closer to 10) so it would have the recoil of a paintball gun (think of the compressed air in a paintball gun being the primary mode of fire rather than the actual ball. Even without the ball, the force is the same).

If it fires electrons ad-hoc, then it would be, more-or-less, a bolt of electricity and would have 0 recoil. The effect is the same as a laser, electrons aren't being propelled as much as they are just transferring their energy to adjacent electrons resulting in the ionizing of the air around it (very little mass, very little acceleration = practically zero force).

From the look of the weapon's concentrated fire though, either it is the former mechanism or the target is made of metal in a room full of plastic

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MoonlitCrescent In reply to EumenesOfCardia [2013-05-28 17:25:35 +0000 UTC]

Very true

I would be inclined to believe it's option #1, as it seems the most practical (in a weapon). ^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 0