HOME | DD

sandrock74 — Bootless Rey

Published: 2015-10-23 19:12:25 +0000 UTC; Views: 29729; Favourites: 367; Downloads: 192
Redirect to original
Description The Force indeed is awakening! From "Star Wars Episode VII: The Force Awakens", comes the as yet mysterious girl we currently only know as Rey. I thought she was a cutie since first seeing her in the teasers, so I've been meaning to getting around adding her into the Bootless Series. This should mark another first as well, since I don't think she's been in any fetish related artwork just yet. You saw her here first! 

Rey belongs to Lucasfilm.
Related content
Comments: 73

sandrock74 In reply to ??? [2019-08-14 17:16:39 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Roger72Yamato In reply to sandrock74 [2019-08-14 20:12:44 +0000 UTC]

I would enjoy her feet ^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Lilith-Crowe [2019-03-22 13:26:34 +0000 UTC]

She looks so pretty here. I really don't like her character but you made her look beautiful here are least. Those feet must be so warm from all the sand...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sandrock74 In reply to Lilith-Crowe [2019-03-22 15:23:46 +0000 UTC]

Thanks! This was the first time I drew her. Boy, that seems so long ago now! Love her or hate her, I do think Rey is a cutie!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Lilith-Crowe In reply to sandrock74 [2019-03-22 15:30:06 +0000 UTC]

I wouldn't say I hate her, I just hate how she's written.


I do think she's adorable though. Plus, she's like the only celeb to have a foot based deepfake at the minute.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sandrock74 In reply to Lilith-Crowe [2019-03-22 16:40:27 +0000 UTC]

A deepfake?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Lilith-Crowe In reply to sandrock74 [2019-03-22 16:45:08 +0000 UTC]

I know! You would think there would be some more deepfakes involving feet out there.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sandrock74 In reply to Lilith-Crowe [2019-03-22 19:00:43 +0000 UTC]

What is a deepfake?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Lilith-Crowe In reply to sandrock74 [2019-03-22 19:09:12 +0000 UTC]

Oh, you're a boomer. Right, I'll explain.


Basically, it is a system that uses an AI which will map one face over another and it is really realistic. There was one of Henry Cavill and it looked better than the CGI on his face in Justice League. And Daisy seems to be really popular for it, second only to Emma Watson as far as I've seen. She also has the only foot deepfake I've ever seen. It gets a little glitchy when her foot moves in front of the face but for the most part, it's quite good.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sandrock74 In reply to Lilith-Crowe [2019-03-22 19:33:36 +0000 UTC]

I'm not a boomer, I'm Gen X all the way, baby!

I never saw any of these. I'd be interested in seeing some. Where can I see them?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Lilith-Crowe In reply to sandrock74 [2019-03-22 19:40:38 +0000 UTC]

Wait, how old are you?


There's some on PronHub and it has a few sites dedicated to it. You can pretty much just google "[name] deepfake" and find it. And if you find any of feet other than the Daisy Ridley one, let me know.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sandrock74 In reply to Lilith-Crowe [2019-03-22 20:05:38 +0000 UTC]

I'm just north of 40

I found the Daisy Ridley one. That was a bang up job! I also found one of Anna Kendrick. When will people start making tickle deepfakes??

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Lilith-Crowe In reply to sandrock74 [2019-03-22 20:13:25 +0000 UTC]

Damn. Most burning paper bags I know look way worse at that age. Who's the person in your other pic, btw? The blue haired one with the sign?

An Anna Kendrick foot one? Nice, I'll give it a look at some point.

As for tickle deepfakes, hopefully soon. I wouldn't mind seeing Cate Blanchett or Elizabeth Olsen getting it. There's one video on PronHub called "Itchy Interview Tickles" I would love to see used for it, although you'd have to get a good fit for the two girls.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sandrock74 In reply to Lilith-Crowe [2019-03-22 20:23:31 +0000 UTC]

LOL! My avatar is just a silly picture I found online. It suits me though. The blue haired lady holding the sign with my name is a cosplayer. She was doing the sign picture thing a while back and she did one for me. She posed a lot barefoot, which was nice of her; a real sweetheart.

Those are nice choices for tickling deepfakes. I just got a barefoot Hela print from Scott Blair this week and framed it. It looks just like her from "Thor:Ragnarok"! I hope he'll do some more Marvel babes too, so they can accompany the Margot Robbie as Harley Quinn and Gal Gadot as Wonder Woman ones I got and framed too

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Lilith-Crowe In reply to sandrock74 [2019-03-22 20:31:56 +0000 UTC]

Oh, right. She sounds nice enough.


I like his stuff. He has done Black Widow, Scarlett Witch and Nebula before. I would have gotten the Hela one but I don't have a patreon.


I wasn't the biggest fan of Ragnarok but I loved her in it. I couldn't stop thinking of her feet during it though. She just exudes "I am your dream dom!" in the way she looks and talks. Then I found this: 

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

ANGFXQUEEN In reply to Lilith-Crowe [2019-03-22 20:48:16 +0000 UTC]

Hey, thank you 😘👣❤

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Lilith-Crowe In reply to ANGFXQUEEN [2019-03-22 20:49:31 +0000 UTC]

Oh hey! I didn't know you'd get notified when I linked your piece. It's very good, thanks for doing it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

sandrock74 In reply to Lilith-Crowe [2019-03-22 20:35:51 +0000 UTC]

He has a store on ebay, that's where I bought the prints from. Pinupeyecandy is the name of his store, you should check it out. He's always adding stuff.

I also bought the original artwork of Kate Beckinsale and Jennifer Garner having their feet tickled from another artist. Great stuff! I just need to figure out where to hang all these! lol

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Lilith-Crowe In reply to sandrock74 [2019-03-22 20:38:56 +0000 UTC]

Maybe I will. I'm very poor so it may be difficult.


Had you already seen that pic btw? You didn't seem surprised by it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sandrock74 In reply to Lilith-Crowe [2019-03-22 20:42:31 +0000 UTC]

Oh, yeah. I saw that before. Fakes are always fun!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Lilith-Crowe In reply to sandrock74 [2019-03-22 20:45:32 +0000 UTC]

Oh right. Yeah, a good fake is always great. I'm really surprised you didn't know they came in video form now.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sandrock74 In reply to Lilith-Crowe [2019-03-22 21:42:09 +0000 UTC]

I'm usually metaphorically chained to the art board! That's my excuse and I'm sticking to it 😎

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Lilith-Crowe In reply to sandrock74 [2019-03-22 21:45:16 +0000 UTC]

And now you're thinking about someone being *literally* chained to your art board.

Still, better late than never, yeah?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sandrock74 In reply to Lilith-Crowe [2019-03-22 22:44:36 +0000 UTC]

Indeed! At least I'm at the party now!

Speaking of someone being chained to my art board, I need a new model who will pose for me again. The last was a friend of mine, but she did it 2 years ago. Time for a new batch of poses and pics!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Lilith-Crowe In reply to sandrock74 [2019-03-23 07:26:39 +0000 UTC]

Hopefully you can find one.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Hovomo [2017-10-26 12:05:32 +0000 UTC]

Love Rey 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sandrock74 In reply to Hovomo [2017-10-26 18:16:19 +0000 UTC]

You and me both!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

JohnStewart34 [2017-04-05 22:25:29 +0000 UTC]

Please do more of Rey there aren't many good ones

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Movie-Man [2015-12-20 09:02:36 +0000 UTC]

Well, I was right. I mean besides Finn and Kylo Ren, Rey turned out to be a favorite character of mine.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sandrock74 In reply to Movie-Man [2015-12-21 00:15:12 +0000 UTC]

I just saw it today. Rey is awesome! I may have to do another pic of her soon

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Movie-Man In reply to sandrock74 [2015-12-21 00:20:36 +0000 UTC]

Cool, cool.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

lotp75 [2015-11-06 16:30:19 +0000 UTC]

Lovely soles

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sandrock74 In reply to lotp75 [2015-11-06 17:02:12 +0000 UTC]

Glad you like them

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

sharkdragon96 [2015-10-26 03:13:08 +0000 UTC]

Thus, the rule 34 has begun!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sandrock74 In reply to sharkdragon96 [2015-10-26 21:38:39 +0000 UTC]

Or.....the Rule 34 Awakens

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

herbsmall [2015-10-24 13:40:07 +0000 UTC]

Since the movie hasn't come out, I obviously don't have any attachment to the character yet, but this is a beautiful piece of art. At least we know one good thing will come out of the new Star Wars movie: this artwork.

Kudos if you were the first artists to "fetishize" her.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sandrock74 In reply to herbsmall [2015-10-24 22:27:27 +0000 UTC]

I don't know 100% that I am, but I haven't seen anything else of her yet, so I'll claim to be the first

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Movie-Man [2015-10-24 03:20:35 +0000 UTC]

Rey's bound to become one of my favorite characters. Will Captain Phasma get the same treatment?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sandrock74 In reply to Movie-Man [2015-10-24 03:26:58 +0000 UTC]

Already declaring her a fave? Isn't that premature? Is the Force telling you something??

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Movie-Man In reply to sandrock74 [2015-10-24 03:42:04 +0000 UTC]

Well, not completely; there's still the movie to see but she has potential.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

bestmed [2015-10-24 00:17:25 +0000 UTC]

Cool. it will be interesting to see if the new movie is any good. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sandrock74 In reply to bestmed [2015-10-24 02:35:41 +0000 UTC]

I have a confidence with Episode VII that I didn't have with the original trilogy.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

bestmed In reply to sandrock74 [2015-10-24 02:41:49 +0000 UTC]

I guess I'm biased. I also don't think much of J.J. Abrams. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sandrock74 In reply to bestmed [2015-10-24 02:48:19 +0000 UTC]

Abrams introduced me to Jennifer Garner via Alias, so I'm willing to have good will towards him for this

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

bestmed In reply to sandrock74 [2015-10-24 03:04:52 +0000 UTC]

I can't forgive him for the Star Trek reboot. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Neville6000 In reply to bestmed [2016-05-07 04:43:18 +0000 UTC]

What the frack was CBS Studios (the actual owner of Star Trek; Paramount's the licencee authorized to make movies) supposed to do? The franchise had to be revitalized, and Abrams was the best guy to do it. Who do you think could do a better job (and it better be realistic as to who could do it.)

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

bestmed In reply to Neville6000 [2016-05-08 15:46:25 +0000 UTC]

I don't think they needed to do a reboot at all. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

sandrock74 In reply to bestmed [2015-10-24 03:09:35 +0000 UTC]

I can't forgive Paramount for the Star Trek reboot. Place blame where it belongs

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

bestmed In reply to sandrock74 [2015-10-24 03:18:32 +0000 UTC]

Sounds like there is plenty to go around. 
I would have gone with movies set in the time of ST 2,3 and 4 but on a different ship, with a different crew. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

sandrock74 In reply to bestmed [2015-10-24 03:26:07 +0000 UTC]

I would have continued in the "Prime" timeline, maybe move it ahead a decade or two post Dominion War. I mean, that devastated the Alpha Quadrant! Political lines would logically be redrawn and new alliances formed and such. Instead, what do we get? The Enterprise series and a movie franchise reboot

👍: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>