HOME | DD
saxorrm — Lips
[NSFW]
Published: 2006-08-23 13:32:35 +0000 UTC; Views: 221555; Favourites: 3787; Downloads: 2035
Redirect to original
Description
Lovely lips...Related content
Comments: 373
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
The first thing I noticed was them hairy ape arms
👍: 0 ⏩: 3
Oh shit dude!!! Why did you have to tell me!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Denzel Washington: KING KONG, AIN'T GOT NOTHIN' ON HER!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Please avoid comments like this.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Lol actually, it'd be as natural as it gets if there was hair there
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
erm well there's a difference between bodies and body "parts"
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
As a female, I don't find the photo offensive at all. Women have beautiful bodies, it doesn't bother me at all.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
As a woman I find this distasteful. Nude shots are indeed are but only when done tastefully. This is not at all tasteful in an artistic way.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Well this isn't the lips I meant to find... these are rather weird looking actually.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
your all blind. this isnt art. this is someone trying to gain attention on the internet by flashing herself online.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Assuming that's true, she found an interesting way to do it. Wouldn't that make it art?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
sorry but i find the term "pussy" to be both childish and disrespectful. If you can see this pic you are an adult. I like this pic though
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
it is so much more than srt ... it is human perfection
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
nice photo
is it art? i dont know
but it is a nice shot
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
sorry trolls... but this is art indeed. no simple pussy shot.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Couldn't you at least do this in a slightly more artistic way? All you're trying to do is provoke reactions from perverts, that's obvious.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Kudos to the people shooting down the naysayers here. Anyone can claim something is not art. This does not make it the case. I hate DaDaism. But regardless of how profoundly stupid I find it, it is still art. Period.
Don't like the content? Don't frakkin' look at it. Problem solved. The douchebags clicked on the damn image in the first place knowing full well what it was. They then decided to post negative comments rather than either being constructive...or being a decent human being and keeping their pathetic mouth shut.
Well done photo. We approve.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
this is HORRIBLE, its an art site, not a porn site, ! get it right stuuupid!!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
And you should probably go somewhere else with that nonsense. You clearly do not have a true appreciation of artistic values.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I was just making my point of view. Art can be shown in so many different ways! So, why does it have to be expressed with a vagina?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Because there are many forms that can be considered art, including the human body and the so called "naughty parts" that we are taught from very early on are 'dirty' and 'shameful'and 'sinful'. Keeping an open mind and finding the artistic value in form, regardless of the subject matter and of any societal morality issues that we're force-fed helps one to see the intrinsic value of such subject matters such as this. Instead of being narrow minded and immediately persecuting an image of a vagina (and not even a really explicit picture at that) as 'pornographic' (Wikipedia defines it as "Pornography or porn is the explicit portrayal of sexual subject matter for the purposes of sexual arousal and erotic satisfaction.", by the way.), look at it another way, find the value in the picture, or move on to something else. You have to accept that there are billions of people on this earth, and a nice handful of them (especially artists) find artistic value in the nude human body and all of its parts. Thank you, and have a nice day. 
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>