HOME | DD

shawkash — Dear Brother 2

Published: 2005-11-21 12:21:46 +0000 UTC; Views: 3598; Favourites: 19; Downloads: 463
Redirect to original
Description version 2 of dear brother. David carson(ish) style mixed with my own style.
Yes, I know what you want to say. but that's what I want to do.
Take this for you " Art side of typography" + " I don't care"
Related content
Comments: 73

ro2a [2007-03-12 13:46:33 +0000 UTC]

gamda gedan

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

shawkash In reply to ro2a [2007-03-17 12:46:02 +0000 UTC]

shokran ya basha, da bas men zo2ak

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

cberry240 [2006-09-14 19:18:48 +0000 UTC]

Another piece that looks like it can be pushed a littler further. The body copy on the right doesn't match at all. Try a condensed san serif (like helveticaNueve or frutiger) make it a small point size (8-10pt?) and either wide leading or almost zero leading. Just some suggestions to try and make it a little more interesting and open the page up a little so your eye can 'breathe'

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

shawkash In reply to cberry240 [2006-09-14 20:40:06 +0000 UTC]

It was just an artistic piece, the fonts are all used here for display puproses, just a kind of a vision of how david car5on used to use fonts for same purpose. And yes it mess with readbility some how; cause the main problem between car5on's and other typographers locates in legability and readbility area; as david car5on depends on his artistic sense while he is working, that means I just used his fonts and plaied with them in an artistic piece as an exprement. FYI, I don't consider 8 - 10 pt sizes on screens layouts for body text " 10 point body text is generally not a good idea on-screen. 14-16 point won't look unusually large on a monitor, and will be significantly easier to read than smaller type." Resource: [link]
Also I normally use Verdana, trebuchet MS, or Georgia for screens, sometimes I consider frutiger but it doesn't work on screen better than verdana and terbuchet at least for me. Thank you.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cberry240 In reply to shawkash [2006-09-14 21:10:17 +0000 UTC]

I'm quite familiar with Carson's work. However Carson doesn't have extreme amounts of copy on his work like you do (I'm talking about the copy one the right specfically the paragraphs on top of paragraphs). That's what I was suggesting you fix. If it's purely artistic than it would make more sense to make it pleasing to the eye visually in which case that body copy shouldn't have to be 14-16pt. If you took my suggestions you'd open up some space and allow the eye to move around the piece, which BTW Carson does.

Again these were only a few suggestion and opinions on what I would have done.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

shawkash In reply to cberry240 [2006-09-14 21:26:11 +0000 UTC]

Oh, well please feel free to tell suggestions and opinions as you like, I am used on this kind of talk as it is the normal thing in typography communities.
Let me say: I am not copying car5on. I was just studying him, I collected his fonts and put them in text blocks then used some tricks he used and some tricks I also used to use, and I mixed both in an exprement. When I have done I started to write the text in a messy way with his "wrong font" which he normally use for titles but I used here as a text/copy font with no even orginizing and said if you u can read it, then why not?. Ofcourse if I did that for a client he will kick me out of his office but it was for me a cool artistic piece that made some guys feel free to play in typography. And David Car5on's himself said about it: "it is very good."

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cberry240 In reply to shawkash [2006-09-14 21:29:28 +0000 UTC]

I think we are missing each other's point so I'm just going to drop it. =]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Macflyg4 [2006-01-21 14:01:49 +0000 UTC]

Love the type , not sure why you used Serif Typo's Mixed , to me it looks kinda disturbing. But maybe your assignment was to set the contrast between ordinary and extraordinary

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

shawkash In reply to Macflyg4 [2006-01-21 21:23:17 +0000 UTC]

it is kinda a breaking for rules, because i was trying to apply some davidcar5on's stuff. who just break rules. all these fonts are his design any way thank u for ur nice comment really appreciated

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

trishpacific [2005-12-16 23:41:43 +0000 UTC]

This is so cool. I love the abstract nature of your work, it's very beautiful.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

shawkash In reply to trishpacific [2005-12-16 23:42:49 +0000 UTC]

thank u dear.. i love seeing u commenting in my work

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

mmarwan [2005-12-11 11:41:06 +0000 UTC]

lesa m3alem typograph ya basha

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

shawkash In reply to mmarwan [2005-12-12 11:03:20 +0000 UTC]

allah ykhalek ya 3ami da bas men zo2ak

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

kontrastt [2005-12-04 12:48:46 +0000 UTC]

good text art. nice fonts.
and i really tried to read this... lol

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

shawkash In reply to kontrastt [2005-12-05 12:56:35 +0000 UTC]

ok. why dont u try to do some typography ..

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

AlexeiSolha [2005-12-04 12:39:26 +0000 UTC]

Amazing work, man! It's really beautifuly layouted.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

shawkash In reply to AlexeiSolha [2005-12-05 12:55:23 +0000 UTC]

thank u brother! i am honored for all these nice things u done to me

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

shawkash In reply to AlexeiSolha [2005-12-05 12:50:25 +0000 UTC]

Thank u very much man.. i am glad u like it?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Meekochan [2005-11-29 14:00:40 +0000 UTC]

Very attractive. Mixing the text together and including little pics is very intriguing and interesting. I also like the layout of everything. Nice work. ^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

shawkash In reply to Meekochan [2005-11-29 14:04:00 +0000 UTC]

Thank you! i am glad u liked it

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

buzveatesh [2005-11-29 09:36:02 +0000 UTC]

i like this!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

shawkash In reply to buzveatesh [2005-11-29 09:46:45 +0000 UTC]

Thank you i am glad that u liked it!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

buzveatesh In reply to shawkash [2005-11-29 11:26:57 +0000 UTC]

u r welcome

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

mysterious-life [2005-11-29 09:16:09 +0000 UTC]

Wow,ahmad you've a creative mind

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

mysterious-life In reply to mysterious-life [2005-11-29 19:28:22 +0000 UTC]

you're welcome my friend

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

shawkash In reply to mysterious-life [2005-11-29 09:47:01 +0000 UTC]

Thank u .. thank u for the

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

WithinIllusion [2005-11-28 16:06:25 +0000 UTC]

Wow! There are a lot of words in stuff going on right in this picture alone that is for sure. I do have to say that I like that though and it looks really cool. (Sorry it took me so long to get here and add a comment I'm getting over ran lol.)

Illusion

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

shawkash In reply to WithinIllusion [2005-11-28 19:35:54 +0000 UTC]

lol .. d u really like it?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

selva-amarga [2005-11-28 01:46:00 +0000 UTC]

i like this work, i really do!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

shawkash In reply to selva-amarga [2005-11-28 08:22:05 +0000 UTC]

hey thank u for the nice comment! i am glad u like it!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

backspace-1 [2005-11-26 12:46:19 +0000 UTC]

way to go shawkyyyyyy !

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

shawkash In reply to backspace-1 [2005-11-26 12:54:45 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

fyonka [2005-11-25 08:20:30 +0000 UTC]

great work ya shawkash i like the concept awy - the text very nice
great work ya gamed

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

shawkash In reply to fyonka [2005-11-25 08:25:02 +0000 UTC]

thank u thank u

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

fyonka In reply to shawkash [2005-11-26 20:09:35 +0000 UTC]

u wellcome ya shosho

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

shawkash In reply to fyonka [2005-11-27 09:50:06 +0000 UTC]

shosho

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

fyonka In reply to shawkash [2005-11-27 18:13:23 +0000 UTC]

hehehehhehe

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

shawkash In reply to fyonka [2005-11-27 19:38:16 +0000 UTC]

hmmmmmm hmmm..
we el mawdo3 da by7sal keteer

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Blue-Froggy [2005-11-24 05:56:46 +0000 UTC]

I love this, is so different design, so free, clean, is my fav, you are my teacher Ahmad.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

shawkash In reply to Blue-Froggy [2005-11-24 06:13:42 +0000 UTC]

Hey thank u for this sweet comment, it is more than what i deserve acutally.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Blue-Froggy In reply to shawkash [2005-11-26 04:20:04 +0000 UTC]

You are welcome Ahmad, i like every thing you make.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

shawkash In reply to Blue-Froggy [2005-11-26 07:57:28 +0000 UTC]

Thank u dear

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

kimoz [2005-11-22 09:21:47 +0000 UTC]

zareefa ya wad

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

shawkash In reply to kimoz [2005-11-22 09:23:34 +0000 UTC]

te3gbni we enta deplomaci

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

CapitalSeed [2005-11-22 04:50:10 +0000 UTC]

really nice prose on the side there

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

shawkash In reply to CapitalSeed [2005-11-22 05:28:26 +0000 UTC]

thank you!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Sleeping-Wind [2005-11-22 04:47:46 +0000 UTC]

"Damn Why did u even try read this ?"

I actually try to read it, just to find that note at the end.

In my opinion this one is more "abstract" but I must applaud you for the organization of the texts. (and pics as well.)
they came out very good.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

shawkash In reply to Sleeping-Wind [2005-11-22 05:28:17 +0000 UTC]

lol thank u for ur comment .. i know what u mean

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

deborahdelasio [2005-11-21 23:59:50 +0000 UTC]

Nice!

Deb

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

shawkash In reply to deborahdelasio [2005-11-22 05:27:48 +0000 UTC]

oh! one of ur surprises to me, u left a comment and that made me happy friendo

👍: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>