HOME | DD
Sid-Orange β JW 178 V3
[NSFW]
Published: 2015-08-01 14:18:59 +0000 UTC; Views: 20984; Favourites: 578; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
There is also v2:
ξ¦
Mature Content
Visit my Website: orange.cybersafe.de
and the facebook page
Download contains Hi-Res picture with 1938x1938 pixels.
All Prints and Downloads come without logo or watermark!
Related content
Comments: 17
π: 0 β©: 0
I looked at both the processed and unprocessed under magnifiication and without. In both the edge processing against the tree/leave line looks false. The processed
version removes the skin glare from (flash?) but also adds false shadows in the skin which I find unappealing in closeup. Additionally, skin blush (lips, nipples) is reduced to just darker skin in the processed version. The highlighted hair line is almost completely lost in the processed version as is eye color.
Background coloring on the tree bark loses "reality" and the green of the leaves, instead of being vibrant "alive" and outdoors looks unhealthy. This is especially apparent in
the stems above the model's left elbow and the leaves in the lower left of the photo.
From a distance, the processed version makes the model look temperature "colder". The unprocessed version looks warmer, aside from the greater detail.
I have forgotten much of my photography in the 40 years since I did it seriously, but I believe a polarized filter at approx 3-15 degrees would reduce the skin glare in the unprocessed photo without the loss of detail and "natural" coloring mentioned above.
Separately ending on a positive note, the model's expression is excellent. Mischievous and knowing, the expression emphasizes the impression of "right time, right place" esssential in erotic photography. The original photo is memorable for that alone.
π: 0 β©: 2
If you are using processing that adds more detail to photos during the process then you truly have a wonderful product.Β Note the mole on the cheek, individual hairs, and edge processing on the elbow.Β The "new" "lighter colors" processed version has added light green to stems.Β There is a section of the eyebrow on the right eye in this lighter color version, that is simply not there in the darker version.Β
Perhaps we are lost in semantics.Β Is the new lighter "processed" version using the shown darker "processed" version as a basis?Β or did you use a different image and processed it in different ways to get these versions?Β
π: 0 β©: 0
Thanks for your critique. Maybe you mix up the both versions? The lighter one is the new processed, the darker one the older.
π: 0 β©: 0
Thank you again for the gorgeous dreamsΒ
π: 0 β©: 0
They're both good but I prefer the original since it's more realistic to me.
π: 1 β©: 0
Oh and after I added my comment I saw the previous version which I had faved sometime before, and I do see the warmer differences very nice good job I like them both actually so I favorited both of them have a great day
π: 1 β©: 1
Sure thing I have watched your work for some time , and you have a genuine knack and skill at this type of work
π: 0 β©: 0
Beautiful photo have seen this elsewhere stunning casual simple outdoors in nature pose quite erotic and sensual very nice job
π: 0 β©: 0