HOME | DD

stygorath In reply to felix-leg [2010-05-22 07:15:23 +0000 UTC]

will you believe me, when i tell you that it's very simple?^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

felix-leg In reply to stygorath [2010-05-22 07:25:46 +0000 UTC]

I will not . Thing which the mostly takes my mind is how every particle is created. I've spend some time in Flash, and I think there are two answers for that:

1) You have spend a lot of time making every possible particle, including its own rotation, add them all into one folder, and made the script which randomly takes particles from there

or

2) There is some 3D-generator feature in Flash I don't know...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

stygorath In reply to felix-leg [2010-05-22 08:58:45 +0000 UTC]

basically i got 2 movieclips and 3 codeblocks:

this one on the main timeline:

Mouse.hide();

var partickleness = 1;

onMouseMove = function(){
_root.attachMovie("part","part"+partickleness, partickleness);
}

this one inside the cursor movieclip

onEnterFrame = function(){

_x = _root._xmouse;
_y = _root._ymouse;

}


and finally this one on inside the "part" movieclip

_root.partickleness ++;
_x = _root._xmouse;
_y = _root._ymouse;

var speedx = (Math.random()*10)-5;
var speedy = (Math.random()*10)-5;


onEnterFrame = function(){
_x += speedx;
_y += speedy;

_alpha -= 2;
_rotation +=15
_xscale = (Math.random()*100);

if(_alpha <= 0){
this.removeMovieClip();
}
}

hopefully this was helpfull.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

felix-leg In reply to stygorath [2010-05-22 10:25:37 +0000 UTC]

Well I was supposed the script is easy (I could write quickly some by just looking on results).
The fact why I do , was the particles itself. If it was something as simple as just a dot, flat circle, etc. I could say just "phew". But it looks like there was something a la 3D object . Something definitely more interesting than a circle...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

stygorath In reply to felix-leg [2010-05-22 20:22:55 +0000 UTC]

it's because of the rotation, that the particles look so 3 dimensional. that was not supposed to happen, but i was experimenting and liked that result..

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

felix-leg In reply to stygorath [2010-05-24 13:31:43 +0000 UTC]

Yep, the result here makes people think it is more complicated than it is in real

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

stygorath In reply to felix-leg [2010-05-24 14:45:30 +0000 UTC]

you got it!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

stygorath In reply to Nightfirecat [2010-05-20 07:55:08 +0000 UTC]

prepare for more!
i'm currently experimenting.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

stygorath In reply to grandlinegirl [2010-05-20 07:55:22 +0000 UTC]

thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 0