HOME | DD

t-o-n-e In reply to ??? [2015-12-29 18:49:46 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for he heads up. You're probably right and I should have watermarked my art a while ago.. I guess I'm too generous! I saw someone in a different city walk past with one of my designs on her leg once..Thats a bit weird.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

t-o-n-e In reply to Twentyone21w [2013-12-25 17:26:10 +0000 UTC]

the 4 isnt wrong lol, many of the old timepieces showed the 4 numeral in this way x

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Twentyone21w In reply to t-o-n-e [2014-01-03 01:20:30 +0000 UTC]

yes but it wrong, on a clock you would use the modified version of the Roman numerals , I, II, III, IV. because you are not counting, the old version of the Roman Numerals was used to count numbers on a stick. IIIIVIIIIXIIIIVIIIIX one mark for every one, a v mark for every five, usually up side down, and a X mark for every ten. So If you went that way 1= I, 2= II, 3= III, 4= IIII, 5= IIIIV, 6= IIIIVI, 7=IIIIVII, 8= IIIIVIII, 9= IIIIVIIII, 10= IIIIVIIIIX, 11= IIIIVIIIIXI, and 12 would be IIIIVIIIIXII.  and to be technically correct Roman numerals only have the bars on top and bottom of the numerals when there multiplying.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

t-o-n-e In reply to Twentyone21w [2014-01-25 00:46:09 +0000 UTC]

I see! thanks for the info. 

regards the picture, I was making it look like a particular watch for a client so its accurate to that

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

t-o-n-e In reply to Tatooedallova [2013-04-24 15:52:35 +0000 UTC]

I charge for my designs but if you are willing to pay a little I could do you a nice design. Do you not have to be 18 to get tattood in your country?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Tatooedallova In reply to t-o-n-e [2013-04-24 22:41:27 +0000 UTC]

alright man also yep you can be 15 and above to get tatted up!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

t-o-n-e In reply to Tatooedallova [2013-05-09 19:37:26 +0000 UTC]

ha, jeebus! yeh just send me a msg with your ideas if you ever want to discuss a design

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

t-o-n-e In reply to IvyNightwind [2013-03-27 02:56:22 +0000 UTC]

yeh cool thank you, glad you like it

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

t-o-n-e In reply to Kruno1978 [2013-02-20 21:13:22 +0000 UTC]

hehe on this particular pocket watch (which the customer brought in for me to photo), the 'IV' was written as 'IIII' like above but cheers!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

t-o-n-e In reply to JBALTZLEY [2011-12-26 13:40:27 +0000 UTC]

cheers! Is it 'waisted' btw, or 'wasted'?!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JBALTZLEY In reply to t-o-n-e [2011-12-26 17:54:40 +0000 UTC]

It is wasted thank you for the clarity. never meant the referance to the body lol

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

t-o-n-e In reply to JBALTZLEY [2011-12-26 19:25:40 +0000 UTC]

hehe no problem There's loads of good photos on deviantArt for timepieces btw...just simplify them slightly if needs be. good luck with the tattoo!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

t-o-n-e In reply to jamonkey [2011-12-22 22:32:44 +0000 UTC]

thank you I will! cheers for the watch

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

t-o-n-e In reply to acetheone [2011-12-14 16:28:02 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

t-o-n-e In reply to VoodooBizkit [2011-12-11 22:22:53 +0000 UTC]

thank you much appreciated

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

t-o-n-e In reply to itchysack [2011-12-11 20:39:16 +0000 UTC]

thanking you itchy sack!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

t-o-n-e In reply to JonasOlsenWoodcraft [2011-12-11 19:16:15 +0000 UTC]

the roses were drawn from photo-observation, and the watch was the clients' grandad's (with a few details simplified). There's niggly mistakes in this (and unfinished obviously) but I'll probably draw some similar designs again soon.

cheers

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JonasOlsenWoodcraft In reply to t-o-n-e [2011-12-11 19:23:20 +0000 UTC]

well, its still an amazing piece

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

t-o-n-e In reply to JonasOlsenWoodcraft [2011-12-11 20:53:53 +0000 UTC]

hopefully with a bit more practice i should be able to do roses like this without reference

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JonasOlsenWoodcraft In reply to t-o-n-e [2011-12-11 22:06:58 +0000 UTC]

yeah, i`ve tried that ever since i started drawing, still im like 100 miles away from my target^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1