HOME | DD
Timon-Berkowitz — trashed stuffed animals
Published: 2017-06-08 01:31:35 +0000 UTC; Views: 6417; Favourites: 12; Downloads: 7
Redirect to original
Description
I had to downsize again. these ones were also soaked with pee too to avoid being removed from the dumpster. As for the Elmo, I found a newer one made more recently that altough its fur is less quality than this vintage 80's one in the picture, it looks far better in its body build and its also a puppet
interesting though, I noticed that the next morning that someone had taken the Elmo anyways despite being drippy wet, which is actually kinda cool. lol
Related content
Comments: 19
It's funny, I love your wetting and messing stuff, but seeing these photos makes me physically ill. I guess I'm a hoarder to the core.
Edit: It's more than that. I don't feel like this when I see other perfectly good items thrown away, not this bad. This is injurous to my soul, and I think the reason is I have a deep love and respect for plushies that I know they can't return. As irrational as it is, to me, stuffed animals are living things, and trashing thim is tantamount to killing them. I'm a plushophile in the truest sense of the word. Philia (φιλία) means love. In the same way, I am a zoophile. I love animals, both real and plush and would never inflict harm on them. Yes, it is sexual, in both instances, but that's only a small piece of the puzzle.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
It IS actually a puzzle. if you dont like the trashing you might not want to look though i dont do it as much as i used to anymore. It something I did when i had lots of stuffed toys coming in all the time and it helped reduce the number of toys so that my home didnt become totally unlivable due to the mass of accumulated plush.
I do like plush anyways though. and trashing some is only really possible because I allready have a bunch to keep me happy.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
If you want some interesting discussion of plushophilia, trashing, and other matters, read the comments of the Inkbunny journal I posted in response to this. inkbunny.net/j/335927
It is not a rant journal about you or anything. I didn't even mention you, and I respect your right to do as you choose. I just had some thoughts that I felt like sharing with my watchers.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Im a little concerned. you say its not a rant journal because you dont mention my name, but are you telling all your peers about 'this guy that does this and its so messed up'? That kind of leaves the way for people to then look around and find me out and come after me you know.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
If you want me to edit it and yell people not to bother you, I will. I really don't think anyone would do that, though. The only person I know on there who has any sort of the ideas I do is FoxWolfie, and he's talked to you nonjudgementally before, including on this very post. I really don't want people to go after you, and I was just sharing my thoughts to whoever wants to hear them. I don't think you're a bad guy, even if I disagree with some of the stuff you choose to do. I love discussion, and all I want is open dialog, even with people who disagree with me. Honestly, I'd love for you to join the discussion, and say why you disagree with me.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
well truthfully im sort of uncomfortable discussing it especially in a public sphere because I am expecting someone watching is just going to get so upset and fly in and start attacking right away. that has happened before. I really dont like people putting a great deal of attention on it. I survive by existing under the radar.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
That's up to you. I very rarely see that type of stuff on Inkbunny, and me and my freinds often publicly post opinions that are very different from the norm, and are liable to get you physically attcked if stated IRL in public. DA and FA have shittier communities in my experience. If you read the comments of the journal, you can see that I willingly apply a label to myself that most people wouldn't apply to their worst enemy. On a slighly less extreme note, me, and all 3 of the people I regularly talk to are admitted zoophiles. We aren't B.S self-hating zoophiles either. We all think that sexual activity with animals is completely okay, so long as the animal isn't hurt. Obviously the point is for the animal to feel good too. This opinion has led to people attacking me, but I don't let it bother me. I just try to reason with them, and if it doesn't work, they usually give up yelling at me before I give up trying to reason with them. I should note that it was always on this site that I was attacked for holding certain opinions, never on Inkbunny.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yeah that kind of thing is something i always was curious but cautious about. One cannot easily determine if an animal is reciprocative. Ive thought but i dont go as far as others have gone with that. I have had dogs lick my feet before which was very nice and enjoyable ^^ and i like watching dogs and horses going doo-doo. Though again the well being of the animal is really important and i think that it would not be good to force something on them. I dont hate zoophiles outright, ive seen that documentary "Zoo" before and its very insightful. There are some though that creep me out in some of them things they do as they are really predatory. Though there are others who i do feel a level of sympathy for. They have this love of these creatures that has a lot to do with how badly human relations can be that make the affection of an animal feel a lot more genuine and accepting. For me though, Ive found plushies and fursuits are a good thing for me as they are not simply just animal-like, but they are engendered with human characteristics in their design and expressions. They are always cuddly and your best friend, clean, easy to manage and squishy soft. That brings a special appeal to me ^^
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Note: Isay what I mean in no uncertain terms in this post, as such it includes extremely frand discusson of sexual actes with animals. I've barely slept in like 37 hours, and as such any social filter I may have had is long gone. That's probably for the best though, so there is no confusion as to what I'm talking about.
I actually thinkit's quite trivial to tell if an animal is reciprocative. They aren'tgoing to let something they don't want happen to them wiithout a protest. Dogs will tell you if they aren't happy. Anyone who's been around dogs will know that they will at least growl if they feel threatened. There are definitely plenty of much more inherently sexual things that one can do with an animal without any chance of harming them. For instance, giving an animal a handjob will never be anything but good for the animal. Also, dogs like to lick. There's really no difference between letting a dog lick your feet, and letting them lick your dick or asshole. As long as nothing is forced, it's completely harmless. Allowing an animal to fuck you, as long as properly lubrication is used, is only dangerous for the human being fucked (even then only if they're stupid and don't know their own limits), and it certainly would only be pleasurable for the animal. The only act that really has any potential for harm is actually fucking an animal. I admit that I know nothing about female animals (I'm 100% gay), but some things obviously aren't problems. A mare couldn't even tell that you were back there probably, it'd be boring for her if anything. Many dog dicks are bigger than human dicks, and they have a huge kniot, so I think an apropriately sized female dog could be fucked with it being pleasureable for her. I've also heard people swear wup and down that some male (and female for that matter) animals like (recieveing) anal sex. IF the animal honestly enjoys it and makes no attempt to resist, I'm sure it's fine.
I'll admit that I haven't seen that documentary. What are some of the things that zoos do that you find predaory?
I should note that I basically have no sexual expeirinece with either animals or humans. Honestly, as far as I go in my fantasies is getting (male) animals off, and letting them lick me if they so choose. I don't think either one of these actions really has any potential for harm. Of course, the well-being of the animal is always the main concern. I'd never have an animal unless I could properly care for them, and I would never treat them as objects for my sexual pleasure. Like I said, most of what I want to do is give them pleasure. I honestly think regularly getting off is good for the health of any animal, human or otherwise. Everyone knows that animals that aren't castrated can get agressive. It seems logical that this is largly because they're pent-up. Regularly helping one's pets get off is a great way to keep them acting freindly without having to chop their balls off. Legally speaking, I do have to say that I don't encourage doing anything illegal.
I do have more I could say, like how I think the issue of informed consent is a total non-starter in this case, but I'll leave it there because I'm tired. I'll be glad to answer any of your questions, and adress anything we may disagree about.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Well.... its a touchy subject to talk about...
I still am not sure of everything that you speak about especially involving dogs. Im aware that dogs will lick freely a body part if they want to. thats expected. But you know.... penetration.... i still think that is something that is really questionable about abuse or not. Ive seen a couple of guys long ago say 'oh yeah i can tell shes loving it' I am highly suspect of that statement especially that its coming from the guy who is wanting to do that. The idea of an animal giving consent to be the receiver is really really shaky. How can you possibly tell that? I mean i know some dogs will on their own try and do stuff like sniff at your privates or drink a stream of pee. But there is no clear way I can see that a dog would come up to you and say *i want to be penetrated*. I personally would not want to partake in such a thing and I think that it would be very easy for that to slip into abuse. Afterall as the owner humans are the ones in total control. And that brings with it its own problems:
For some people, dangerous people, the only kind of sexual experience they like are ones where they feel in total control. Guys who fantasize about the frail, dainty, helpless female that wants them. People who check on their partner 24-7 and are highly suspect of them socializing with anyone. Bondage porn that always portrays the female tied up servicing the guy. Heck even erotic works ive seen that always show a totally nude female bound by a totally clothed man all radiates this very strong aura of total submission and dominance. It would be extremely easy for someone who has that feeling of always having to be in total control in a sexual situation to turn interaction with a pet into definite abuse. There are some zoophiles that need to be locked up. While i will say that its incredibly hypocritical how our culture tends to put a lot more contempt on zoo compared to how little we care about violent animal abuse in the meat trade and lab studies, zoo is something that can also easily slip into abuse and harm. Consent in the animal world is totally a real issue, its not clear and defined. And hearing a guy say that he did it with a dog and say that he knows the animal liked it because "i could see it in her eyes she loved it" totally is not going to reassure me.
And i know you may not like all that i say but i do believe that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Okay... i dont want to take this much any further on DA and Im mostly done with this conversation. Im sure female dogs like to be vaginally penetrated, but again, a human is not equipped to with 100% confidence say "Oh yeah! I know she wants it from me!" I totally will not believe that.
In addition, The document you sent me you say the guy 'obviously cares about the animals" but any idea of a thoughtful insight is thrown right out the window the moment he says he advocates raping male dogs who dont want it (im sure he didnt word it that way but that is what it is!) AND that is doubled down when he is apparently as you admit, treating them as sex objects! If this is supposed to serve as an insight into the mind of a zoophile for all of us, then it would quite easily lead to zoos being rounded up and thrown in prison. And if they all think like this, then that is a just result. Ive tried to have a lot more respect for dogs than that. We are humans and we are the ones in power, we have a responsibility to not abuse our pets.
Now im done talking about this.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Okay man, you just ignored 99% of both what I said, and what the document says in favor of only focousing on what could possibly be considered bad. Both of the things you brought up, I already mentioned. The sex toy thing is really just an off-hand comment. It's a joke about how horny dogs are. If someone were to make a joke about their human boyfriend being a good ficktoy because of how horny they are, would you really think that they treat that person as an object?
As for the anal sex thing, I already admitted it wasn't the best thing. I'm not trying to say that this guy is some sort of shining example, merely that most of what he says isn't bad and shows he loves the animals. What you conviently forgot to mention is that he specifically said, in regards to anal sex with male dogs. "DON'T force him to comply with your perverted desires if he doesn't want to." It's not like he's holding down the dog and violently raping him. I don't really know what the situation is. All he says is that the dog "tolerates" it. I definitely think sex should be more than just tolerated, but I'm not going to call him a rapist based on something I know nothing about.
How about all the other things he said, that show he cares about the pleasure of the animals:
" Don't force it; you don't ever want to hurt her, betraying her trust in you."
"Do not touch the sensitive flesh at this stage, or he'll go soft on you, he won't enjoy it."
"Spend some time during your love-making with your doggy partner to praise them, and re-assure them. Fondle them, cuddle them, and generally treat them like an equal."
Honestly, just read his last two paragraphs.
"Spend some time during your love-making with your doggy partner to praise them, and re-assure them. Fondle them, cuddle them, and generally treat them like an equal. They are giving the gift of their love to you too, so don't take them for granted. Afterward, lie with them, hug them, talk softly to them.
If you own a dog, and don't have sex with them, think on this; Dogs love sex. They enjoy the sensations of orgasm, and unless you help them to achieve it, cannot achieve it themselves. Think on how frustrated you would be if you couldn't even masturbate yourself when you were horny. As a dog owner, you have taken the animal from his natural habitat where he would mate at every opportunity if he could, and put him in an environment where sex just isn't available. If you love your dog, you should extend the gift of sexual release toward him or her. It will deepen their love for you, and your love for them. I'm not asking you to engage in wild sexual odysseys with your dog (I can highly recommend it as fun, though!!), but at least you could jerk off your male dog, or rub the clitoris of your bitch to relieve them. It isn't unhealthy, it isn't sick, it isn't even perverted (I mean, animal breeders do it for a living). It is love."
He doesn't tell people to have sex with dogs because it feels good for the human, but rather because it feels good for the dog. If you ignore the stuff about anal sex with male dogs, everything here shows of the love and respect that zoophiles have for animals. The problems are the exception, not the rule. I know you said you were done, so be done, I just couldn't leave it off where you left it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
If I came upon that dumpster, I would have immediately rescued what I think is a big white bunny on the left, and I would have grabbed that cute polar bear with the scarf. The fact that you's already stained their fur with wetness would only have made them more desirable to take out of the dumpster. I probably would have left Elmo though, since I already have a few of him, and the desired staining doesn't show up as well on his red fur.
I just tossed more good plushies in one day than are the thrift stores in my area have sold in the past few years. Our stores simply don't sell plushies of that size any more. Seeing something even as large as a Build-a-Bear is pretty rare around here, which makes eBay the only real way for me to find plushies like those. Unfortunately, I end up paying not only for the plush, but also for the shipping, which means I pass most of them up. Shipping alone is affordable, cost of plushies alone is affordable, but shipping and plushie cost combined usually is not.
I definitely enjoy the photos, even though I wish their fate was with me, instead of an overly hungry dumpster! If you ever find another otter like your big one though, let me know! I'd certainly buy one of him - even more so, if you took him for a nice long walk and let him do some sniffing around as your Hickory otter did. After all, plushies are always the most fun when they smell like their playful real life counterparts.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
THat otter was a huge freaking lucky score. Id not trade it even for the big Thumper I want now. So if I found another I highly doubt Id ever trash it. Maybe if I found 10 of them i might throw out one or two. Sell or give away the others. Im not as concerned about smaller otter plush.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Same here. Smaller otters aren't too hard to find. An eBay search turns up lots of them. It's rare to ever see an other plush that is over two feet long though. I'd definitely go for one though. One like your Hickory is especially desirable, since he has the exploratory curiosity of a real otter, and has gotten his nose into some fun and interesting things. Other rare to find plushies in a huge size are skunks, beavers, raccoons, ferrets, porcupines and such. Whenever those show up, they are usually Build-a-Bear size or even smaller. I know Douglas made their jumbo Meeko, but those are very rare now and quite expensive. I can only imagine a beaver in that size!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I once had another plush otter about close to the same size. Its with a friend right now. But its shape and fur wasnt as nice as Hickory the otter.
I feel like I was blessed to find that otter. I know he is not as ornate as the Hansa top end plush otter. But hes almost twice its size!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I actually don't care for many of the Hansa plushies I've seen. They are way over-priced, and usually not as cute or nice looking as other cheaper brands. I love the dense soft fur like your otter appears to have. It seems to be the good fur they used in the '90s. I have one somewhat large otter, but he has that horrible microfiber chenille fur that so many newer plushies have. It's not very durable at all, and is rather thin fur instead of being nice and dense. He's still my largest otter that is big enough to cuddle and sleep with. His fur is not holding up well. Companies or making plushies to be bought, placed on a self for few months, then gotten rid of for something new and different. They simply don't make many plushies that are durable enough to long-term cuddling any more. Those days ended a dozen years ago.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0