HOME | DD
Published: 2011-08-18 15:59:09 +0000 UTC; Views: 17940; Favourites: 66; Downloads: 326
Redirect to original
Description
A locally-produced brushstroke camouflage pattern, influenced by the original British Denison design, was developed for Rhodesian security forces in 1965. The pattern would incorporate brown & forest green brush strokes on a yellowish-tan background, creating a scheme more suitable to the African bush than the older WW2 and 1950s era designs. The 1st pattern Rhodesian brush design was produced from 1965 until 1969, and replaced by a 2nd pattern produced from 1970 until the end of the war. The latter featured brown & dark green brush strokes on a khaki background, and was produced on a much wider variety of uniform items. This was standard combat issue to both the Rhodesian Army and BSAP.An experimental version of the Rhodesian brushstroke pattern was also produced between 1965 and 1969, having brown & yellow brush strokes on a sandy background. It is believed the pattern was tested for issue during the African dry or winter season, although it appears the uniforms were only tested by special forces and never fully implemented.
======================================
Information from Camopedia's Rhodesia page .
I personally know little of african patterns, so I have nothing to say on this one. Instead, the wiki can speak for me. Which it did, if you've scrolled this far.
Related content
Comments: 16
Cid-Vicious [2023-07-28 17:04:48 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
iNorton [2013-01-25 16:17:29 +0000 UTC]
any possibility to obtain .png file of the camouflage?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Tounushi In reply to iNorton [2013-02-03 13:52:44 +0000 UTC]
There's a link further down in the comments.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
LoyaltyToTheEnd [2012-05-25 17:59:20 +0000 UTC]
I have heard from fmr Selous Scouts that this pattern was highly effective.
(They were masters of concealment so that probley helped the pattern a lot )
Anyways, have you ever experimented or tested with this pattern?
If so, what were the results?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Wolohan2011 [2011-09-22 16:36:35 +0000 UTC]
Excellent rendition of the Rhodie pattern.
I'd kill to have an original, full set of it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Zypherartworks [2011-08-20 23:00:26 +0000 UTC]
I like this an effective yet simple design. Have you seen the US Army camo trials? One on the patterns they tested was called "Brush" looks like this but with some pixelating. It actually was better than the god awful abortion of a patter we have now.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Tounushi In reply to Zypherartworks [2011-08-21 00:25:36 +0000 UTC]
There was no pixellation used in any of the original test patterns.
I still cannot understand how they selected the worst pattern of the bunch as the winner, and then went with a CADPAT derivative anyway...
And now they have to do it all over again. Wonder if it was merely rushed development or some industrial pressure to select and implement a new pattern...
The US testing patterns are really hard to find.
I'd almost pay money to have a full tile of All Over Brush...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Zypherartworks In reply to Tounushi [2011-08-21 00:36:35 +0000 UTC]
With the camo trials "part duex" in Afghan-land there are pictures of soldiers testings all kinds of patterns including the Brush like this one
[link]
but yea we got screwed big time with ucp
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Tounushi In reply to Zypherartworks [2011-08-21 07:51:43 +0000 UTC]
Political and bureaucratic expediency are never a good thing when it comes to military matters.
Remember the first NATO round? Brits wanted their 7x43mm, but the americans insisted on a "shortened" 7.62mm (which was barely shorter than the 1891 russian cartridge).
Just 20 or so years later they had to design a new one, the 5.56mm. Now the 6.8mmSPC is ballistically identical to the old british 7mm. Took the fools 60 years to correct the mistake of politicians and political generals.
If you want something to stick, do it right the first time around and save everyone a ton of trouble.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Zypherartworks In reply to Tounushi [2011-08-21 07:58:51 +0000 UTC]
I agree with you on the political crap that slows down military matters and to make matters worse there's always that one that acts totally surprised by the outcome.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
minerug [2011-08-19 01:17:45 +0000 UTC]
Thanks mate! I never knew people other then me were looking for it.
Great work!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Tounushi In reply to minerug [2011-08-19 09:23:54 +0000 UTC]
Easier to find and piece together than Denison, but still much like it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
minerug In reply to Tounushi [2011-08-19 11:19:22 +0000 UTC]
From what I've read, I'm under the impression that the Denison pattern development sort of branched off in the 60's to form the Rhodesian pattern, while at the same time they started playing around with DPM. Not sure if my summation is absolutely correct, but is makes sense to me... Perhaps my badly implemented flow chart below will clarify my thoughts
_________________________________________DPM 1960 > DPM '68 > DPM '85 > S95 DPM
________________________________________/
Denison 1st pattern> Denison 2nd pattern > Rhodesian > unofficial variants
___________________________________________\
____________________________________________Golden Rhodesian
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Tounushi In reply to rrossouw [2011-08-18 20:38:32 +0000 UTC]
There might be a more to the pattern on the horizontal. This is all I've found enough for reconstruction.
[link]
I do not know the real dimensions, but the tile is 50x70cm.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
crowhitewolf [2011-08-18 16:06:52 +0000 UTC]
Holy shit you don't even know how long I had been looking for that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0

























