HOME | DD

V-e-x-e-n β€” Break Time :GIF:

Published: 2012-05-30 04:17:24 +0000 UTC; Views: 2363; Favourites: 21; Downloads: 18
Redirect to original
Description The title "Break Time" comes from the move you get in BBS. Anyway, this is Vexen shooting up with a dirty needle,

This is #KingdomAsylum !Vexen.

The Doctor is trippin' balls, I tell you.

Notice the tattoo
Related content
Comments: 54

V-e-x-e-n In reply to ??? [2014-07-22 04:06:37 +0000 UTC]

Why thank you ;D

I've been wanting to go and redo this one for some time now, but haven't had the time or motivation ;__;

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

nativism [2014-05-04 06:20:27 +0000 UTC]

That's bloody fantastic...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

V-e-x-e-n In reply to nativism [2014-05-04 16:29:17 +0000 UTC]

Thank you! I tried, though there are quite a few things off about it.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

LarxeneSavageNymph [2013-12-09 02:59:20 +0000 UTC]

aaw that hurts, it bleeds.

Cool and fantastic.

Wait, I remember now *observing*. Β Are you VexenReplica Fourtyfourth? Β *flashes back*

Is kind a recall. ,

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

V-e-x-e-n In reply to LarxeneSavageNymph [2013-12-09 16:16:29 +0000 UTC]

And infected!

I am no replica, though...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

LarxeneSavageNymph In reply to V-e-x-e-n [2013-12-10 00:13:19 +0000 UTC]

Are you Vexen Frigidu in facebook?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

V-e-x-e-n In reply to LarxeneSavageNymph [2013-12-10 01:00:17 +0000 UTC]

Nope! That's my friend *Dr-FrankenSol

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

LarxeneSavageNymph In reply to V-e-x-e-n [2013-12-10 04:38:29 +0000 UTC]

I thought she is you! You are another Vexen fan girl.
Are you sure you have no contact with Vexenreplica FourtyFourth (Devil Faustman)?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

V-e-x-e-n In reply to LarxeneSavageNymph [2013-12-13 21:58:24 +0000 UTC]

No clue who it is! O: I used to run a Vexen page on facebook but it's full of weeaboos so I stopped updating it @_@

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

LarxeneSavageNymph In reply to V-e-x-e-n [2013-12-14 01:59:02 +0000 UTC]

Hello I'm not a weeaboo. And you must be "Vexen IV" from Facebook. So yes I hate facebook there are a bunch of irritating weeaboos are there. Well if you are not Vexenreplica FourtyFourth so he must be Jothias Edbert the loser cv fantard.
Hmm. I stop updating posts too cause there are a bunch of crazy people in there and facebook gave me negative energy.
FB was born in the cursed year since 2007. It's a cursed year that's why facebook becomes the over rated

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

V-e-x-e-n In reply to LarxeneSavageNymph [2013-12-14 14:37:35 +0000 UTC]

I never said you were a weeaboo xD I said the people on that page were weeaboos lol.

This is my page. I'm just me, though :S www.facebook.com/iinsanityPoti…

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

LarxeneSavageNymph In reply to V-e-x-e-n [2013-12-15 03:07:00 +0000 UTC]

Yeah its a bunch of them.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

V-e-x-e-n In reply to LarxeneSavageNymph [2013-12-15 16:41:02 +0000 UTC]

I see you added me ^o^

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

LarxeneSavageNymph In reply to V-e-x-e-n [2013-12-15 23:34:57 +0000 UTC]

Yes I do ^-^

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ArtistGoneFishing In reply to V-e-x-e-n [2013-12-10 02:02:46 +0000 UTC]

Hidden by Commenter

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

V-e-x-e-n In reply to ArtistGoneFishing [2013-12-10 02:31:01 +0000 UTC]

Weird, I didn't know that people got notifications from tags now... O_o

I had to look up the name on facebook since it sounded so familiar, and turns out it was you! XD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ArtistGoneFishing In reply to V-e-x-e-n [2013-12-10 14:58:37 +0000 UTC]

Hidden by Commenter

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

V-e-x-e-n In reply to ArtistGoneFishing [2013-12-10 21:25:13 +0000 UTC]

Mind if I add you? XD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ArtistGoneFishing In reply to V-e-x-e-n [2013-12-10 22:24:51 +0000 UTC]

Hidden by Commenter

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

V-e-x-e-n In reply to ArtistGoneFishing [2013-12-10 23:34:42 +0000 UTC]

Did it!! ^O^

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Maixsu [2012-06-03 08:12:21 +0000 UTC]

Omg hypnotic O_O

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

V-e-x-e-n In reply to Maixsu [2012-06-03 13:30:07 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!! <3

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Maixsu In reply to V-e-x-e-n [2012-06-04 05:59:26 +0000 UTC]

YouΒ΄re welcome

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

RainbowPonyFairy [2012-05-31 03:29:15 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

V-e-x-e-n In reply to RainbowPonyFairy [2012-05-31 14:18:32 +0000 UTC]

He's the best...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

RainbowPonyFairy In reply to V-e-x-e-n [2012-05-31 15:22:00 +0000 UTC]

:Hearts:

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

KillerKishi [2012-05-31 02:16:25 +0000 UTC]

Aaaah! MAybe if I favorite it the creepy face will get out from behind my eyes. D:>

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

V-e-x-e-n In reply to KillerKishi [2012-05-31 03:20:59 +0000 UTC]

@W @ THE CREEPY FACE NEVA GOES AWAY, NIGGUH

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

KillerKishi In reply to V-e-x-e-n [2012-05-31 03:25:23 +0000 UTC]

Waaaah! Nightmares!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Kitty-Mikado [2012-05-30 18:09:57 +0000 UTC]

Holy Hell... the area around his arm is just... wow... Another amazing colouring job!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

V-e-x-e-n In reply to Kitty-Mikado [2012-05-30 20:02:59 +0000 UTC]

Thanks hehe... I have to say, I didn't /really/ know what I was doing with the colors-- I used a reference from Requiem for a Dream (if you've ever seen that). It was the closest I could get to a needle-based infection. I love making things look rotten.... or at least trying to!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Kitty-Mikado In reply to V-e-x-e-n [2012-05-30 21:01:21 +0000 UTC]

Unfortunately, no, I've never seen Requiem for a Dream...though now I want to.

The infection looks so amazing~ You do a great job with rotten/decayed/macabre.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

basarafangirl [2012-05-30 14:18:00 +0000 UTC]

EPIC !!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

V-e-x-e-n In reply to basarafangirl [2012-05-30 15:45:58 +0000 UTC]

Thanks! ;D

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

basarafangirl In reply to V-e-x-e-n [2012-05-30 16:05:34 +0000 UTC]

np

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Redemption909 [2012-05-30 13:31:52 +0000 UTC]

This is rather messed up but extremely awesome. XD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

V-e-x-e-n In reply to Redemption909 [2012-05-30 15:51:05 +0000 UTC]

Thank you, haha >B)

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

RoxasNamineForever [2012-05-30 11:29:57 +0000 UTC]

Niiiice ^^
Really like the detail on his arm where the syringe goes in, and the background's pretty cool too!

....I am so glad though that Rox and Vy aren't his patients XD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

V-e-x-e-n In reply to RoxasNamineForever [2012-05-30 15:53:30 +0000 UTC]

I think you mean.... TOO BAD Rox and Vy aren't his patients. ;D

YOU MUST BE SO SADDENED! >B)

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

RoxasNamineForever In reply to V-e-x-e-n [2012-05-30 20:54:54 +0000 UTC]

Oh yeah.. fingers slipped ¬¬

OH WOE IS ME

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Dyxo [2012-05-30 04:39:24 +0000 UTC]

>Vexen
>Dragoon lance tattoo

I see what you did there

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

V-e-x-e-n In reply to Dyxo [2012-05-30 04:51:17 +0000 UTC]

>B))))))))

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Keotalf [2012-05-30 04:31:07 +0000 UTC]

Ah, you have so much yet to learn...~
But I guess it's a start, right? Nice picture. C:

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

V-e-x-e-n In reply to Keotalf [2012-05-30 04:50:32 +0000 UTC]

Also, it's super nice to know that you know all about shooting up!! ^_^ You're super cool, man!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Keotalf In reply to V-e-x-e-n [2012-05-30 05:21:25 +0000 UTC]

I know I'll only piss you off more for starting it this way, but really now, do calm down.
First off, that genuinely was a positive comment. I wouldn't've put a tilde and smiley if I didn't enjoy it, now really. You genuinely do have a lot of things to learn, but that isn't a bad thing! New vistas and things to learn and enjoy are always wonderful. It's delightful to see someone foray into something new.
Secondly, you're putting an awful lots of words in my mouth. I don't think it's too terribly far off base - I certainly can't pick out any major flaws, let alone with the positioning of things. You might want to give him a tourniquet, but it's an acceptable detail to give or take. I actually quite like the colors, both on his arm and elsewhere. I never critiqued your roleplay, or your references, or colors, or anything particular at all, actually.
Third, I'm not pretending to be any expert on shooting up, but I'd like to think I know a bit more than average for someone that doesn't use that as a Route of Administration. Nor did I suggest it makes me cool at all.
Lastly, I honestly enjoyed the picture itself. You, or any of my followers, might know that. My Tumblr used to be 90% trippy image reblogs by volume. It's got a good all around feel to it - the colors work well, there aren't any egregious mistakes, and I like the fact that it's a GIF (and it looks surprisingly good for being one, considering what that usually does to image quality). The face actually reminds me of the cover of The Bends by Radiohead, and that's certainly intended as a compliment.

The only criticism I have to speak of is that you could maybe do a bit more with the backgrounds - they're acceptable as they are, but don't live up to their full potential. But hey, no big deal, not like it ruins the piece. Like I said, it's your first foray in a few ways, and it's honestly a good start.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

V-e-x-e-n In reply to Keotalf [2012-05-30 05:32:18 +0000 UTC]

First and foremost: I wouldn't call this a foray. In context, Vexen is a pretty crazy son of a bitch, so it's not really anything new or out of the ordinary. Secondly, just because I don't do drugs doesn't mean that I don't know anything about them, which seems to be what you are implying, hence the word "foray." If not, then you should probably choose a different word, hah.

It's just a doodle, like I said, so I wasn't too into making a background (I generally dislike them anyway).

I didn't say that YOU said shooting up makes you cool. I was saying it. Myself.

If you weren't criticizing anything, then why say that I have an awful lot to learn? What was even the point of the comment? What exactly do I have to learn? You know, since you haven't answered that question yet. Like... I am all for constructive criticism, but if that's what you're trying to do, then do it. Don't just leave these strangely subjective comments that confuse the fuck out of me and make you look like a huge, condescending asshole.

Also keep in mind that this is digital-- and I am much better with just a plain old pencil and paper. This image isn't really a very good assessment of my capabilities. None of my digital work is.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Keotalf In reply to V-e-x-e-n [2012-05-30 05:56:22 +0000 UTC]

In the context of the image, no, it certainly isn't a foray. For you, however? I'd imagine it is. -As far as I'm aware-, you do not: typically animate gifs very often, create much in the way of trippy imagery, or depict much drug use in your art. There are three things which you've not got mounds of experience in, so foray does seem appropriate. That being said, THERE IS NOT ANYTHING WRONG WITH THAT. It being an experimental or unconventional piece for you does nothing to degrade its quality.

I wasn't upset or bothered by the background, I simply cited it as one clear area where there could be improvement. I was merely separating out my only genuine critique from the rest of my comments.

That was the implication there and you know it. Unless you're trying to suggest that was totally genuine and free of sarcasm?

The problem is that you're seeing that comment as being exclusively something negative, which isn't the case at all. It was joyous - ecstatic even. Its point is as simple as expressing that sentiment. And what you have to learn could be whatever you want to take from this. Detail work, psychedelic imagery, you name it. I saw a lot of different things you could have learned from making this or other similar pieces and experienced a sort of vicarious excitement. I was only expressing positive feelings here Rachel - your comments have all been the incendiary ones.

I'd leave you more concrit if I was any sort of a real artist. Even when scouting for imperfections, I don't have the vocabulary to relay most of them, so what would the point be? All I'm here to do is give simple approval, that's all.

I've never said anything disparaging about your digital work. I think it's just lovely. If you prefer your traditional work, that's fine as well. I honestly see no reason why it's relevant though.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

V-e-x-e-n In reply to Keotalf [2012-05-30 15:44:49 +0000 UTC]

Never said anything toward your comment about the background-- I was just saying that I can't stand backgrounds.

Uploading a GIF on dA? Out of the ordinary. However (not that anyone would know) making gifs are regular assignments for a bunch of my classes, so it's no big. Also the gif was just intended to be more.... uh, psychedelic. Since I was just gonna leave the background plain white, pfff. XD

I'm not seeing the comment as negative, I just don't see the pont in leaving a confusing comment if you can't really explain what exactly I have so much to "learn" about. You say you're here to give simple approval, but when you combine "you have so much to learn" with "but... nice picture," it doesn't really come off that way. Sorry if you can't see that, but that is how I see it, and how others saw it. Just take into consideration that what you said was either condescending/confusing/unnecessary (at least one of those).

I never said that you said anything against my digital stuff, I was just trying to make myself feel better about your "you have so much to learn" comment, as my traditional work is much nicer, fuller, and more complete-- except you can't make a piece of paper into a gif.

Jesus, you really get defensive when I say things like "well my traditional art is better" or "lol how cool that you know so much about shooting up." You should chill out, man.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Keotalf In reply to V-e-x-e-n [2012-05-30 16:28:06 +0000 UTC]

You flipped your shit on here and started complaining about it on Facebook. If both of those aren't "seeing the comment as negative" then I have no idea what is. I totally see how it can come off a different way - added openness to interpretation is one of the traits inherent in written communication. I tried to narrow that to something more positive by including the tilde. And worst case scenario, it's a vague comment. So what? No need to get twisted up over it.

I fail to see how my response to your "traditional art" comment was "[really] defensive". If it's anything, the entire chain is irrelevant. And yeah, I did get defensive about the shooting up comment because it was a blatant attack.

Maybe if you spent more time actually reading the comments and less time projecting your insecurities onto someone else, we could have avoided this. -That- is a condescending comment.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

V-e-x-e-n In reply to Keotalf [2012-05-30 16:54:13 +0000 UTC]

Also the shooting up thing was definitely a pretty blatant attack, but you're the one who parades around basically BOASTING to me on Skype how easy it is for you to obtain drugs. The people I know who are in possession of drugs USE them.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0


| Next =>