HOME | DD
Published: 2012-02-24 07:41:36 +0000 UTC; Views: 40264; Favourites: 929; Downloads: 1435
Redirect to original
Description
small feathersRelated content
Comments: 61
hotfights [2017-10-08 13:50:07 +0000 UTC]
Fantastic hood. Naturally "flappy" ( before stimulation!)
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
hotfights In reply to modele-izumi [2017-10-08 13:49:25 +0000 UTC]
I was thinking like my favorite flower, the iris!
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
buzzsawpc [2013-06-13 03:15:28 +0000 UTC]
Would eat for days!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
extraspecialimages [2013-05-28 04:30:27 +0000 UTC]
Look, you either find this artistic, or you don't. It is both deeply artistic and blatantly sexual. It is all in what the eye sees. Not one view is right or wrong. Each viewer has their own eyes by which to view this subject. Do not provoke. Keep your views open and positive, even if you dislike what you see. There is no need to belittle, for it makes your viewpoint less agreeable. I applaud all of your varied viewpoints and welcome all civil discussion.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
mitchbadedesign In reply to extraspecialimages [2013-05-29 14:18:33 +0000 UTC]
perfectly put!
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
SmurfyCarl [2013-05-07 00:38:29 +0000 UTC]
I don't see any feathers I must be missing it ?
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
VirtualSurround [2013-01-24 10:01:41 +0000 UTC]
The human body is art. No matter how it is portrayed. Nothing else comes close in beauty, ugliness and complexity.
I find this a beautiful picture.
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
photobobbo [2012-03-04 10:50:32 +0000 UTC]
archangel... if you don't like it quit wasting your time here and fuckin move on!
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
incolunt [2012-02-28 20:34:10 +0000 UTC]
some people may say porn, i think a wonderful pic of a wonderful part
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
nigelnaturist In reply to chrismday [2012-02-27 17:58:58 +0000 UTC]
Well its not porn, so what would you call it
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
chrismday In reply to nigelnaturist [2012-02-27 18:18:31 +0000 UTC]
Half assed porn that doesn't belong here.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
nigelnaturist In reply to chrismday [2012-03-05 20:58:14 +0000 UTC]
I think you better go check the definition of porn.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
ArtemDesigns In reply to nigelnaturist [2013-01-28 21:15:17 +0000 UTC]
he is one of two, he does not like female body or he is jealous he cant get a nice one like this.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
ErsatzSybelle [2012-02-25 04:43:30 +0000 UTC]
Great! just tell me when you think abuot post some art, but great shot...
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
wasilli In reply to ErsatzSybelle [2012-02-25 07:06:10 +0000 UTC]
Maybe not art, But I think that looks nice...
thanks for comment
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
Melalina [2012-02-24 23:41:52 +0000 UTC]
Why do people who don't like this kind of stuff, click on it to get a closer look?
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
Archangel-Zer0 In reply to Melalina [2012-02-25 06:30:13 +0000 UTC]
Wow, you must be a genius. That sure shows us all what's what. Congratulations, you've won an argument on the internet! You're so awesome!
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
Melalina In reply to Archangel-Zer0 [2012-02-25 07:46:39 +0000 UTC]
I still think it's a good question regardless of the smart-assed response. Nobody's sarcastic, know-it-all opinion is going to change that.
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
lukedrawings [2012-02-24 17:04:48 +0000 UTC]
You shouldnt be jealous that your vague doesnt look as good as this one. Get over it
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
Archangel-Zer0 In reply to lukedrawings [2012-02-25 06:29:14 +0000 UTC]
vag* and why do people who support this crap always assume it's "jealousy?"
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
BOMBDOORS [2012-02-24 14:04:23 +0000 UTC]
Beautiful delicate flower open and ripe. Wonderfully detailed. I love this art.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
| Next =>
























