HOME | DD

webblaster48 In reply to iAkumu [2008-10-05 10:26:28 +0000 UTC]

thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

iAkumu In reply to webblaster48 [2008-10-05 10:28:42 +0000 UTC]

^^ np

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

webblaster48 In reply to ragingpixels [2008-08-31 12:19:32 +0000 UTC]

it is displacement and as a map I used noise (blurred)

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

webblaster48 In reply to sicklizard [2008-08-14 12:49:38 +0000 UTC]

Yup I know It can go faster but I wanted this in high quality... I use 3ds max + vray.

This was created mostly using vray material displacement tool(ammount:4, edge length 1px) and irradiance on 'high' preset. + HDRI.

I think that edge length thingy slowed that down... Yup ur'e righ maybe when I set that values to low It could be faster but worse quality. correct me if I'm wrong...
(my sys: old athlon ~2ghz & 1Gig of RAM)

If u want I can send u source to play with it

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sicklizard In reply to webblaster48 [2008-08-14 14:19:03 +0000 UTC]

OK. 2 gigs are a bit slow. But of course you are right. setting the values down, makes the result worse.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

sicklizard In reply to sicklizard [2008-08-14 11:54:35 +0000 UTC]

Sorry. Forgot to say that it looks totally cool and organic.
Respect.
It'a a FAV

By the way: In Cinema4D you can use a displacement-deformer instead of a displacement funktion. If you convert it into a editable mesh you can bake down the polygon count after that.
That helps. It also helps to play with the GI(radiosity) sample values.
Rendering it with final render or vRay also saves time with the right settings.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0